Your message dated Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:43:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363680,xserver-xorg-core: default nice value makes xorg
behave nasty.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
trator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xserver-common
Version: 4.2.1-13
Hi...
Small debconf script bug, I think.
I just did a
dpkg-reconfigure xserver-common
and changed the nice value of the xserver from -10 to 0 using debconf.
However, Xwrapper.config looke
Hi,
About 3 years ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS
regarding the nive value of the XFree86 server not being updated.
Did any of you guys reproduce this problem recently? If not, I will
close this bug in the next weeks.
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1:1.0.2-4
Severity: normal
since i've upgraded my sid to xorg (not the transition to 7.0, the first move
yet)
my system was slow, xmms would stop while changing virtual desktops, firefox
rendering
pages with shades (bb4.org/hobbitmon.sf.net) would make the sys
Your message dated Wed, 14 Apr 2004 04:07:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#243479: xserver-xfree86: Default nice value interfering
with sound using kernel 2.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
problem completely. I suspect
> this has to do with the new scheduling policies in kernel 2.6 making the
> default -10 nice value too aggressive.
>
> Is the X server hard coded to use this nice value, or is it buried
> in a script somewhere?
>
/etc/X11/Xwrapper.config contains t
the
default -10 nice value too aggressive.
Is the X server hard coded to use this nice value, or is it buried
in a script somewhere?
Regards,
Martin
-- Package-specific info:
Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/X.roster:
xserver-xfree86
X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root
Several months back there was a Debconf question adjusting the Nice
value of X, but I haven't seen it lately.
Should I expect SID's X with ATI's propritary drivers with a Radeon 9700
to use (a) low resources relative to a big compile job in an X-terminal
or (b) moderate resourc
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:21:42AM +1100, Peter Hawkins wrote:
> Hi...
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 04:58 am, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > Does the above explain the situation to your satisfaction?
>
> Yes it does. However, according to the principle of least surprise, could the
> reconfiguration scr
Hi...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 04:58 am, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> Does the above explain the situation to your satisfaction?
Yes it does. However, according to the principle of least surprise, could the
reconfiguration script avoid asking debconf questions about values which it
will not update due
h the following request:
> >
>
> Hi...
>
> Sorry, I've been busy. Here you go:
>
> xserver-common config note: Linux kernel > 2.5 detected; using 0 as default
> nice value
> xserver-common config note: setting xserver-common/xwrapper/allowed_users from
> con
: Linux kernel > 2.5 detected; using 0 as default
nice value
xserver-common config note: setting xserver-common/xwrapper/allowed_users from
configuration file
xserver-common config note: setting xserver-common/xwrapper/nice_value from
configuration file
xserver-common postinst note: not updating /etc/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 220675 + unreproducible
Bug#220675: xserver-common: dpkg-reconfigure refuses to change the X server
nice value
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
re xserver-common
I am also unable to reproduce this problem. Changing the nice value
with debconf works fine for me.
If I do not hear back from you, I will have to close this report.
--
G. Branden Robinson| "I came, I saw, she conquered."
Debian GNU/Linux
Package: xserver-common
Version: 4.2.1-13
Hi...
Small debconf script bug, I think.
I just did a
dpkg-reconfigure xserver-common
and changed the nice value of the xserver from -10 to 0 using debconf.
However, Xwrapper.config looked like this after doing so:
### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION
# Do not
15 matches
Mail list logo
