Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
suse-linux-e@suse.com mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is a list of the command addresses supported:
Send mail to the following for info and FAQ for this list:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL P
Author: branden
Date: 2004-04-23 00:44:56 -0500 (Fri, 23 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1304
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff
Log:
Revert patch from XFree86 CVS upstream authored by David Dawes after the
XFree86 license. Reportedly, all changes by Dav
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:14:55PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:21:00PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > This looks like exactly the same pair of video cards the submitter had
> > -- at the same PCI bus addresses, no less.
> >
> > What's *your* configuration? Pl
Author: branden
Revision: 1190
Property Name: svn:log
New Property Value:
Grab patches from upstream CVS HEAD (not under X-Oz or XFree86 1.1
license) that fix loud chatter from Linux 2.6 such as:
"atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn't access hardware directly.".
+ Do the Linux KDKBDREP ioc
Author: branden
Date: 2004-04-23 01:00:04 -0500 (Fri, 23 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1305
Added:
trunk/debian/patches/088_fix_keyboard_rate_ioctls.diff
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Fix AT keyboard rate I/O controls by operating on the actual console file
descriptor, not on file descript
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> It really sounds as if you are running into more/less expected problems
> with applications (not particularly xterm) that do not work with UTF-8.
Sure - as I said my belover MC is one of them. BUt I wanted to give
the transition a start, once Debian cha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> # fixed in Debian X Strike Force XFree86 repository; to view, run "svn diff
> -r 1304:1305 svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86"
> tags 224909 + pending
Bug#224909: xserver-xfree8
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 07:29:04AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
> > It really sounds as if you are running into more/less expected problems
> > with applications (not particularly xterm) that do not work with UTF-8.
> Sure - as I said my belover MC is o
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > *utf8: 2
> >
> > differs from -u8 command line option. If I understand the manual right
> > this should not be the case.
>
> I'll take another look this afternoon. It occurs to me that your environment
> was perhaps the UTF-8 flavor rather than t
Author: fabbione
Date: 2004-04-23 05:41:46 -0500 (Fri, 23 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1306
Modified:
trunk/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
trunk/debian/MANIFEST.hurd-i386
trunk/debian/MANIFEST.i386
trunk/debian/MANIFEST.ia64
trunk/debian/MANIFEST.sparc
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xs
Author: fabbione
Date: 2004-04-23 06:27:55 -0500 (Fri, 23 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1307
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/patches/104_sparc_fix_GL_library.diff
Log:
Fix 104_sparc_fix_GL_library.diff to compile lib/GL/glx/glxext.c on non-sparc
architectures and removed unrequired #
Author: fabbione
Date: 2004-04-23 08:02:56 -0500 (Fri, 23 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1308
Added:
trunk/debian/patches/913_debian_remove_code_ref_to_object_code_files.diff
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Add patch #913 to remove references to object code files inside the source
tree and be
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote:
> Author: fabbione
> Date: 2004-04-23 08:02:56 -0500 (Fri, 23 Apr 2004)
> New Revision: 1308
>
> Added:
>trunk/debian/patches/913_debian_remove_code_ref_to_object_code_files.d=
> iff
> Modified:
>trunk/debian/changelog
> Log:
Are you ready to boost your serx life?
get super viakgra at only 3 dol!
http://superdr.com/sv/index.php?pid=eph9058
Hi all,
I just commited a bunch of changes to the svn repo.
Since these changes affects specific architectures (even if the changes
are trivial) i would like to at least a build report on the following
archs:
alpha, hurd-i386, i386 (*), ia64 and sparc
(*) I did test i386 but another shot
Recebemos a sua mensagem.
Assim que possível terá uma resposta do nosso Serviço de Assistência a Clientes.
A equipa infoxadrez.com
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 03:31:20PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > I just commited a bunch of changes to the svn repo.
