Viewport 0 0
Depth 8
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 15
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 16
EndS
Package: xdm
Version: 1:1.1.11-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Trying to use xdm for the first time in a decade after sddm destroyed itself
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Xdm logged me in to some craz
811.737]
X.Org X Server 1.16.4
Release Date: 2014-12-20
[ 811.737] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[ 811.737] Build Operating System: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 x86_64 Debian
[ 811.737] Current Operating System: Linux joshua-debian-lenovo
3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt7-1 (2015-03-01
Package: xorg
Version: 1:7.4+3
Severity: normal
The compose key, where one presses a single dead key, then a sequence of
characters, has stopped functioning in the 1.6.2 RC versions of X.org
The compose key, also called MULTI_KEY allows sequences such as:
compose ' e -> e accent ague
compose /
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.3+2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The new upgrade to 1:7.3+2 version causes to me a problem with the latest
nvidia propretary driver both installing it by
the Debian way and directly downloading and installing it from www.nvidia.com.
OK, I just tested it again.
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 06:13:49PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Also, after suspend/resume (once DPMS is engaged and X does not
> recover), go to a virtual console and tell me what the following command
> line says (dpms lines at the end of its output):
> $ DISPLAY=:0
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 06:13:49PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Also, after suspend/resume (once DPMS is engaged and X does not
> recover),
Still happens.
> go to a virtual console and tell me what the following command
> line says (dpms lines at the end of its output):
> $ DISPLAY=:0 xset q
A
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 08:43:20AM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > 2) After launching X, the virtual terminals will never correctly display
> > again, whether X is quit normally or whether Ctrl-Alt-FX is used to
> > access them.
> >
>
> So you don't get any single crash because of this, right? O
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.6.3-2
Severity: normal
I have this device:
00:14.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility P/M (rev
64) (prog-if 00 [VGA])
When I suspend/resume while DPMS is engaged then the X display refuses
to recover. It is still possible
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 08:43:20AM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > 2) After launching X, the virtual terminals will never correctly display
> > again, whether X is quit normally or whether Ctrl-Alt-FX is used to
> > access them.
> >
>
> So you don't get any single crash because of this, right? O
I have started encounter two new fun behaviors at once.
1) Wine OpenGL applications crash X, producing the symptoms described
above.
2) After launching X, the virtual terminals will never correctly display
again, whether X is quit normally or whether Ctrl-Alt-FX is used to
access them.
Advice on
>
> Could you try with the "nv" driver instead? You might have to take it
> from experimental (xserver-xorg-video-nv 1:2.0.2-1).
>
I already have this version of xserver-xorg-video-nv and I already tried
with nv in xorg.conf. X starts but it's very slow
> You are using xserver-xorg-core 1.3
OK, now I can put the correct output. Here it is in the attached file
Contents of /var/lib/x11/X.roster:
xserver-xorg
/etc/X11/X target does not match checksum in /var/lib/x11/X.md5sum.
X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 2007-01-13 05:19 /etc/X11/X -> /usr/bin/Xorg
-rwxr-xr-x 1 ro
t of my
> /usr/share/bug/xserver-xorg-core/script 3>&1
> From: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:26:23 +0200
> To: Joshua Dunamis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 i686
> User-Agent: Mutt
Package: libdrm2
Version: 2.3.0-4
Followup-For: Bug #420177
As requested I put the output of my
/usr/share/bug/xserver-xorg-core/script 3>&1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-6
Package: libdrm2
Version: 2.3.0-4
Severity: important
I dont' know if the problem is depending by the upgrade of libdrm and
its changes but after I upgraded it, X crashes unable to load glx and
nvidia module. I use the nvidia proprietary driver. I read the changelog
and puted Disable "dri" becous
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:15:07AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 00:26 -0800, Joshua Rodman wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 08:08:27AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 15:04 -0800, Joshua Rodman wrote:
> > > >
>
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 12:50:36AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Joshua wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xorg-video-i810
> > Version: 1:1.5.1.0-2
> > Severity: important
> >
> > In Xorg.0.log, I get:
> >
> > Not using mode "800x600" (no mode o
The problem was fixed by setting my debconf priority to 'low'.
