>> Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Terry, a few quick comments -- first, Utah-glx is in the past. While > their work may have been nifty at one point, and for people running > 3.3.x perhaps necessary, XF 4.0.1 has a *much* easier GL system.
Grmpf! Do you know what DRI currently supports vs what Utah currently supports in terms of hardware and/or features? I din't think so. DRI's implementation is orders of magnitude cleaner and it *is* a better option for some people (most of the people, probably), but brushing Utah as a thing "in the past" is, at best, cluelessness. If *you* had trouble setting up Utah drivers it doesn't mean that *everyone* will have them. -- Marcelo