> > Since these changes affects specific architectures (even if the changes
> > are trivial) i would li
Author: branden
Revision: 1306
Property Name: svn:log
New Property Value:
Update MANIFEST and xserver-xfree86.install files for alpha, hurd-i386, i386,
ia64 and sparc to reflect the removal of files containing object code with no
corresponding source.
changeset: follows 1294
Author: branden
Revision: 1294
Property Name: svn:log
New Property Value:
Re-christen next release as 4.3.0.dfsg.1, which uses a regenerated
.orig.tar.gz (maintained outside SVN). (Closes: #242865)
Update patch #025 to stop patching one of the files removed due to #242865.
changeset: followed b
Author: branden
Date: 2004-04-23 10:48:07 -0500 (Fri, 23 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1309
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Give fabbione credit for assisting with the object code removal.
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
---
Author: branden
Revision: 1307
Property Name: svn:log
New Property Value:
Fix 104_sparc_fix_GL_library.diff to compile lib/GL/glx/glxext.c on non-SPARC
architectures. Remove unneeded #else #endif block.
changeset: follows 1236
test: i386 build, fabbione
Author: branden
Revision: 1236
Property Name: svn:log
New Property Value:
Fix SEGV when attempting to use GLX extension on SPARC due to failure of
extension to initialize a Mesa context; patch by Ferris McCormick,
backported from XFree86 CVS by Christian Guggenberger. (Closes: #241331)
changeset
Author: branden
Date: 2004-04-23 10:53:21 -0500 (Fri, 23 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1310
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Move item to the joint branden-fabbione section, since fabbione made it
actually work on non-SPARC machines.
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
Author: branden
Revision: 1294
Property Name: svn:log
New Property Value:
Re-christen next release as 4.3.0.dfsg.1, which uses a regenerated
.orig.tar.gz (maintained outside SVN). (Closes: #242865)
Update patch #025 to stop patching one of the files removed due to #242865.
changeset: followed b
Author: branden
Revision: 1306
Property Name: svn:log
New Property Value:
Update MANIFEST and xserver-xfree86.install files for alpha, hurd-i386, i386,
ia64 and sparc to reflect the removal of files containing object code with no
corresponding source.
changeset: follows 1294, followed by 1308
Author: branden
Revision: 1308
Property Name: svn:log
New Property Value:
Add Debian-specific patch #913 to remove references to object code files
inside the source tree, fixing FTBFS.
changeset: follows 1294, 1306
test: i386 build, fabbione
Author: branden
Date: 2004-04-23 11:00:57 -0500 (Fri, 23 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1311
Modified:
trunk/debian/patches/913_debian_remove_code_ref_to_object_code_files.diff
Log:
Add patch annotation.
Add Id keyword and set svn:keywords property to "Id".
changeset: follows 1294, 1306, 1308
Modi
Author: branden
Revision: 1294
Property Name: svn:log
New Property Value:
Re-christen next release as 4.3.0.dfsg.1, which uses a regenerated
.orig.tar.gz (maintained outside SVN). (Closes: #242865)
Update patch #025 to stop patching one of the files removed due to #242865.
changeset: followed b
Author: branden
Revision: 1306
Property Name: svn:log
New Property Value:
Update MANIFEST and xserver-xfree86.install files for alpha, hurd-i386, i386,
ia64 and sparc to reflect the removal of files containing object code with no
corresponding source.
changeset: follows 1294, followed by 1308, 13
Author: branden
Revision: 1308
Property Name: svn:log
New Property Value:
Add Debian-specific patch #913 to remove references to object code files
inside the source tree, fixing FTBFS.
changeset: follows 1294, 1306; followed by 1308
test: i386 build, fabbione
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 08:36:19PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
>
> Around 16 o'clock on Apr 21, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > In the source file
> > :
>
> I'll note that the version of KDKBDREP_ioctl_ok in X.Org CVS does:
>
> static int
> KDKBDREP_ioctl_ok(int rate, int delay) {
> #if defined(K
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> # debian/control issue; not upstream
> tags 242830 - upstream
Bug#242830: libxtst-dev: XTest.h #includes X11/extensions/XInput.h without
depending on libxi-dev
Tags were: pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 224909 xserver-xfree86: [os-support/linux] kernel complains about
> XFree86 accessing hardware directly
Bug#224909: xserver-xfree86: [core server] kernel complains about XFree86
accessing hardware directly
Changed Bug title.
