Re: Slow XVideo

2005-04-02 Thread Markus Walser
Hi Michel Direct hit! Thank you very much for spotting this out. When having the option "vga=785" in the kernel boot parameter, /proc/mtrr looked like: reg00: base=0x ( 0MB), size= 512MB: write-back, count=1 reg01: base=0x1e00 ( 480MB), size= 32MB: uncachable, count=1 reg02: base=0

Bug#302718: Problems with last upload of xfree in testing

2005-04-02 Thread LENHOF Jean-Yves
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Hi guys, Since the last upgrade, X does'nt work anymore on my desktop (I use a laptop just now to catch some errors). Sometimes gdm come on the screen, sometimes not... But when I have gdm, I try to log in and the screen vanish. The problem j

Processed: Re: Bug#246091: libxft-dev: xft-config doesn't output version

2005-04-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 246091 - help Bug#246091: libxft-dev: xft-config doesn't output version Tags were: upstream help Tags removed: help > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrat

Bug#281203: marked as done (libxft2: SEGV in XftCharIndex() at 'if (!font->hash_value) return 0;')

2005-04-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:30:27 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing bug from unresponsive submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#246891: marked as done (libxft-dev: problem upgrading from 2.1.2-5)

2005-04-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:42:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing unfixable bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#271760: marked as done (libxft-dev: upgrade from 2.1.2-4 to 2.1.2-6 fails)

2005-04-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:42:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing unfixable bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#237511: marked as done (libxft-dev: upgrading from libxft-dev 2.1.2-[1-5] doesn't work due to dpkg-divert being run before unpack)

2005-04-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:42:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing unfixable bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#241008: marked as done (libxft-dev: error during upgrade)

2005-04-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:42:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing unfixable bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#237509: marked as done (libxft-dev: upgrading from libxft-dev 2.1.2-[1-5] doesn't work due to dpkg-divert being run before unpack)

2005-04-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:42:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing unfixable bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#240302: marked as done (libxft2-dev doesn't install)

2005-04-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:42:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing unfixable bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#247645: marked as done (libxft-dev: apt-get upgrade reports unmet dependencies)

2005-04-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:42:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing unfixable bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#272744: marked as done (libxft-dev: error on upgrade from 2.1.2-4 to 2.1.2-6)

2005-04-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:42:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing unfixable bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#246091: marked as done (libxft-dev: xft-config doesn't output version)

2005-04-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:26:52 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#246091: libxft-dev: xft-config doesn't output version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#296719: xlibs-data: zh_TW.UTF-8/XLC_LOCALE is broken after upgrading 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7

2005-04-02 Thread Tetralet
After upgrade xlibs-data to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12, We think that this problem was fixed. But we find that /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/ja_JP.UTF-8/XLC_LOCALE is broken, too. Please consider to fix it. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Bug#273571: xserver-xfree86: Widescreen modes patch

2005-04-02 Thread Jonathan Polley
After not thinking about it for a shamefully long time, I would like to submit a new version of the patch that only has a rather reasonable number of likely-looking modelines, as opposed to the several hundred in the prior version. At the very least, this is a much saner starting point and if peop

Bug#296719: xlibs-data: zh_TW.UTF-8/XLC_LOCALE is broken after upgrading 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7

2005-04-02 Thread Denis Barbier
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:19:20AM +0800, Tetralet wrote: > After upgrade xlibs-data to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12, > We think that this problem was fixed. > But we find that /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/ja_JP.UTF-8/XLC_LOCALE is > broken, too. > Please consider to fix it. Thanks! Do you have a patch? Denis

Bug#165619: What youve always needed.

2005-04-02 Thread Simon
Hello, Check your important message below: http://caclickbutton.info Bye, Jimmie Lewis pink plum cyan strawberry I don't miss jumping for three or four weeks.. Early last month I was still missing sleeping.. Those janitors aren't missing sleeping right now.. Luke is missing jumping today..

Bug#296719: xlibs-data: zh_TW.UTF-8/XLC_LOCALE is broken after upgrading 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7

2005-04-02 Thread Tetralet
Denis Barbier wrote: On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:19:20AM +0800, Tetralet wrote: After upgrade xlibs-data to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12, We think that this problem was fixed. But we find that /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/ja_JP.UTF-8/XLC_LOCALE is broken, too. Please consider to fix it. Thanks! Do you have

Bug#296719: xlibs-data: zh_TW.UTF-8/XLC_LOCALE is broken after upgrading 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7

2005-04-02 Thread Tetralet
Denis Barbier wrote: On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:19:20AM +0800, Tetralet wrote: After upgrade xlibs-data to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12, We think that this problem was fixed. But we find that /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/ja_JP.UTF-8/XLC_LOCALE is broken, too. Please consider to fix it. Thanks! Do you have