Re: eo_EO added to locale.alias

2000-09-26 Thread David Starner
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:24:24AM -0500, David Starner wrote: > On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:17:45AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 04:14:34PM -0500, David Starner wrote: > > > Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases > > > for eo_XX.ISO8859-

Re: eo_EO added to locale.alias

2000-09-26 Thread David Starner
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:24:24AM -0500, David Starner wrote: > On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:17:45AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 04:14:34PM -0500, David Starner wrote: > > > Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases > > > for eo_XX.ISO8859

Re: eo_EO added to locale.alias

2000-09-24 Thread David Starner
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:17:45AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 04:14:34PM -0500, David Starner wrote: > > Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases > > for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's not correct, as EO isn't a valid country code > > (if it is, w

Re: eo_EO added to locale.alias

2000-09-24 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 04:14:34PM -0500, David Starner wrote: > Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases > for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's not correct, as EO isn't a valid country code > (if it is, we aren't using it as intended), but (Debian's) libc currently > supports

Re: eo_EO added to locale.alias

2000-09-24 Thread David Starner
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:17:45AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 04:14:34PM -0500, David Starner wrote: > > Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases > > for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's not correct, as EO isn't a valid country code > > (if it is,

Re: eo_EO added to locale.alias

2000-09-24 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 04:14:34PM -0500, David Starner wrote: > Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases > for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's not correct, as EO isn't a valid country code > (if it is, we aren't using it as intended), but (Debian's) libc currently > supports

eo_EO added to locale.alias

2000-09-23 Thread David Starner
Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's not correct, as EO isn't a valid country code (if it is, we aren't using it as intended), but (Debian's) libc currently supports eo_EO and not eo_XX, and since the short-term fix is easier for X, I f

eo_EO added to locale.alias

2000-09-23 Thread David Starner
Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's not correct, as EO isn't a valid country code (if it is, we aren't using it as intended), but (Debian's) libc currently supports eo_EO and not eo_XX, and since the short-term fix is easier for X, I