On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Joshua Shagam wrote:
>It would be nice if the XFree 4 packages had a 'Conflicts: utah-glx' in it,
>but as has been said already, you ARE running Debian *usntable*, and you
>reap what you sow in that regard... don't take it out on Branden, please.
I told the X people months ag
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Seth Arnold wrote:
>Terry, a few quick comments -- first, Utah-glx is in the past. While
>their work may have been nifty at one point, and for people running
>3.3.x perhaps necessary, XF 4.0.1 has a *much* easier GL system.
This is about poor forethought. I complained months
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 02:38:06AM -0500, Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Seth Arnold wrote:
>
> >Terry, a few quick comments -- first, Utah-glx is in the past. While
> >their work may have been nifty at one point, and for people running
> >3.3.x perhaps necessary, XF 4.0
* Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001211 23:29]:
> I told the X people months ago not to force out utah - that's why I'm
> pissed off. An overnight upgrade of gtk shouldn't break my x server. I
> also think hiding behind the debian stand-by "it's not even supposed to
> work" is w
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Joshua Shagam wrote:
>Well, it was also a poor forethought for you to not issue a package hold on
>the XFree packages. It's easy enough to use dselect to request that a
>package not be upgraded... (hint: = key)
Who uses dselect anymore? This is about a package maintianers
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II wrote:
> I told the X people months ago not to force out utah - that's why I'm
> pissed off. An overnight upgrade of gtk shouldn't break my x server. I
> also think hiding behind the debian stand-by "it's not even supposed to
> work" is why packa
Some of you may have seen my forwarded email earlier today. In that
mail I complained about having my X install replaced with a non
functional half install onf X 4.0.1 and 3.3.6-18.
I use utah to play games, do modeling, and develop GL applications. I
am outraged that after expressing concer
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II wrote:
> Who uses dselect anymore?
Call me "Mr. Stone-age", but I do still use dselect sometimes.
> This is about a package maintianers *duty to
> account for _likely conflicts_.
Ok, this gets me a bit upset. There are always unforeseen (or ju
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Branden Robinson) writes:
> Does anyone know which driver the TurboGX uses?
>
> - Forwarded message from Ken Teague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> From: Ken Teague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: xserver-xsun drivers
> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:29:55
>By itself this is pretty odd, but #56 is simply not defined in
>/usr/include/elf.h at all. I am rebuilding right now (a 10-hour
>process) with "Elf_Rel" rather than "Elf_Rela" setup, to see if that
>makes a difference. (Seing that ARM, like i386, unlike any of the
>other processors, is Little En
* Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 00:14]:
> You're forcing people to give up performance, correctness, and
> hardware GL accelration altogether in some cases.
Aha!
We have found the root of the problem. :)
Please reconsider this statement. Who forces you to do anything? D
[note: I've cut nothing from the body of Terry's original email, only
interspersed my comments in his email.]
* Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 00:52]:
> Seth Arnold wrote:
>
>
> > Please reconsider this statement. Who forces you to do anything? Does
> > Branden force you
> but im fairly new to this so
> editing the complier flags would be
> a bit too much for me (now)
If you're not familiar with Makefiles (yet ;), you can put the line:
#define KERNEL_2_3
into the first line of your nv.h, this does the same.
I set up a page with how to get to nvidia drivers for
Hi Harald,
you need to reconfigure the pkg xserver-common
do an dpkg-reconfigure xserver-common and select 'anybody'. This did the
job for me. Be aware, it means anybody can start the xserver!
Marcus
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 07:50:54PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> Would the /etc/X11/Xwrapper.confi
Hi all,
> Why have you made the upgrade path in X impossible? You can't run utah on
> 4.0 - yet you blindly install 4.0 over every system by dependcies. You
> don't even bother checking /proc to see what card is installed. A simple
> grep of /proc/pci shows I have an AGP G400, not a V3!
>
> I h
> www.xfree86.org doesn't seem to say anything at all about Sun
> drivers.
