The mentioned patch I posted to freedesktop.org
was finally pushed to the current master (to be released when?)
by Alan Coppersomith.
Pushed to ssh://git.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/lib/libX11:
e7fd6f0..8f58e54 master -> master
Thank you in advance for your attention.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
I wonder if Debian packager can incorporate the fix in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690826
without waiting for the upstream fix.
I have received several inquiries when the patch will be incorporated in the
libX11 from Xorg. I have no idea myself.
TIA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Package: libx11-6
Version: 2:1.5.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Using XIM engine to input Japanese and Chinese caused events with bogus
(uninitialized) timestamps in
X e
Thank you for the response.
Julien Cristau wrote:
severity 530772 important
tag 530772 moreinfo unreproducible
kthxbye
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 02:15:45 +0900, ishik...@yk.rim.or.jp wrote:
Package: libgl1-mesa-glx
Version: 7.0.3-7
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
i
Hi, all.
I've tried to build new xterm.deb package from Thomas' tree last
weekend. I think it is 1st step for pruning xterm from xorg-x11 orig
tarball (it is listed in TODO list of xorg-x11)
Sources and binary (for i386) are available bellow:
http://people.debian.org/~ishi
e XFree86 based X server, he(they) will be
able to continue to work for XFree86 based X server.
>> * If we standardize on just one, which one should it be?
I think fd.o's modualized implemantation is the best solution.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
esn't need this change any more) Should apply unchanged.
>> > Needs a description of what it does and why, though.
>> Hmm. This was added in 4.2.0-0pre1v1. That's a long time ago.
>>
>> * patch #551: new; fix for static server build on sh3/sh4 (ISHIKAW
1:3.3.3ds1-0pre1; generalize
>> xbase-clients's, xdm's, and xutils's dependencies from cpp-3.2 to cpp; and
>> add conflict for each of these packages with versions of cpp-3.3 prior to
>> 1:3.3.3ds1-0pre1.
I believe, we should drop 003a_damn_cpp_3.3_to_hell.diff patch
with this change.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
o it may (or may not) have been rendered
>> irrelevant. ???
Xft1 is updated to use fontconfig(it is not refer XftConfig).
This patch is not needed for XFree86 4.3.0 or later.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
../../exports/lib/libXft.so.1
+ cd ../../exports/lib
+ ln -s ../../lib/Xft1/libXft.so.1 .
rm -f libXft.so.1.1
mv -f libXft.so.1.1~ libXft.so.1.1
mv: cannot stat `libXft.so.1.1~': No such file or directory
make[5]: *** [libXft.so.1.1] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory
`/home/ishikawa/work/XFree86/
e3a000)
>> +libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x6fce1000)
>> +libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x6fc63000)
>> +libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x6fc39000)
>> +libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x6fc01000)
>> +
e3a000)
>> +libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x6fce1000)
>> +libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x6fc63000)
>> +libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x6fc39000)
>> +libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x6fc01000)
>> +
t
>> >
>> > Here is an updated Japanese translation of po-debconf file.
>> > The file should go to debian/po directory of the xfree86 source
>> > package.
>> Hmm, I've already sent new ja.po file for XFree86 4.3.0 to ISHIKAWA
>> Mutsumi-san di
t
>> >
>> > Here is an updated Japanese translation of po-debconf file.
>> > The file should go to debian/po directory of the xfree86 source
>> > package.
>> Hmm, I've already sent new ja.po file for XFree86 4.3.0 to ISHIKAWA
>> Mutsumi-san di
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:11:33PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > How about to use `/var/log/fs' ?
>> I'm nervous ab
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:11:33PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > How about to use `/var/log/fs' ?
>> I'm nervous ab
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 02:31:49AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >> 1) Petition debian-policy for dynamically allocated
G-freely. Sorry for causing the 50 meg hit on those of you interested
in the orig tarball. :(
(snip)
* patch #908: don't attempt to do anything with now-nonexistent
README.DRI{,comp} files (see above)
(snip)
* debian/copyright: update the "dead pool" to add README.DRI{,comp}
(snip)
* debian/xserver-xfree86.docs.*: remove README.DRI{,comp}
--
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 02:31:49AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >> 1) Petition debian-policy for dynamically allocated
G-freely. Sorry for causing the 50 meg hit on those of you interested
in the orig tarball. :(
(snip)
* patch #908: don't attempt to do anything with now-nonexistent
README.DRI{,comp} files (see above)
(snip)
* debian/copyright: update the "dead pool" to add README.DRI
ld apply to xfs, xfstt, and xfs-xtt.
>>
>> 1) Petition debian-policy for dynamically allocated user id under which
>> to run X font servers. Username possibly "xfntserv"?
Where is a good place for home directory of this user ?
Home directory for the user is not important
ld apply to xfs, xfstt, and xfs-xtt.
>>
>> 1) Petition debian-policy for dynamically allocated user id under which
>> to run X font servers. Username possibly "xfntserv"?
Where is a good place for home directory of this user ?
