On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:51:15PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:58:06PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > "Charl P. Botha" wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:49:34AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > > I couldn´t find a Debian-package for XFree86 4.01 neither for potato > > > > > nor > > > > > for woody. > > > > > > > > You should've searched a bit harder. The XFree86 packages are > > > > available on > > > > any woody mirror in /dists/woody/main/binary-i386/x11/. > > > > > > Not anymore. woody is now testing, and doesn't have the new X yet. (it > > > doesn't > > > build on m68k and arm) > > > > > > It's currently only in unstable aka sid (right?). > > > > Wrong. Woody, aka testing, has XFree86-4.0.1-11. > > No, it doesn't. X depedns on glibc 2.2 (which is not in woody because of > m68k) and it also does not build on all of our supported archs (m68k and > arm).
On an x86 system running Woody: Package: libc6 Status: install ok installed Priority: required Section: base Installed-Size: 8226 Maintainer: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Source: glibc Version: 2.2-5 Package: xfree86-common Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: x11 Installed-Size: 716 Maintainer: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Source: xfree86 Version: 4.0.1-11 > So there is no way it can be in testing. But the packages are in Woody (on the x86 architecture, anyway) nontheless. -- Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF in email www.cs.nmsu.edu/~joshagam X No Word docs in email mp3.com/fluffyporcupine / \ Respect for open standards
