Your message dated Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:42:08 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing unfixable bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2004 01:36:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 01 18:36:11 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BK5tq-0005r4-00; Sat, 01 May 2004 18:36:11 -0700
Received: from 00ff00 (defense-5-81-56-10-142.fbx.proxad.net [81.56.10.142])
by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP
id 700CFC405D; Sun, 2 May 2004 03:36:09 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 03:33:41 +0200
From: bradok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-x@lists.debian.org
Subject: libxft-dev
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: libxft-dev
Version: 2.1.2-6
dpkg --list|grep libxft-dev
ii libxft-dev 2.1.2-5 =
FreeType-based font drawing library for X (development files)
** my primari objectif as install amule-2.0.0rc3=20
i upgrade some 400 packages... after upgrade, the package libxft-dev_2.1.2-=
6_i386.deb dont want unpack and indicate somme error:
# apt-get install libwxgtk2.4
Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait
Construction de l'arbre des d=E9pendances... Fait
libwxgtk2.4 est d=E9j=E0 la plus r=E9cente version disponible.
Vous pouvez lancer =AB=A0apt-get -f install=A0=BB pour corriger ces probl=
=E8mes=A0:
Les paquets suivants contiennent des d=E9pendances non satisfaites=A0:
libxft-dev: D=E9pend: libxft2 (=3D 2.1.2-5) mais 2.1.2-6 devra =EAtre ins=
tall=E9
E: D=E9pendances non satisfaites. Essayez =AB=A0apt-get -f install=A0=BB sa=
ns paquet
(ou indiquez une solution).
------------------------------
# apt-get -f install
Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait
Construction de l'arbre des d=E9pendances... Fait
Correction des d=E9pendances... Fait
Les paquets suppl=E9mentaires suivants seront install=E9s=A0:=20
libxft-dev
Les paquets suivants seront mis =E0 jour=A0:
libxft-dev
1 mis =E0 jour, 0 nouvellement install=E9s, 0 =E0 enlever et 188 non mis =
=E0 jour.
336 partiellement install=E9s ou enlev=E9s.
Il est n=E9cessaire de prendre 0o/60,2ko dans les archives.
Apr=E8s d=E9paquetage, 4096o d'espace disque seront lib=E9r=E9s.
Souhaitez-vous continuer=A0? [O/n]=20
(Lecture de la base de donn=E9es... 87173 fichiers et r=E9pertoires d=E9j=
=E0 install=E9s.)
Pr=E9paration du remplacement de libxft-dev 2.1.2-5 (en utilisant .../libxf=
t-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb) ...
diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h to /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft=
/Xft1.h by libxft-dev
Removing `diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h to /usr/X11R6/inclu=
de/X11/Xft/Xft1.h by libxft-dev'
dpkg-divert: rename involves overwriting `/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h'=
with
different file `/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h', not allowed
dpkg : erreur de traitement de /var/cache/apt/archives/libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i=
386.deb (--unpack) :
le sous-processus pre-installation script a retourn=E9 une erreur de sorti=
e d'=E9tat 2
Des erreurs ont =E9t=E9 rencontr=E9es pendant l'ex=E9cution :
/var/cache/apt/archives/libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
------------------------------
# apt-cache show libxft-dev
Package: libxft-dev
Priority: optional
Section: libdevel
Installed-Size: 220
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force <debian-x@lists.debian.org>
Architecture: i386
Source: xft
Version: 2.1.2-6
Provides: libxft2-dev
Depends: libxft2 (=3D 2.1.2-6), libc6-dev | libc-dev, libfontconfig1-dev, l=
ibfreetype6-dev, x-dev, libx11-dev, libxrender-dev, zlib1g-dev | libz-dev
Conflicts: libxft2-dev, xlibs-dev (<< 4.3.0)
Filename: pool/main/x/xft/libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb
Size: 60162
MD5sum: 2c348c3eb30d54332cf1b2cd75c2131d
Description: FreeType-based font drawing library for X (development files)
Xft provides a client-side font API for X applications, making the FreeType
font rasterizer available to X clients. Fontconfig is used for font
specification resolution. Where available, the RENDER extension handles
glyph drawing; otherwise, the core X protocol is used.
.
This package provides a static library and C header files.