On a vaguely related note, is there a way other than gpm to get
sunmouse support under X4?
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > www.xfree86.org doesn't seem to say anything at all about Sun
> > drivers.
>
> On a vaguely related note, is there a way other than gpm to get
> sunmouse support under X4?
I use:
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Mouse0"
Driver "
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 09:02:07AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > www.xfree86.org doesn't seem to say anything at all about Sun
> > drivers.
>
> On a vaguely related note, is there a way other than gpm to get
> sunmouse support under X4?
"Other" way? It's rather simple. Setup gpm to repeat as msc
Hi,
the changelog says:
* updated MANIFEST.{i386,sparc,powerpc}
so it was not updated for m68k? :-(
Christian
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:49:49PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote:
> I don't track him that quickly... on average I build every 2nd or 3d release
> that he makes. I'm planning a potato build of 4.0.1-11 as soon as that's in
> woody for a day or two.
Please wait for -12. -11 has some aggravating bug
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 08:20:57AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Hi,
> the changelog says:
> * updated MANIFEST.{i386,sparc,powerpc}
> so it was not updated for m68k? :-(
I don't have an m68k box of my own to build on. When the upstream version
changes (as I note in my changelog entries
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:49:14PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Not sure what the problem is here; I don't know what would make the X
> server become a zombie process.
Actually, I do know. There was a bug in the X server wrapper. It's fixed
in 4.0.1-11.
--
G. Branden Robinson |
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 09:45:17AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 08:20:57AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the changelog says:
> > * updated MANIFEST.{i386,sparc,powerpc}
> > so it was not updated for m68k? :-(
>
> I don't have an m68k box of my own to
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> 4.0.1-12 will contain only Debian-specific revisions (bugfixes).
I'm preparing an Alpha patch for -11 (and I guess -12) now. I'm test
compiling now and will probably have the final patch later today. Will
this be in time for -12?
C
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 08:59:17AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> MANIFEST.m68k for this version is on http://people.debian.org/~cts/x4.0/
>
> Was that too late? Or did I miss something else?
I forgot you told me this. In the future, please tar up your *.m68k files,
compress the tarball,
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 09:37:24AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:49:49PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote:
> > I don't track him that quickly... on average I build every 2nd or 3d release
> > that he makes. I'm planning a potato build of 4.0.1-11 as soon as that's in
> > w
Hello all,
I have been using the new X server packages, and have been quite happy,
up through 4.0.1-10. However, when I ran gdm after installing 4.0.1-11,
the image was missing - it was replaced in fact by a bit of a dilbert
comic that I had been looking at when running 4.0.1-10. Also, no
Here is YOUR chance to help a former DPL with a FAQ! :)
- Forwarded message from Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: user not authorized to run the X server
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:47:27 -0800 (PST)
Delivered-To: [EMA
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:14:13AM -0800, Benjamin Redelings I wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have been using the new X server packages, and have been quite happy,
> up through 4.0.1-10. However, when I ran gdm after installing 4.0.1-11,
> the image was missing - it was replaced in fact by a bit of
> I am seeing "user not authorized to run the X server" from xinit using the new
> Progeny X packages. I've tried editing Xsession so that anybody can start the
> server, and that doesn't help. Any clues?
Hey Bruce, are you really such a newbie that you can't read the list
archives? ;)
--
Joshua
From: Joshua Shagam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hey Bruce, are you really such a newbie that you can't read the list
> archives? ;)
Well, you read the archives with a web browser, and my web browser happens
to run under the x server that I'm not authorized to run right now. You want
me to use LYNX E
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 04:52:34PM +, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Me again, asking some nerving questions ;-)
>
> Since the system I'm trying to set up is equipped with a touchscreen, a
> mousepointer makes no sence, too.
> I tried to disable it via "xsetroot -cursor path_to_empty_bitma
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:45:10AM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
> From: Joshua Shagam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Hey Bruce, are you really such a newbie that you can't read the list
> > archives? ;)
>
> Well, you read the archives with a web browser, and my web browser happens
> to run under the x serv
* Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 01:32]:
>
> > The thing is, no one is weeding anything out. Users can still run 3.3.x.