> # XKB data come
reassign 198037 xserver-xfree86
tag 198037 + moreinfo
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:26:43AM +0200, Gerard Sanromà Güell wrote:
> Package: XFree86
> Version: 4.2.1-6
[...]
> I reach to view the KDE screen but it crashes when is initializing
> peripherals because of a signal 11 caught.
> The curio
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 198037 xserver-xfree86
Bug#198037: xserver-xfree86: [vesa] SEGV when starting on ATI unknown chipset
(0x514d)
Bug reassigned from package `xfree86' to `xserver-xfree86'.
> tag 198037 + moreinfo
Bug#198037: xserver-xfree86: [vesa] SEGV when st
As of XFree86 4.3.0, the xftcache executable is no longer shipped as
part of the Debian packages (in fact, it isn't compiled anymore in the
upstream build process).
XFree86 4.3.0-7 is now in Debian unstable (sid) and testing (sarge).
That which is not built cannot segfault.
Closing this bug as r
tag 213267 + moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 02:14:57PM -0300, Marco Figueira wrote:
> Package: XFree86
> Version: 4.1.0.1
>
> rouxinol:~# uname -a
> Linux rouxinol.proderj.rj.gov.br 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son
> Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i686 unknown
> rouxinol:~#
Can you please describe the pr
tag 205129 + moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 12:00:55AM +0200, Goldfinger wrote:
> Package: XFree86
> Version 4.1.0.1
>
>
> I use graphics card ATI RADEON 7500 built by ATI.
> After installation Debian 3.0 r1 and windowmaker I wrote in text mode
> "startx" and mistake appeared, (Fatal se
tag 213851 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 08:28:54PM -0700, Mason Thomas wrote:
> Package: xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-11
>
> After upgrading from xfree86 4.2.1-6 to xfree86 4.2.1-11 (during an
> apt-get upgrade), I have encountered font problems with various X
> packages.
tag 220515 + moreinfo
thanks
> Harware autodetect is a very welcome feature. Unfortunately,
> autodetect of my video card (S3) apparently didn't work, or Xfree
> configuration didn't see it, I had to enter it by hand. It would be
> really nice to have a kernel with XFS built in, either 2.6.x or
tag 222976 + moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 02:09:55PM +0100, Georges Herfeld wrote:
> Package: XFree86
> Version: 4.1.0.1
>
> X is not starting please help me
[...]
> (--) PCI:*(1:0:0) Matrox MGA G400 AGP rev 133, Mem @ 0xf600/25,
> 0xf500/
[...]
> (**) MGA(0): Option "UseFBDev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 205129 + moreinfo
Bug#205129: XFree86 and ATI Radeon 7500. (2)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 213267 + moreinfo
Bug#213267: xfree86 problems
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database
Author: branden
Date: 2004-04-23 12:52:46 -0500 (Fri, 23 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1312
Modified:
trunk/debian/TODO
Log:
Document bug number corresponding to Sven Luther's DDK patch.
Modified: trunk/debian/TODO
===
--- trunk/debian
clone 40667 -1
tag -1 - wontfix
submitter -1 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
close 40667
thanks
Well, the 3.x-era XFree86 LinkKit is dead (and XFree86 3.x is neither
maintained upstream nor by Debian anymore), but the XFree86 DDK has
arisen to take its place.
In fact, the following item is on the
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 08:57:47PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> Hi Juliusz,
> thanks for the information. Im already in the process of
> testing the patches based on DanielS X4.3 packageds and fixing a bunch of
> small issues to prepare a more complete report to the X people
tag 29194 + wontfix
thanks
Well, after almost five and a half years, this idea still hasn't caught
on in Debian.
