On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:48:32PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:28:44AM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > > > > > No, it doesn't. X depedns on glibc 2.2 (which is not in woody because of > > > m68k) and it also does not build on all of our supported archs (m68k and > > > arm). > > > > On an x86 system running Woody: > > Obviously if you installed this before the "testing" dist was started, you > will have it installed.
Okay, in this case, pardon my ignorance, but testing dist? When did this happen? :) I didn't think Woody was really old enough to warrant getting ready for a freeze... This is the first I'd heard of 'sid'. Actually, what character in Toy Story is that? > This is on ftp-master. So, yes, the old woody used to have it (when woody > was "unstable"), but the new woody doesn't (since it is now "testing"). > "Sid" is not "unstable". Okay, now I'm just confused. :) > You are probably looking at "unstable" and assuming it is "woody", when > now it isn't. Unstable is "sid". Yeah, that's what was going on. My bad. :) -- Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF in email www.cs.nmsu.edu/~joshagam X No Word docs in email mp3.com/fluffyporcupine / \ Respect for open standards