>
> You can't install 3.3.6-18 anymore, so I think it is cutting users out.
Perhaps it is cutting out users who join the project with woody's
original
Rafal's instructions did the trick. Thanks!
Bruce
Dear all,
I updated my woody box yesterday to the newest server for XFree86 4.0.
Since then, I cannot remotely start any tools that have to connect to
the X-Client. The error message
_X11TransSocketINETConnect: Can't connect: errno = 111
Error: Can't open display: 10.0.1.4:0.0
[1]Exit
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 12:47:29PM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > Actually, I read the archives about a week ago when this first popped up,
> > and
> > didn't find the answer.
>
> When I had these problems (I wasn't paying attention when it came up the
> first time) it took me a while to find th
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:45:10AM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
> From: Joshua Shagam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Hey Bruce, are you really such a newbie that you can't read the list
> > archives? ;)
>
> Well, you read the archives with a web browser, and my web browser happens
> to run under the x serv
>> Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Terry, a few quick comments -- first, Utah-glx is in the past. While
> their work may have been nifty at one point, and for people running
> 3.3.x perhaps necessary, XF 4.0.1 has a *much* easier GL system.
Grmpf!
Do you know what DRI currently su
Lukas, I think there are several things going on at once. xhost allows
individual hosts to connect to X -- by default, X doesn't listen to tcp
sockets (the -nolisten tcp bit in one of the /etc/X11/ files) so remote
hosts will not be able to connect, with or without xhost authorization.
Also, ssh d
>> Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> pissed off. An overnight upgrade of gtk shouldn't break my x server.
As the gtkglarea maintainer (and since you hinted it's the OpenGL
subsystem what broke) I feel this is somehow my fault... could you
please elaborate on this?
-
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 04:20:30PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 12:47:29PM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > > Actually, I read the archives about a week ago when this first popped up,
> > > and
> > > didn't find the answer.
> >
> > When I had these problems (I wasn't p
xserver-xfree86-11 gives corruption on my V3 3000. Black bars run across
the top of the screen, and moving windows causes corruption. I'm running at
1792x1344 using DRI. Dropping back to the xserver-10 package (and keeping
the -11 ones for everything else) fixed things. Does -11 have a new
upstream
- Forwarded message from Ernst Sonnleitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Ernst Sonnleitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xdm don't run his start script with german settings (LANG=de_DE)
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 21:33:28 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECT
* Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 14:40]:
> DRI's implementation is orders of magnitude cleaner and it *is* a
> better option for some people (most of the people, probably), but
> brushing Utah as a thing "in the past" is, at best, cluelessness. If
> *you* had trouble setting u
Branden, could you change the error message (sorry, only root is allowed
to run X) to state that the answer lies in Xwrapper.config, or
dpkg-reconfigure ?
Thanks :)
--
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all
really impressed down here, I can tell you.''
Ernst, I *think* the end problem is, XF86 uses a different set of locale
names than FSF's glibc uses. I don't know the answer. Branden and (ben?)
have exchanged a few emails in debian-x about possible solutions/sources
of the problem. The debian-x archives may be interesting reading. Until
somethin
>> Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, I am at least partially correct in the sense that Utah-GLX does
> not work with 4.0.1. It only works with versions of 3.3.x; a version
> most decidedly much older than 4.0.1. That is my definition of 'past' --
> something that once upon a time
* Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 16:39]:
> [...] and Utah's has some advantages for some people.
And the one person who has seemed to be effected thus far did not take
the time and effort to put his packages on hold. :-P
> > Whether it is better or worse, I am not prepared to m
Quoting Christopher C. Chimelis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> To end this long reply, I suggest this: compile your own Xserver and utah
> and install it in /usr/local until things work out to the point where they
> are usable again for your setup.