It may be unwise to not physically pack copyright info into every .deb,
but as for the changelog, well, that's probably a matter of taste.
I will note that if debhelper were to do thi
retitle 220493 xfree86: please package XFree86 4.4
tag 220493 + wontfix
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:34:50AM +0100, Uwe Storbeck wrote:
> in general I'm a friend of the somewhat conservative strategie of the
> Debian project, but ...
>
> The XFree86 project is going to release version 4.4 of it's s
close 205564
merge 199111 205564
thanks
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:03:04PM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> > severity 199111 wishlist
> Bug#199111: xfs: taking Juliu
tag 227005 - patch
tag 227005 + moreinfo
retitle 227005 xfree86: build XDirectFB X server
thanks
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 04:24:54PM +0100, Micha Nelissen wrote:
> I have also submitted a RFP item on wnpp for this: #225010, because this
> patch makes a XDirectFB executable which is a different X se
Your message dated Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:04:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#201871: Problems with XFree86 in Debian Woody
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
tag 233569 + wontfix
thanks
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 12:56:21AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 19:12, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:05:55PM -0500, xavier wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there a drawback in doing such thing ?
> >
> > I don't know. Possibly reso
Your message dated Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:05:31 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 213851 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#213851: Updating xfree86 on testing breaks some fonts
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 220515 + moreinfo
Bug#220515: debian installer
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 222976 + moreinfo
Bug#222976: pb matrox G450
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 06:14:01PM +0200, Joerg Friedrich wrote:
> first, this restriction seems not to work, I get dri as an option.
It's not supposed to be removed from the option list, just not enabled
by default.
> second, I try to get the xserver run with my Ultra60/Elite3D (sunffb)
> but X
On Friday 23 April 2004 19:59, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Basically, it's a patch for the xfree86 source package generating a
> > XDirectFB binary. Only this binary is different from the ordinary
> > xserver-xfree86 installation.
>
> Er, uh, where's the patch?
Sorry, here. Taken from
http://dire
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 29194 + wontfix
Bug#29194: xfree86: have all XFree86 packages symlink to xfree86-common for
copyright and changelog(s)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 40667 -1
Bug#40667: xfree86: would like X server LinkKit package
Bug 40667 cloned as bug 245541.
> tag -1 - wontfix
Bug#245541: xfree86: would like X server LinkKit package
Tags were: wontfix
Tags removed: wontfix
> submitter -1 Sven Luther <[EM
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0-7
Severity: minor
I'm not sure if this is the right place to report this kind of "bug", but I
just noticed that using Option "BackingStore" "on" in XF86Config does affect
tremendously the performance in certain conditions. I'm using the "radeon"
driver, I d
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:12:24AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> So technically, what we have here is two bugs. One against OpenMotif
> for depending on X internal symbols (symbols with mandatorily
> undefined behavior, at that). And one against X upstream for code
> with undefined behavior.
I do
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:48:36AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > IIRC, you generally want to use invoke-rc.d because it is cognizant of
> > runlevel policy (i.e., start service $FOO in runlevel 3 but not runlevel
> > 2, and so forth).
>
> That's true of maintainer scripts,
Your message dated Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:30:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#226162: Some patches have a name mismatch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 205564
Bug#205564: xfree86: have dexconf and xfs use Type1 font path after bitmapped
font paths
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 220493 xfree86: please package XFree86 4.4
Bug#220493: xfree86: new upstream version is going to be available, please
package it before it's released
Changed Bug title.
> tag 220493 + wontfix
Bug#220493: xfree86: please package XFree86 4.4
The
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 227005 - patch
Bug#227005: xfree86: Patch to build XDirectFB server
There were no tags set.