Package: libxft-dev
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: libdevel
Installed-Size: 224
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force <debian-x@lists.debian.org>
Source: xft
Version: 2.1.2-5
Provides: libxft2-dev
Depends: libxft2 (=3D 2.1.2-5), libc6-dev | libc-dev, libfontconfig1-dev, l=
ibfreetype6-dev, zlib1g-dev | libz-dev, libxrender-dev, xlibs-dev
Conflicts: libxft2-dev
Description: FreeType-based font drawing library for X (development files)
Xft provides a client-side font API for X applications, making the FreeType
font rasterizer available to X clients. Fontconfig is used for font
specification resolution. Where available, the RENDER extension handles
glyph drawing; otherwise, the core X protocol is used.
.
This package provides a static library and C header files.
---------------------------
# dpkg --status libxft-dev
Package: libxft-dev
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: libdevel
Installed-Size: 224
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force <debian-x@lists.debian.org>
Source: xft
Version: 2.1.2-5
Provides: libxft2-dev
Depends: libxft2 (=3D 2.1.2-5), libc6-dev | libc-dev, libfontconfig1-dev, l=
ibfreetype6-dev, zlib1g-dev | libz-dev, libxrender-dev, xlibs-dev
Conflicts: libxft2-dev
Description: FreeType-based font drawing library for X (development files)
Xft provides a client-side font API for X applications, making the FreeType
font rasterizer available to X clients. Fontconfig is used for font
specification resolution. Where available, the RENDER extension handles
glyph drawing; otherwise, the core X protocol is used.
.
This package provides a static library and C header files.
------------------------
apt-get update
------------------------
# apt-get upgrade
Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait
Construction de l'arbre des d=E9pendances... Fait
Vous pouvez lancer =AB=A0apt-get -f install=A0=BB pour corriger ces probl=
=E8mes.
Les paquets suivants contiennent des d=E9pendances non satisfaites=A0:
libxft-dev: D=E9pend: libxft2 (=3D 2.1.2-5) mais 2.1.2-6 est install=E9
E: D=E9pendances manquantes. Essayez d'utiliser l'option -f.
------------------------
my /etc/apt/sources.list
#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-1 (20021=
218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-7 (20021=
218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-6 (20021=
218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-5 (20021=
218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-4 (20021=
218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-3 (20021=
218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-2 (20021=
218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
## Montage d'une image CD
#deb file:/mnt/iso/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main <<<<
#deb file:/tmp stable main contrib non-free :o
#deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian /cdrom/ :o
### stable
#deb http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian-non-US woody/non-US main contrib non-f=
ree
#deb http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian woody main contrib non-free
#deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
#deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
##
# amule
deb http://debian.thermoman.de/ woody amule wxwindows2.4
### testing
#deb http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
### unstable
deb http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib non=
-free
#deb http://security.debian.org/ unstable/updates main contrib non-free
### other
# vlc
#deb http://www.videolan.org/pub/videolan/debian $(ARCH)/
#deb-src http://www.videolan.org/pub/videolan/debian sources/
# amule
deb http://gunnm.org/~soda/ unstable main contrib
deb-src http://gunnm.org/~soda/ unstable main contrib
# http://eimbox.org/~eim/stuff/development/debdev/wmaker/i386/
#deb http://eimbox.org/~eim/stuff/development/debdev/wmaker/ i386/
--------------------
this line is not an unstable by i try without it=20
>>deb http://debian.thermoman.de/ woody amule wxwindows2.4
-----------------
I am using Debian sid whith a kernel from www.kernel.org and patch 'mm3'
# uname -a
Linux 00ff00 2.6.5-mm3 #2 Sun Apr 11 07:15:56 CEST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
# dpkg -s libc6 | grep ^Version
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 237509-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 15:42:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 07:42:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHklk-0002N4-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 07:42:40 -0800
Received: from cpe-65-26-182-85.indy.res.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net)
[65.26.182.85]
by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHklj-0007N6-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 08:42:39 -0700
Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1D8FE68C019; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:42:08 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:42:08 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing unfixable bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This bug is unfixable without an addition to dpkg's feature set, which
wouldn't do any good for xft versions 2.1.2-[12345] anyway, all of which
have long since expired from Debian testing and unstable.
For details on why I can't fix this bug, please see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D237509&msg=3D44
Closing this bug (and the many duplicate reports merged with it).
--=20
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux | Yeah, that's what Jesus would do.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Jesus would bomb Afghanistan. Yeah.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
--eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkJOvU8ACgkQ6kxmHytGonwVIwCfcFJksR6P9msKp+aYu4l4D+he
BkYAoJR304l4frBxieSHqNRruobX1ycw
=IkK1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