--
Joshua Kwan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.1.0-1
Severity: grave
I installed etch from a beta3 CD and upgraded to sid. After installing
xserver-xorg to satisfy the dependency of fglrx-driver, I got a dialog
box saying:
Empty value: A null entry is not permitted for this value.
Hitting OK just causes it
Attached as gzip'd text.
xlog.gz
Description: Binary data
xorg.gz
Description: Binary data
Package: xserver-xorg-video-i810
Version: 1:1.5.1.0-2
Severity: important
In Xorg.0.log, I get:
Not using mode "800x600" (no mode of this name)
It was working before I upgraded. I'll send the full log & xorg.conf
separately.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers unstable
AP
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 11:48:25AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 14:48 +0530, Joshua Pritikin wrote:
> > Initially, we thought it was a kernel bug but the keyboard works
> > during the system startup. If I type stuff then it appears on
> > console inte
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nv
Version: 1:1.0.1.5-2
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When I use nv driver in xorg.conf and I use X, after some minutes my system is
blocked
in every input device: my keybord, my mouse and the monitor is completly
unusable.
I must us
tags 354674 - experimental
thanks
Hi,
What's the status of this bug? It is blocking me from uploading AbiWord,
which has a RC fix or two going for it, because it won't build due to
this missing libxcursor.la.
Thanks,
--
Joshua Kwan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--uninstall (to install official
proprietary driver distributed by nvidia)
sh nvidia-official-installer (to install official nvidia distributed
driver)
/etc/init.d/gdm restart (to restart xserver with gdm)
Thanks to everyone who helped
Joshua
Jerome Alet wrote:
On Mon, Apr 17
GPL 'nv' driver can be used 'out of the
box' which is not possible at the moment. I recall that the Mozilla
Firefox maintainers addressed similar issues in the past by symlinking
from the old named components to the new name ones, maybe a similar
approach would be helpful he
odule but x won't use it. I don't have any more
time to play with his right now but I hope that this sorry situation can
be fixed by the package maintainers ASAP since it would seem everything
is there but x is looking in the wrong places for the things it needs
no
; On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 11:59:13PM +0100, Joshua
> Kite wrote:
> > I have just done a dist-upgrade on i386 to attempt
> to
> > resolve this bug and it is certainly not fixed.
> even
> > after upgrading to xserver-xorg-core_1.0.2-4. I
> still
> > get the mesag
line made no
difference. I tried copying /etc/X11/xorg.conf to my
Ubuntu AMD64 partition and X comes up although it
loads (but refuses to use) the Nvidia module (splash
screen appears and lsmod shows 'nvidia' present).
Regards
J
Package: x11-common
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: serious
Preparing to replace x11-common 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 (using
.../x11-common_6.9.0.dfsg.1-5_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement x11-common ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/x11-common_6.9.0.dfsg.1-5_all.deb (--unpack):
trying
Package: xorg-x11
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
Hi,
r300_dri.so is missing from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri, because it's not
in the MANIFEST.i386.
This is the only file I waited a long time for experimental for :(
Thanks
Josh
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT
*-Pay-Per-View Channels
*-On Demand Movie Channels
*-Adult Channels
*-Special order Sport Channels
*-Special Events
Find out more info at check4planet.info
arragon at abalone or even incarcerate as in twiddle.
to stop these check4planet.info/r
Joshua was at alkaloid when that hap
Package: xfree86-common
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
Severity: serious
I'm not sure whether this is xfree86's fault or t1-cyrillic's fault:
Preparing to replace xfree86-common 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 (using
.../xfree86-common_4.3.0.dfsg.1-7_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement xfree86-common ...
dpkg: error pro
Hey Abnar
Its been a while since we spoke about the site that I have been ordering all of
my pre_sc_riptions at wholesale from.
Did you ever check it out? If not the new link is below
Talk to you later.
Joshua Medina
check it out
http://imbalance.49dmds.com/_55d958a932f5b91262baa654773c6a8e
merge 235705 235702
thanks
Oops, David Schleef started filing a bug at the same time that I did.
Merged.
--
Joshua Kwan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: xfree86-common
Version: 4.3.0-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
David Schleef pointed this one out to me this afternoon. With dash as
/bin/sh, xfree86-common.config can't be processed. The attached patch
fixes it - basically, dash wants 'EOF' on its own
Hello!