What I did was use the potato 3.3.6 xserver, because xser
>
> Very interestingly, I experience a similar problem under the 4.0.1 X
> server with the game X Scavenger (xscavenger). When Scavenger first starts
> up, the outer borders of the window are leftover bits of comics that I've
> been looking at. When I start the game, though, the screen is cleared
Dear Seth,
Thank you very much for your advice.
SA> You can indeed build Branden's packages for potato, but Charl P. Botha
SA> has done this already!
I am aware of Charl's packages.
The issue is that I want to *litterally* track XFree86 CVS. I want to
be able to say ``cvs diff'' when I'm worki
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 04:20:30PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 12:47:29PM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> >
> > When I had these problems (I wasn't paying attention when it came up the
> > first time) it took me a while to find the exact thread which answers it.
> > You
* Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 18:18]:
> > That's dpkg-reconfigure, actually...
>
> "dpkg-reconfigure xfree86-common" doesn't seem to do anything for me. It
> runs, exits, and Xwrapper.config is exactly the same as it was before.
This would probably mean you set your debconf severity
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 05:54:22PM -0800, Benjamin Redelings I wrote:
> >
> > Very interestingly, I experience a similar problem under the 4.0.1 X
> > server with the game X Scavenger (xscavenger). When Scavenger first starts
> > up, the outer borders of the window are leftover bits of comics that
Actually, I even filed a bug on this. I did the investigation and
found the answer myself, dpkg-reconfigure xserver-common...
However, my issue is not HOW to fix it, but rather after fixing it
it does not stay fixed. Every upgrade requires me to again dpkg-
reconfigure xserver-common. That was the
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 06:21:17PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> * Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 18:18]:
> > > That's dpkg-reconfigure, actually...
> >
> > "dpkg-reconfigure xfree86-common" doesn't seem to do anything for me. It
> > runs, exits, and Xwrapper.config is exactly the same as
Some of you may have seen my forwarded email earlier today. In that
mail I complained about having my X install replaced with a non
functional half install onf X 4.0.1 and 3.3.6-18.
I use utah to play games, do modeling, and develop GL applications. I
am outraged that after expressing concer
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II wrote:
> Who uses dselect anymore?
Call me "Mr. Stone-age", but I do still use dselect sometimes.
> This is about a package maintianers *duty to
> account for _likely conflicts_.
Ok, this gets me a bit upset. There are always unforeseen (or j
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Branden Robinson) writes:
> Does anyone know which driver the TurboGX uses?
>
> - Forwarded message from Ken Teague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> From: Ken Teague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: xserver-xsun drivers
> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:29:55
>By itself this is pretty odd, but #56 is simply not defined in
>/usr/include/elf.h at all. I am rebuilding right now (a 10-hour
>process) with "Elf_Rel" rather than "Elf_Rela" setup, to see if that
>makes a difference. (Seing that ARM, like i386, unlike any of the
>other processors, is Little E
* Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 00:14]:
> You're forcing people to give up performance, correctness, and
> hardware GL accelration altogether in some cases.
Aha!
We have found the root of the problem. :)
Please reconsider this statement. Who forces you to do anything?
[note: I've cut nothing from the body of Terry's original email, only
interspersed my comments in his email.]
* Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 00:52]:
> Seth Arnold wrote:
>
>
> > Please reconsider this statement. Who forces you to do anything? Does
> > Branden force yo
> but im fairly new to this so
> editing the complier flags would be
> a bit too much for me (now)
If you're not familiar with Makefiles (yet ;), you can put the line:
#define KERNEL_2_3
into the first line of your nv.h, this does the same.
I set up a page with how to get to nvidia drivers fo
Hi Harald,
you need to reconfigure the pkg xserver-common
do an dpkg-reconfigure xserver-common and select 'anybody'. This did the
job for me. Be aware, it means anybody can start the xserver!
Marcus
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 07:50:54PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> Would the /etc/X11/Xwrapper.conf
Hi all,
> Why have you made the upgrade path in X impossible? You can't run utah on
> 4.0 - yet you blindly install 4.0 over every system by dependcies. You
> don't even bother checking /proc to see what card is installed. A simple
> grep of /proc/pci shows I have an AGP G400, not a V3!
