>> Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, I am at least partially correct in the sense that Utah-GLX does > not work with 4.0.1. It only works with versions of 3.3.x; a version > most decidedly much older than 4.0.1. That is my definition of 'past' -- > something that once upon a time worked, but does not work any longer.
Although a very convenient definition, it doesn't work either. The point in question is GL support. Noone is even *thinking* about getting Utah-GLX to work with 4.0 (that would be a major waste of effort), but right now there are people who would prefer to use Utah over GLX for a bunch of different reasons: to name one, DRI's resource management is different than Utah's, and Utah's has some advantages for some people. > Whether it is better or worse, I am not prepared to make this sort of > value judgement. What value judgement are you talking about? This is a (measurable) technical issue. -- Marcelo