My build of xfree86 4.3.0-3 for i386 is available, built in a pbuilder
chroot, at:
deb http://sloth.voxel.net/~joshk/xfree86 ./
The changes are signed with my key, RSA/78446F26. Enjoy..
--
Joshua Kwan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 12:34:55AM +, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> I have just started the build.
It seems that there is a problem with fr.po, sigh. But it is not
critical:
Warning:Outdated PO file: debian/po/fr.po, running
debconf-updatepo --podir=debian/po
fr.po:824:7: parse error
msgme
ges on your testimony that they test all right.
I'll try to get them to a few other people too. (Don't worry, I won't
pull a DanielS)
> Please build in a clean sid chroot, and mail the debian-x list when the
> packages are ready.
I have just started the build. We'll see wh
erver for that
version if I can still get it to crash.
Do I need to ulimit -c unlimited before i startx if I want to obtain a
coredump?
--
Joshua Kwan
pgpN4a6vA9s3K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
erver for that
version if I can still get it to crash.
Do I need to ulimit -c unlimited before i startx if I want to obtain a
coredump?
--
Joshua Kwan
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
help the X Strike Force.
A friend with a nVidia card has also been experiencing this equally
sporadically. I don't see the correlation so maybe it is not a problem
with my choice of video card? (radeon X server)
HTH,
--
Joshua Kwan
XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Debian 4.3.0-0pre1v1 20030731221840
help the X Strike Force.
A friend with a nVidia card has also been experiencing this equally
sporadically. I don't see the correlation so maybe it is not a problem
with my choice of video card? (radeon X server)
HTH,
--
Joshua Kwan
XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Debian 4.3.0-0pre1v1 20030731221840
Thank you, this seemed to fix it, although I had to do it twice.
Joshua McClintock
Systems Engineer
Singlestep Technologies
Connect. Simplify. Manage.
2320 First Avenue
Suite 200
Seattle, WA 98121
P: 206.448.9700
F: 206.448.2666
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.singlestep.com
On Tue, 26 Aug
Thank you, this seemed to fix it, although I had to do it twice.
Joshua McClintock
Systems Engineer
Singlestep Technologies
Connect. Simplify. Manage.
2320 First Avenue
Suite 200
Seattle, WA 98121
P: 206.448.9700
F: 206.448.2666
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.singlestep.com
On Tue, 26 Aug
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:48:32PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:28:44AM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > >
> > > No, it doesn't. X depedns on glibc 2.2 (which is not in woo
nstall ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Installed-Size: 716
Maintainer: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: xfree86
Version: 4.0.1-11
> So there is no way it can be in testing.
But the packages are in Woody (on the x86 architecture, anyway) nontheless.
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF in email
www.cs.nmsu.edu/~joshagam X No Word docs in email
mp3.com/fluffyporcupine/ \ Respect for open standards
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:48:32PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:28:44AM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > >
> > > No, it doesn't. X depedns on glibc 2.2 (which is not in woo
alled-Size: 716
Maintainer: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: xfree86
Version: 4.0.1-11
> So there is no way it can be in testing.
But the packages are in Woody (on the x86 architecture, anyway) nontheless.
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL
a.c (for some
reason, mga_dri.o isn't exporting those symbols).
Stencils are still broken, but that was to be expected. At least textures
work again. They still don't respond to glTexEnv* though (changing the
filters has no effect for example), but that's a relatively minor issue in
the
a.c (for some
reason, mga_dri.o isn't exporting those symbols).
Stencils are still broken, but that was to be expected. At least textures
work again. They still don't respond to glTexEnv* though (changing the
filters has no effect for example), but that's a relatively minor issue in
the
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 04:20:30PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 12:47:29PM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > > Actually, I read the archives about a week ago when this first popped up,
> > > and
> > > didn't find the answer.
> >
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 04:20:30PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 12:47:29PM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > > Actually, I read the archives about a week ago when this first popped up, and
> > > didn't find the answer.
> >
> > When
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:45:10AM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
> From: Joshua Shagam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Hey Bruce, are you really such a newbie that you can't read the list
> > archives? ;)
>
> Well, you read the archives with a web browser, and my web brow
can't read the list
archives? ;)
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF in email
www.cs.nmsu.edu/~joshagam X No Word docs in email
mp3.com/fluffyporcupine/ \ Respect for open standards
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:45:10AM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
> From: Joshua Shagam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Hey Bruce, are you really such a newbie that you can't read the list
> > archives? ;)
>
> Well, you read the archives with a web browser, and my web brow
can't read the list
archives? ;)
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF in email
www.cs.nmsu.edu/~joshagam X No Word docs in email
mp3.com/fluffyporcupine/ \ Respect for open standards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
X install
> made unusable.