>
> I
> www.xfree86.org doesn't seem to say anything at all about Sun
> drivers.
On a vaguely related note, is there a way other than gpm to get
sunmouse support under X4?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > www.xfree86.org doesn't seem to say anything at all about Sun
> > drivers.
>
> On a vaguely related note, is there a way other than gpm to get
> sunmouse support under X4?
I use:
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Mouse0"
Driver
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 09:02:07AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > www.xfree86.org doesn't seem to say anything at all about Sun
> > drivers.
>
> On a vaguely related note, is there a way other than gpm to get
> sunmouse support under X4?
"Other" way? It's rather simple. Setup gpm to repeat as msc
Hi,
the changelog says:
* updated MANIFEST.{i386,sparc,powerpc}
so it was not updated for m68k? :-(
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:49:49PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote:
> I don't track him that quickly... on average I build every 2nd or 3d release
> that he makes. I'm planning a potato build of 4.0.1-11 as soon as that's in
> woody for a day or two.
Please wait for -12. -11 has some aggravating bu
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 08:20:57AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Hi,
> the changelog says:
> * updated MANIFEST.{i386,sparc,powerpc}
> so it was not updated for m68k? :-(
I don't have an m68k box of my own to build on. When the upstream version
changes (as I note in my changelog entrie
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:49:14PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Not sure what the problem is here; I don't know what would make the X
> server become a zombie process.
Actually, I do know. There was a bug in the X server wrapper. It's fixed
in 4.0.1-11.
--
G. Branden Robinson
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 09:45:17AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 08:20:57AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the changelog says:
> > * updated MANIFEST.{i386,sparc,powerpc}
> > so it was not updated for m68k? :-(
>
> I don't have an m68k box of my own t
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> 4.0.1-12 will contain only Debian-specific revisions (bugfixes).
I'm preparing an Alpha patch for -11 (and I guess -12) now. I'm test
compiling now and will probably have the final patch later today. Will
this be in time for -12?
C
--
To UNS
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 08:59:17AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> MANIFEST.m68k for this version is on http://people.debian.org/~cts/x4.0/
>
> Was that too late? Or did I miss something else?
I forgot you told me this. In the future, please tar up your *.m68k files,
compress the tarball
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 09:37:24AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:49:49PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote:
> > I don't track him that quickly... on average I build every 2nd or 3d release
> > that he makes. I'm planning a potato build of 4.0.1-11 as soon as that's in
> >
Hello all,
I have been using the new X server packages, and have been quite happy,
up through 4.0.1-10. However, when I ran gdm after installing 4.0.1-11,
the image was missing - it was replaced in fact by a bit of a dilbert
comic that I had been looking at when running 4.0.1-10. Also, n
Here is YOUR chance to help a former DPL with a FAQ! :)
- Forwarded message from Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: user not authorized to run the X server
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:47:27 -0800 (PST)
Delivered-To: [EM
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:14:13AM -0800, Benjamin Redelings I wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have been using the new X server packages, and have been quite happy,
> up through 4.0.1-10. However, when I ran gdm after installing 4.0.1-11,
> the image was missing - it was replaced in fact by a bit o
> I am seeing "user not authorized to run the X server" from xinit using the new
> Progeny X packages. I've tried editing Xsession so that anybody can start the
> server, and that doesn't help. Any clues?
Hey Bruce, are you really such a newbie that you can't read the list
archives? ;)
--
Joshu
From: Joshua Shagam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hey Bruce, are you really such a newbie that you can't read the list
> archives? ;)
Well, you read the archives with a web browser, and my web browser happens
to run under the x server that I'm not authorized to run right now. You want
me to use LYNX
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 04:52:34PM +, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Me again, asking some nerving questions ;-)
>
> Since the system I'm trying to set up is equipped with a touchscreen, a
> mousepointer makes no sence, too.
