"Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
>
> > So there is no way it can be in testing.
> So it goes stable -> woody -> testing -> sid ? Which one should developers
> run?
Stable (Potato) <- Testing (Woody) <- Unstable (Sid)
You should probably be running whichever distribution your packages are
built for
"Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
>
> > So there is no way it can be in testing.
> So it goes stable -> woody -> testing -> sid ? Which one should developers
> run?
Stable (Potato) <- Testing (Woody) <- Unstable (Sid)
You should probably be running whichever distribution your packages are
built fo
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> No, it doesn't. X depedns on glibc 2.2 (which is not in woody because of
> m68k) and it also does not build on all of our supported archs (m68k and
> arm).
Always on the small ones... X depends on glibc2.2? How could I build X on
m68
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:07:10AM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:48:32PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:28:44AM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > >
> > > > No, it doesn't. X depe
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> No, it doesn't. X depedns on glibc 2.2 (which is not in woody because of
> m68k) and it also does not build on all of our supported archs (m68k and
> arm).
Always on the small ones... X depends on glibc2.2? How could I build X on
m6
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:07:10AM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:48:32PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:28:44AM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > >
> > > > No, it doesn't. X dep
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:48:32PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> This is on ftp-master. So, yes, the old woody used to have it (when woody
> was "unstable"), but the new woody doesn't (since it is now "testing").
> "Sid" is not "unstable".
I stand corrected. I've been following the whole pools and
"Santi Béjar" wrote:
> To begin with testing (now woody) way better to put all the potato
> packages in testing. When the times goes the packages in unstable (sid)
> will go to testing.
>
> So by now I have a woody machine but if I do a apt-get update (with the
> deb files in source.list pointin
Hi everybody,
Joshua Shagam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On an x86 system running Woody:
>
> Package: libc6
> Status: install ok installed
> Version: 2.2-5
>
> Package: xfree86-common
> Status: install ok installed
> Version: 4.0.1-11
> > So there is no way it can be in testing.
> But the pack
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:48:32PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:28:44AM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > >
> > > No, it doesn't. X depedns on glibc 2.2 (which is not in woody because of
> > > m68k) and it als
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:28:44AM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > No, it doesn't. X depedns on glibc 2.2 (which is not in woody because of
> > m68k) and it also does not build on all of our supported archs (m68k and
> > arm).
>
>
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:48:32PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> This is on ftp-master. So, yes, the old woody used to have it (when woody
> was "unstable"), but the new woody doesn't (since it is now "testing").
> "Sid" is not "unstable".
I stand corrected. I've been following the whole pools and
"Santi Béjar" wrote:
> To begin with testing (now woody) way better to put all the potato
> packages in testing. When the times goes the packages in unstable (sid)
> will go to testing.
>
> So by now I have a woody machine but if I do a apt-get update (with the
> deb files in source.list pointin
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> "Charl P. Botha" wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:58:06PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > "Charl P. Botha" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:49:34AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > > > I couldn´t find a Debian-packag
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:51:15PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:58:06PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > "Charl P. Botha" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:49:34AM -0500, Branden Robinso
"Charl P. Botha" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:58:06PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > "Charl P. Botha" wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:49:34AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > > I couldn´t find a Debian-package for XFree86 4.01 neither for potato
> > > > nor for woody.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:51:15PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:58:06PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > "Charl P. Botha" wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:49:34AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > > I couldn´t find a Debian-package for XFree86 4.01 nei
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:58:06PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> "Charl P. Botha" wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:49:34AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > I couldn´t find a Debian-package for XFree86 4.01 neither for potato nor
> > > for woody.
> >
> > You should've searched a bit
Hi everybody,
Joshua Shagam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On an x86 system running Woody:
>
> Package: libc6
> Status: install ok installed
> Version: 2.2-5
>
> Package: xfree86-common
> Status: install ok installed
> Version: 4.0.1-11
> > So there is no way it can be in testing.
> But the pac
"Charl P. Botha" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:49:34AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I couldn´t find a Debian-package for XFree86 4.01 neither for potato nor
> > for woody.
>
> You should've searched a bit harder. The XFree86 packages are available on
> any woody mirror in /dists/w
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:48:32PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:28:44AM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > >
> > > No, it doesn't. X depedns on glibc 2.2 (which is not in woody because of
> > > m68k) and it al
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:28:44AM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > No, it doesn't. X depedns on glibc 2.2 (which is not in woody because of
> > m68k) and it also does not build on all of our supported archs (m68k and
> > arm).
>
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> "Charl P. Botha" wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:58:06PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > "Charl P. Botha" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:49:34AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > > > I couldn´t find a Debian-package
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:51:15PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:58:06PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > "Charl P. Botha" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:49:34AM -0500, Branden Robinso
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:49:34AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I couldn´t find a Debian-package for XFree86 4.01 neither for potato nor
> for woody.
You should've searched a bit harder. The XFree86 packages are available on
any woody mirror in /dists/woody/main/binary-i386/x11/. Look for a
"Charl P. Botha" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:58:06PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > "Charl P. Botha" wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:49:34AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > > I couldn´t find a Debian-package for XFree86 4.01 neither for potato
> > > > nor for woody.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:51:15PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:58:06PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > "Charl P. Botha" wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:49:34AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > > I couldn´t find a Debian-package for XFree86 4.01 neit
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:58:06PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> "Charl P. Botha" wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:49:34AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > I couldn´t find a Debian-package for XFree86 4.01 neither for potato nor
> > > for woody.
> >
> > You should've searched a bit
"Charl P. Botha" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:49:34AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I couldn´t find a Debian-package for XFree86 4.01 neither for potato nor
> > for woody.
>
> You should've searched a bit harder. The XFree86 packages are available on
> any woody mirror in /dists/w
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:49:34AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I couldn´t find a Debian-package for XFree86 4.01 neither for potato nor
> for woody.
You should've searched a bit harder. The XFree86 packages are available on
any woody mirror in /dists/woody/main/binary-i386/x11/. Look for a
30 matches
Mail list logo