Well, it was also a poor forethought for you to not issue a package hold on
the XFree packages. It's easy enough to use dselect to request that a
package not be upgraded... (hint: = key)
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Ca
nd my X install
> made unusable.
Well, it was also a poor forethought for you to not issue a package hold on
the XFree packages. It's easy enough to use dselect to request that a
package not be upgraded... (hint: = key)
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Ca
flicts: utah-glx' in it,
but as has been said already, you ARE running Debian *usntable*, and you
reap what you sow in that regard... don't take it out on Branden, please.
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF in email
w
flicts: utah-glx' in it,
but as has been said already, you ARE running Debian *usntable*, and you
reap what you sow in that regard... don't take it out on Branden, please.
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF in email
w
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 09:51:07AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> Am Friday 08 December 2000 09:33 schrieb Joshua Shagam:
> > Ah, okay, that makes more sense. The shellscript is probably the easiest
> > way in that case. Try starting up a getty using your shellscript instead
&g
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 09:51:07AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> Am Friday 08 December 2000 09:33 schrieb Joshua Shagam:
> > Ah, okay, that makes more sense. The shellscript is probably the easiest
> > way in that case. Try starting up a getty using your shellscript instead
&g
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 09:26:47AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> Am Friday 08 December 2000 09:22 schrieb Joshua Shagam:
> > On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 08:42:57AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I'm trying to run X from an init script dur
But, again, it's a bad idea to do that anyway.
Just use xdm or gdm or the like if it's that important that your system be
in X at all times...
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF in email
www.cs.nmsu.edu/~j
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 09:26:47AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> Am Friday 08 December 2000 09:22 schrieb Joshua Shagam:
> > On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 08:42:57AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I'm trying to run X fro
ing. But, again, it's a bad idea to do that anyway.
Just use xdm or gdm or the like if it's that important that your system be
in X at all times...
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF in email
www.cs.nmsu.edu/~j
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 09:54:20AM -0600, Thomas E. Vaughan wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 01:21:15PM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> >
> > I've completely lost track of where DRI bugs should go, but this seems
> > like the kind of thing which might just be due to somet
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 09:54:20AM -0600, Thomas E. Vaughan wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 01:21:15PM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> >
> > I've completely lost track of where DRI bugs should go, but this seems
> > like the kind of thing which might just be due to somet
t's
within the DRI driver that things are breaking...
Any ideas?
Many thanks in advance.
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF in email
www.cs.nmsu.edu/~joshagam X No Word docs in email
mp3.com/fluffyporcupine/ \ Respect for open standards
t's
within the DRI driver that things are breaking...
Any ideas?
Many thanks in advance.
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF in email
www.cs.nmsu.edu/~joshagam X No Word docs in email
mp3.com/fluffyporcupi
kages, especially
for every little issue which his system may or may not have (such as, for
example, USB).
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF in email
www.cs.nmsu.edu/~joshagam X No Word docs in email
mp3.com/fluffyporcupine/ \ Respect for open standards
kages, especially
for every little issue which his system may or may not have (such as, for
example, USB).
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF in email
www.cs.nmsu.edu/~joshagam X No Word docs in email
mp3.c
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 05:24:37PM +0900, Hajime Saito wrote:
>
> It appears that someone on this list has just been infected by the
> Navidad virus.
> Do not open attachments named navidad.exe. Details can be found here.
Okay, who's the closet Windows user? ;)
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 05:24:37PM +0900, Hajime Saito wrote:
>
> It appears that someone on this list has just been infected by the
> Navidad virus.
> Do not open attachments named navidad.exe. Details can be found here.
Okay, who's the closet Windows user? ;)
lush() means
that the OpenGL stuff has to stop what it's doing in order to synchronize
with the X server again, if my understanding of the DRI architecture is
correct.
__
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF in email
www
lush() means
that the OpenGL stuff has to stop what it's doing in order to synchronize
with the X server again, if my understanding of the DRI architecture is
correct.