> I tried to disable it via "xsetroot -cursor path_to_empty_bitm
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:45:10AM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
> From: Joshua Shagam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Hey Bruce, are you really such a newbie that you can't read the list
> > archives? ;)
>
> Well, you read the archives with a web browser, and my web browser happens
> to run under the x ser
* Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 01:32]:
>
> > The thing is, no one is weeding anything out. Users can still run 3.3.x.
>
> You can't install 3.3.6-18 anymore, so I think it is cutting users out.
Perhaps it is cutting out users who join the project with woody's
origina
Rafal's instructions did the trick. Thanks!
Bruce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear all,
I updated my woody box yesterday to the newest server for XFree86 4.0.
Since then, I cannot remotely start any tools that have to connect to
the X-Client. The error message
_X11TransSocketINETConnect: Can't connect: errno = 111
Error: Can't open display: 10.0.1.4:0.0
[1]Exi
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 12:47:29PM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > Actually, I read the archives about a week ago when this first popped up, and
> > didn't find the answer.
>
> When I had these problems (I wasn't paying attention when it came up the
> first time) it took me a while to find the ex
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:45:10AM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
> From: Joshua Shagam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Hey Bruce, are you really such a newbie that you can't read the list
> > archives? ;)
>
> Well, you read the archives with a web browser, and my web browser happens
> to run under the x ser
>> Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Terry, a few quick comments -- first, Utah-glx is in the past. While
> their work may have been nifty at one point, and for people running
> 3.3.x perhaps necessary, XF 4.0.1 has a *much* easier GL system.
Grmpf!
Do you know what DRI currently s
Lukas, I think there are several things going on at once. xhost allows
individual hosts to connect to X -- by default, X doesn't listen to tcp
sockets (the -nolisten tcp bit in one of the /etc/X11/ files) so remote
hosts will not be able to connect, with or without xhost authorization.
Also, ssh
>> Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> pissed off. An overnight upgrade of gtk shouldn't break my x server.
As the gtkglarea maintainer (and since you hinted it's the OpenGL
subsystem what broke) I feel this is somehow my fault... could you
please elaborate on this?
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 04:20:30PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 12:47:29PM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > > Actually, I read the archives about a week ago when this first popped up, and
> > > didn't find the answer.
> >
> > When I had these problems (I wasn't paying
xserver-xfree86-11 gives corruption on my V3 3000. Black bars run across
the top of the screen, and moving windows causes corruption. I'm running at
1792x1344 using DRI. Dropping back to the xserver-10 package (and keeping
the -11 ones for everything else) fixed things. Does -11 have a new
upstrea
- Forwarded message from Ernst Sonnleitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Ernst Sonnleitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xdm don't run his start script with german settings (LANG=de_DE)
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 21:33:28 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTEC
* Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 14:40]:
> DRI's implementation is orders of magnitude cleaner and it *is* a
> better option for some people (most of the people, probably), but
> brushing Utah as a thing "in the past" is, at best, cluelessness. If
> *you* had trouble setting
Branden, could you change the error message (sorry, only root is allowed
to run X) to state that the answer lies in Xwrapper.config, or
dpkg-reconfigure ?
Thanks :)
--
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all
really impressed down here, I can tell you.''
--
To UNSUB
Ernst, I *think* the end problem is, XF86 uses a different set of locale
names than FSF's glibc uses. I don't know the answer. Branden and (ben?)
have exchanged a few emails in debian-x about possible solutions/sources
of the problem. The debian-x archives may be interesting reading. Until
somethi
>> Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, I am at least partially correct in the sense that Utah-GLX does
> not work with 4.0.1. It only works with versions of 3.3.x; a version
> most decidedly much older than 4.0.1. That is my definition of 'past' --
> something that once upon a tim
* Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 16:39]:
> [...] and Utah's has some advantages for some people.
And the one person who has seemed to be effected thus far did not take
the time and effort to put his packages on hold. :-P
> > Whether it is better or worse, I am not prepared to
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