Tags removed: patch
> tag 227005 + moreinfo
Bug#227005: xfree86: Patch to build XDirectFB server
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> retitle 227
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 04:33:22AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Here it is. I see the correct ranges in the output below. When
> Debian Installer beta 4 is released, I'll probably do a reinstall from
> scratch and see what happens.
>
> For kicks, I just moved my /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 out of th
Your message dated Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:53:36 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re:
Driver SDK.)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 233569 + wontfix
Bug#233569: xfree86: kick MAXCLIENTS up to 512 in Xserver, xfs, lbxproxy
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> # damn typos
> retitle 180689 xserver-xfree86: [debconf] want question about mouse
> resolution parameter
Bug#180689: xserver-xfree86: [dbeconf] want question about mouse resoluti
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 245541 xfree86: package XFree86 DDK
Bug#245541: xfree86: would like X server LinkKit package
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # #201871: Problems with XFree86 in Debian Woody
> # Package: xfree86; Reported by: =?iso-8859-2?B?TWljaGGz?= <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>; Tags: moreinfo; 280 days old.
> retitle 201871 xserver-xfree86: [nv] server will not start with 'UseFBDev'
> 'true' on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 242605 xserver-xfree86 [debconf] why default to U.S. keyboard layout?
Bug#242605: xserver-xfree86: [i18n] Why american keyboard layout?
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 197156 xfree86: dexconf and xfs should use x-ttcidfont-conf font
> paths by default
Bug#197156: dexconf and xfs should include the fontpaths by x-ttcidfont-conf
Changed Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 213851 xbase-clients
Bug#213851: Updating xfree86 on testing breaks some fonts
Warning: Unknown package 'xcalc'
Warning: Unknown package 'segvs'
Warning: Unknown package 'w
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 07:01:19PM -0700, Matthew Hughes wrote:
> No, I haven't seen this in a couple of months. Thanks!
> Matt
Ordinarily I'd close this, but other people are reporting the same
problem, and very recently, so I don't think the problem
On Friday 23 April 2004 19:59, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Basically, it's a patch for the xfree86 source package generating a
> > XDirectFB binary. Only this binary is different from the ordinary
> > xserver-xfree86 installation.
>
> Er, uh, where's the patch?
Sorry, here. Taken from
http://direc
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
> What exactly *is* going on with IPv6 support these days? I understand
> it's caused a lot of grief for X.Org and XFree86 4.4, crazy breakage in
> xdm and stuff. But maybe things have settled down.
Yes i have been following the development for a whi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 172962 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#172962: xfree86: want IPv6 support
Bug#153075: xfree86: clients unable to connect to X server via IPv6
Owner recorded as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 01:58:24PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:12:24AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> > So technically, what we have here is two bugs. One against OpenMotif
> > for depending on X internal symbols (symbols with mandatorily
> > undefined behavior, at th
Author: branden
Date: 2004-04-23 17:16:08 -0500 (Fri, 23 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1313
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
(cosmetic) Technically, Branden has a PowerPC 750 processor, not a 740.
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> > Also, are you aware of the bugs being filed about the non-free
>> > microcode in the DRM?
>>
>> No, I'll look at that. You mean DRM from DRI or from GATOS ?
>
> Any flavour, the microcode is the same everywhere.
I've been trying to figure out who really holds the micro
Branden Robinson wrote:
> tag 242865 - moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 07:24:16PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> This is the list of files known to be affected by this bug:
>>
>> xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/mga/mga_ucodexch
>> xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/re
Hello Deb & Branden, too
Thanks for the e-mail below.
I don't understand your not getting more information: I sent some extra. What
I sent I don't know now - so long ago!
I've given up on Debian for the while so not to worry!
Regards
Godfrey Harrison
On Saturday 24 April 2004
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Well, the scope of this discussion is a pair of manpages, xdm.options(5)
> and xfs.options(5).
>
> Do you object to me documenting invoke-rc.d there instead of
> /etc/init.d?
Both arguments are valid imho and perhaps we can document both underlining
86 matches
Mail list logo
