On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:24:24AM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:17:45AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 04:14:34PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> > > Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases
> > > for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's not correct, as EO isn't a valid country code
> > > (if it is, we aren't using it as intended), but (Debian's) libc currently
> > > supports eo_EO and not eo_XX, and since the short-term fix is easier for
> > > X, I figured I'd ask here first.
> >
> > Come up with a patch to the source, and either submit it to me or
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I mentioned it on [EMAIL PROTECTED], and it didn't sound like they would
> be interested in such a patch. It's fairly Debian specific, as I don't
> think anyone else has a eo_EO locale.
I probably wouldn't apply that patch, since glibc2.2 doesn't have a eo_EO
locale, and eo_XX (which X supports) is closer to correct.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
And crawling, on the planet's face, some insects called the human race.
Lost in space, lost in time, and meaning.
-- RHPS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]