Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 23:26:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363316: libxft-dev should no longer depend on x-dev, but
on x11proto-core-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libxft-dev
Version: 2.1.8.2-6
Severity: minor
libxft-dev should no longer depend on x-dev, but on x11proto-core-dev,
as it is the last package to depend upon the x-dev transitional package
instead of x11proto-core-dev.
Regards
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages libxft-dev depends on:
ii libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.3.6-7 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii libfontconfig1-dev 2.3.2-5.1 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype6-dev 2.1.10-3 FreeType 2 font engine, developmen
ii libx11-dev 2:1.0.0-6 X11 client-side library (developme
ii libxft2 2.1.8.2-6 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii libxrender-dev 1:0.9.0.2-3 X Rendering Extension client libra
pi x-dev 7.0.4-3 dummy package for transition purpo
ii x11-common 1:7.0.14 X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc
ii zlib1g-dev [libz-dev] 1:1.2.3-11 compression library - development
libxft-dev recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 02:12:09PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> Package: libxft-dev
> Version: 2.1.8.2-6
> Severity: minor
>
> libxft-dev should no longer depend on x-dev, but on x11proto-core-dev,
> as it is the last package to depend upon the x-dev transitional package
> instead of x11proto-core-dev.
Thanks for your report. I just uploaded a fixed version of this package and
missed this bug report when I was adding the changelog closers. Thanks!
- David Nusinow
--- End Message ---