__
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF in email
www
; will fail with an error.
The magic thingy you need is in your XF86Config file, add
Option "DPMS" "on"
to your Monitor section.
Unfortunately, XFree 4's documentation is woefully...lacking. I didn't
know this (not for lack of trying) until someone had mentioned it
; will fail with an error.
The magic thingy you need is in your XF86Config file, add
Option "DPMS" "on"
to your Monitor section.
Unfortunately, XFree 4's documentation is woefully...lacking. I didn't
know this (not for lack of trying) until someone had mentioned it
c
interface to the pagetable), so even though it has 64MB of *potential*
memory usage, only the memory which has actually been touched is actually
allocated. It's a similar issue with the X server et al.
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c
interface to the pagetable), so even though it has 64MB of *potential*
memory usage, only the memory which has actually been touched is actually
allocated. It's a similar issue with the X server et al.
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
d is to install
XFree 4 (Branden's packages would be fine) and then downloading, installing
and using nVidia's binary-only nvidia.o driver (rather than the
XFree-supplied nv.o).
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF i
d is to install
XFree 4 (Branden's packages would be fine) and then downloading, installing
and using nVidia's binary-only nvidia.o driver (rather than the
XFree-supplied nv.o).
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF i
---=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HT
---=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HT
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:20:37AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 09:17:05AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > It's not the compiled code which has to match between DRI and DRM,
> > just the interface. I'm using a DRM module compiled along with
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:20:37AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 09:17:05AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > It's not the compiled code which has to match between DRI and DRM,
> > just the interface. I'm using a DRM module compiled along with
..> be activated ?" etc
> very simple and basic.
Isn't the current X server autodetection stuff good enough? I'm sure
there'll eventually be (if there isn't already) XF86Setup for XFree 4,
which will let people graphically mangle the
..> be activated ?" etc
> very simple and basic.
Isn't the current X server autodetection stuff good enough? I'm sure
there'll eventually be (if there isn't already) XF86Setup for XFree 4,
which will let people graphically mangle the
ver(s).
>
> JFTR:
>
>
>
> If someone wants to make and distribute .deb's, he must get permission
> from NVIDIA first.
Or setup an installer-wrapping package like Netscape used to have and
Realplayer currently does have...
--
Joshua Shagam /"
ee driver(s).
>
> JFTR:
>
>
>
> If someone wants to make and distribute .deb's, he must get permission
> from NVIDIA first.
Or setup an installer-wrapping package like Netscape used to have and
Realplayer currently does have...
--
Joshua Shagam /"
e only
> contains libGL. What package is supposed to provide libGLU when
> xlibmesa3 is used?
What I do is I use the libGL from xlibmesa3 and the libGLU compiled from
Mesa's sources (which I already have on-hand because of formerly using
Utah-GLX).
--
Joshua Shagam
e only
> contains libGL. What package is supposed to provide libGLU when
> xlibmesa3 is used?
What I do is I use the libGL from xlibmesa3 and the libGLU compiled from
Mesa's sources (which I already have on-hand because of formerly using
Utah-GLX).
--
Joshua Shagam
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 05:47:02PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 10:20:38AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> >
> > And, if I'm not mistaken, imlib is one of Rasterman's over-glitzy
> > under-functional piles of code... :)
>
> Well, I don
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 09:35:50AM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 10:36:02AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > > How recent are we talking about here? I never noticed any problem with
> > > phase2v8, but in the past few days I haven't been running
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 05:47:02PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 10:20:38AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> >
> > And, if I'm not mistaken, imlib is one of Rasterman's over-glitzy
> > under-functional piles of code... :)
>
> Well, I
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 09:35:50AM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 10:36:02AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > > How recent are we talking about here? I never noticed any problem with
> > > phase2v8, but in the past few days I haven't been running much
pplications
> apart from WindowMaker, xpdf, emacs, xterm and xscreensaver, and it has never
> occured to me before to wonder how much any of these rely on shared memory.
Not at all. Shm is used msotly for things which do a lot of blitting, like
games and Rasterman's ov
pplications
> apart from WindowMaker, xpdf, emacs, xterm and xscreensaver, and it has never
> occured to me before to wonder how much any of these rely on shared memory.
Not at all. Shm is used msotly for things which do a lot of blitting, like
games and Rasterman's ov
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
