Your message dated Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:30:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#226162: Some patches have a name mismatch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2004 22:05:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 04 16:05:14 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp3.libero.it [193.70.192.127]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ad68f-00077T-00; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 05:09:45 -0600
Received: from Steffi (151.41.185.46) by smtp3.libero.it (7.0.020-DD01)
id 3F6F04A601E62B2A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 12:09:45
+0100
Received: from paolo by Steffi with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian 3.0/Woody))
id 1Ad64u-00023E-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 12:05:52 +0100
From: Paolo Ulivi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Lusty & Gorgeous Software, Ltd.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Some patches have a name mismatch
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 12:05:52 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Paolo Ulivi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_3
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_3
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-15
Running debian/rules checksource on my system gives the following
results:
Applying patch debian/patches/001b_m68k_haslinuxinput_too.diff...dry run
failed.
patching file config/cf/linux.cf
Hunk #1 FAILED at 157.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file config/cf/linux.cf.rej
make: *** [debian/stampdir/patchapply] Error 1
Another run after correcting the problem shows another one:
# make sure all the patches applied cleanly
debian/stampdir/
patches/011a_recognize_glibc_2.3.2_locale_names.diff.log:Hunk #1
succeeded at 839 (offset 1 line).
debian/stampdir/patches/011_chinese_locale_fixups.diff.log:Hunk #1
succeeded at 636 (offset 1 line).
Some patches did not apply cleanly. Please investigate.
make: *** [checksource] Error 1
After investigating I found that my system sort the patches names
in an alphabetical order which doesn't correspond to the correct
order of their application. I solved renaming all offending patches
in this manner:
001a_linux_cf.diff (was 001_linux_cf.diff)
001b_damn_cpp_3.3_to_hell.diff (was 001a_damn_cpp_3.3_to_hell.diff
001c_m68k_haslinuxinput_too.diff (was 001b_m68k_haslinuxinput_too.diff)
011a_chinese_locale_fixups.diff
(was 011_chinese_locale_fixups.diff)
011b_recognize_glibc_2.3.2_locale_names.diff
(was 011a_recognize_glibc_2.3.2_locale_names.diff)
011c_recognize_ko_KR.EUC-KR_locale.diff
(was 011b_recognize_ko_KR.EUC-KR_locale.diff)
Dunno if this is happening to me only in all of the world :-)
Have a happy new year,
Paolo
--
Paolo Ulivi
pulivi AT libero DOT it
GPG KeyID: 5C4F3D94
GPG Fingerprint: 3AF7 BFA2 3DE6 6A73 5379 5E0A 0949 6A1E 5C4F 3D94
If Linux is not Unix then Windows are not Gates
Anonymous, XXI Century
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 226162-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Apr 2004 17:30:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 23 10:30:27 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net)
[65.26.182.85]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BH4VP-0002sg-00; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 10:30:27 -0700
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id AD6F5642B7; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:30:26 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:30:26 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#226162: Some patches have a name mismatch
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="w2xx78T4DcG3O+DJ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
--w2xx78T4DcG3O+DJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 08:48:24AM +0100, Paolo Ulivi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 08:31:19PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> =20
> > The debian/scripts/patch.{apply,unapply} scripts explicitly set
> > LC_COLLATE=3DC, which is the fix for this known problem.
> >=20
> > In fact, this fix was made in xfree86 4.2.1-10.
> >=20
> > I cannot do anything about this bug until I find out how you managed to
> > experience it.
> =20
> So it seems my build system is broken... Now I know how I'll spend
> the next few days after vacation. I'm sorry for the inconvenience.
Submitter said he would get back to us in a few days on 8 January 2004.
Must be a long vacation... :)
Closing bug from unresponsive submitter.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | The Rehnquist Court has never
Debian GNU/Linux | encountered a criminal statute it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | did not like.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- John Dean
--w2xx78T4DcG3O+DJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkCJUrIACgkQ6kxmHytGony7TQCeMS85s156JOQchCFAm/PHHbAR
u/8AniZswoLZIO2KwB+xrRyt3zGqUmqZ
=r/bB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--w2xx78T4DcG3O+DJ--
