-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:02:40 -0500
Source: xfree86
Binary: xlibmesa3-gl xserver-common libxaw7-dbg xlibmesa-glu-dev xbase-clients
twm xlibmesa3-dbg xfonts-scalable xfonts-75dpi libdps1-dbg xlib6g-dev xmh
libxaw6-dbg xfwp xlibs xlibosme
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174589: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174589: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174589: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#95951: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170638: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170513: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#167212: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#167212: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170510: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#175157: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168791: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170508: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174282: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174589: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#167448: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170678: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170509: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
I just want to chime in: since Xinerama support has been disabled in
gtk2, my desktop is near unusable. I have one screen smaller then the
other, so there's a "dead area" in which panel menus and windows may be
lost, and there's no way (I know of) to access them.
So yes, I *desesperately* need Xin
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#171294: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#166234: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: x-window-system
Version: ?
Severity: normal
The log file is attached.
I have a fresh installation of Debian (3.0), and I typed 'startx', but
the server crashed as you can see in the log file. (First the screen
flickered and then it returned to the command line). It says that I don't
have
Same here, it's weird libgtk2 uses patches to work around a packaging
bug.
Hope you guys can fix it.
_or_
Could you point me to a working pre Xfree 4.3 package.
I've been using http://hanzubon.org/ packages, but that site is login
protected atm *bummer* (http://hanzubon.org/Linux/Debian/HANZUB
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:00:58PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:54:49AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > For what it's worth, "in the future" sounds right to me,
> > ^^^
> > sounds better to my ear than "...future release..." :)
>
> But does i
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 01:03:32AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
...
> - add dependency on xprt-common to xprt, and update its extended
>description to describe its broken state and available alternative
>(thanks, Drew Parsons) (Closes: #170678)
Don't forget that (i
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:08:30PM +0100, Lars Steinke wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-4
> Severity: important
>
> Since upgrading to 4.2 the i810 3d acceleration produces quite unusable
> results, for instance glxgears is repeatedly copied across to whole
> screen width and loo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:46:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#177867: X Server Crash
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
I just forwarded the patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Sebastian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
>* patch #203: fix for alignment issues in Xpm library on Alpha (thanks,
> Kalle Olavi Niemitalo) (Closes: #174282)
Great! Although it was a size issue, not an alignment issue. ;-)
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:48:14AM -0600, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> Try changing the driver you use to "s3", though I don't recall off the
> top of my head how well the old S3 Trio chips are supported by the
> version of XFree86 4.x in woody (Debian 3.0).
They're not.
--
Daniel Stone
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:52:03AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:48:14AM -0600, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> > Try changing the driver you use to "s3", though I don't recall off the
> > top of my head how well the old S3 Trio chips are supported by the
> > version of XFree
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:42:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:52:03AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:48:14AM -0600, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> > > Try changing the driver you use to "s3", though I don't recall off the
> > > top of my
Package: x-window-system
Version: ?
Severity: normal
The log file is attached.
I have a fresh installation of Debian (3.0), and I typed 'startx', but
the server crashed as you can see in the log file. (First the screen
flickered and then it returned to the command line). It says that I don't
have
Same here, it's weird libgtk2 uses patches to work around a packaging
bug.
Hope you guys can fix it.
_or_
Could you point me to a working pre Xfree 4.3 package.
I've been using http://hanzubon.org/ packages, but that site is login
protected atm *bummer* (http://hanzubon.org/Linux/Debian/HANZUBO
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:00:58PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:54:49AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > For what it's worth, "in the future" sounds right to me,
> > ^^^
> > sounds better to my ear than "...future release..." :)
>
> But does i
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 01:03:32AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
...
> - add dependency on xprt-common to xprt, and update its extended
>description to describe its broken state and available alternative
>(thanks, Drew Parsons) (Closes: #170678)
Don't forget that (i
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:08:30PM +0100, Lars Steinke wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-4
> Severity: important
>
> Since upgrading to 4.2 the i810 3d acceleration produces quite unusable
> results, for instance glxgears is repeatedly copied across to whole
> screen width and loo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:46:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#177867: X Server Crash
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
I just forwarded the patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Sebastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
>* patch #203: fix for alignment issues in Xpm library on Alpha (thanks,
> Kalle Olavi Niemitalo) (Closes: #174282)
Great! Although it was a size issue, not an alignment issue. ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:48:14AM -0600, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> Try changing the driver you use to "s3", though I don't recall off the
> top of my head how well the old S3 Trio chips are supported by the
> version of XFree86 4.x in woody (Debian 3.0).
They're not.
--
Daniel Stone
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:52:03AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:48:14AM -0600, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> > Try changing the driver you use to "s3", though I don't recall off the
> > top of my head how well the old S3 Trio chips are supported by the
> > version of XFree
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:42:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:52:03AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:48:14AM -0600, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> > > Try changing the driver you use to "s3", though I don't recall off the
> > > top of my
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:20:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:09:57AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > wasteful blanks found:
> >
> > for i in ' ' ' ' ' ';do echo '|';grep "$i"\$ /var/log/syslog.0;done|\
> > grep xfs|sort -u;false
> > Jan 18 16:27:08 de
44 matches
Mail list logo
