On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:17:45AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 04:14:34PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> > Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases
> > for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's not correct, as EO isn't a valid country code
> > (if it is, we aren't using it as intended), but (Debian's) libc currently
> > supports eo_EO and not eo_XX, and since the short-term fix is easier for
> > X, I figured I'd ask here first.
>
> Come up with a patch to the source, and either submit it to me or
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I mentioned it on [EMAIL PROTECTED], and it didn't sound like they would
be interested in such a patch. It's fairly Debian specific, as I don't
think anyone else has a eo_EO locale.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
And crawling, on the planet's face, some insects called the human race.
Lost in space, lost in time, and meaning.
-- RHPS
--- /usr/lib/X11/locale/locale.alias Fri Sep 22 15:30:28 2000
+++ locale.alias Sat Sep 23 22:46:44 2000
@@ -114,6 +114,8 @@
eo eo_XX.ISO8859-3
eo_XX eo_XX.ISO8859-3
eo_XX.ISO8859-3 eo_XX.ISO8859-3
+eo_EO eo_XX.ISO8859-3
+eo_EO.ISO8859-3 eo_XX.ISO8859-3
es es_ES.ISO8859-1
es_AR es_AR.ISO8859-1
es_AR.iso88591 es_AR.ISO8859-1
@@ -618,6 +620,8 @@
eo: eo_XX.ISO8859-3
eo_XX: eo_XX.ISO8859-3
eo_XX.ISO8859-3: eo_XX.ISO8859-3
+eo_EO: eo_XX.ISO8859-3
+eo_EO.ISO8859-3: eo_XX.ISO8859-3
es: es_ES.ISO8859-1
es_AR: es_AR.ISO8859-1
es_AR.iso88591: es_AR.ISO8859-1
