On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:21:42AM +1100, Peter Hawkins wrote: > Hi... > On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 04:58 am, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > Does the above explain the situation to your satisfaction? > > Yes it does. However, according to the principle of least surprise, could the > reconfiguration script avoid asking debconf questions about values which it > will not update due to the missing md5sum?
The XFree86 debconfage is due for a complete rewrite, at which time I will be tackling this issue, among many others. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | "Bother," said Pooh, as he was [EMAIL PROTECTED] | assimilated by the Borg. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