Home directory for the user is not important
Hi,
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 01:17:15AM -0400, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > Changes:
>> > xfs-xtt (1:1.4.1.xf430-1) unstable; urg
Hi,
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 01:17:15AM -0400, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > Changes:
>> > xfs-xtt (1:1.4.1.xf430-1) unstable; urg
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:58:33PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > XFree86 4.3.0 does not use xftcache, xftcache is dropped
>
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:58:33PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > XFree86 4.3.0 does not use xftcache, xftcache is dropped
>
debian/xfonts-scalable.postrm.in2003-07-12 21:50:37.0 +0900
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
"$1" = "remove" -o \
"$1" = "disappear" ]; then
FONTDIRS="Speedo Type1"
- UPDATECMDS="update-fonts-scale update-fonts-dir xftcache"
+
debian/xfonts-scalable.postrm.in2003-07-12 21:50:37.0 +0900
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
"$1" = "remove" -o \
"$1" = "disappear" ]; then
FONTDIRS="Speedo Type1"
- UPDATECMDS="update-fonts-scale update-fonts-dir xftcache"
+
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>>>Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> O
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>>>Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> O
cleanup - start shipping README.fonts on all
>> architectures, and stop shipping docs that are irrelevant to that
>> architecture
>> (i.e, the relevant driver isn't even built)
README.fonts is shipped a part of xfree86-common package.
Why is it needed to include xserver-xfree86 ?
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cleanup - start shipping README.fonts on all
>> architectures, and stop shipping docs that are irrelevant to that architecture
>> (i.e, the relevant driver isn't even built)
README.fonts is shipped a part of xfree86-common package.
Why is it needed to include xserver-xfree86 ?
--
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 06:26:27AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
>> Oh. For Xft.3x it's obvious.
>> ISHIKAWA-san, can you update your &
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 06:26:27AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
>> Oh. For Xft.3x it's obvious.
>> ISHIKAWA-san, can you update your &
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:07:44AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >>>&g
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:07:44AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >>>&g
uild X server for hppa/mips/mipsel but it is just disable dynamic
loading (all driverse are static linked into single XFree86 server
binary). It is of cause works fine, and X server is needed on these
architecture.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
uild X server for hppa/mips/mipsel but it is just disable dynamic
loading (all driverse are static linked into single XFree86 server
binary). It is of cause works fine, and X server is needed on these
architecture.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ou know please teach me :-)
XFree86 dynamic loading is already supported on HPPA architecture?
If the answer is YES, we should enable hppa dynamic loading support
on HPPA architecture.I can not found HPPA dynamic loader code under
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loaders/.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
uild X server for hppa/mips/mipsel but it is just disable dynamic
loading (all driverse are static linked into single XFree86 server
binary). It is of cause works fine, and X server is needed on these
architecture.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uild X server for hppa/mips/mipsel but it is just disable dynamic
loading (all driverse are static linked into single XFree86 server
binary). It is of cause works fine, and X server is needed on these
architecture.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ou know please teach me :-)
XFree86 dynamic loading is already supported on HPPA architecture?
If the answer is YES, we should enable hppa dynamic loading support
on HPPA architecture.I can not found HPPA dynamic loader code under
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loaders/.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMA
terical raisins or whatever. Things aren't looking too bad though.
>> Would you like to join the XSF as a committer? Do any of the other
>> committers have an objection?
Welcome to join the XSF :-)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
terical raisins or whatever. Things aren't looking too bad though.
>> Would you like to join the XSF as a committer? Do any of the other
>> committers have an objection?
Welcome to join the XSF :-)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:35:36AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > 3) Purpose of MANIFESTs (I believe) are checking what kind of files
>> &g
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 04:35, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > 2) Build without BuildGLULibrary is not easy.
>> >
>> > Even if we decide
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:35:36AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > 3) Purpose of MANIFESTs (I believe) are checking what kind of files
>> &g
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 04:35, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > 2) Build without BuildGLULibrary is not easy.
>> >
>> > Even if we decide
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ----
>> rev 238: ishikawa | 2003-06-22 13:31:01 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003) | 8 line
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ----
>> rev 238: ishikawa | 2003-06-22 13:31:01 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003) | 8 line
(LDPRELIB) $(GLXLIB)
>>
>> #if GlxUseBuiltInDRIDriver
>> #define ExtraSharedGLReqs /**/
No, Please do not drop SharedGLUReqs change even if
Debian will not ship libGLU from xfree86 source.
This is not Debian specific item, this patch will fix
Linux generic problem. It should be merged to upstream.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
LIB) $(GLXLIB)
>>
>> #if GlxUseBuiltInDRIDriver
>> #define ExtraSharedGLReqs /**/
No, Please do not drop SharedGLUReqs change even if
Debian will not ship libGLU from xfree86 source.
This is not Debian specific item, this patch will fix
Linux generic problem. It should be merg
savage_driver.c
In file included from savage_driver.c:26:
savage_driver.h:19:17: vbe.h: No such file or directory
(snip)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 08:44:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > Bug #187365, #187374 are not only happned on Debian GNU/Linux,
>> > I believe
LDPRELIB) $(ICELIB)
+#define SharedXpmReqs$(LDPRELIB) $(XONLYLIB)
+#define SharedXpReqs $(LDPRELIB) $(EXTENSIONLIB) $(XONLYLIB)
+#define SharedXmuuReqs $(LDPRELIB) $(XONLYLIB)
+#define SharedXrandrReqs $(LDPRELIB) $(XRENDERLIB) $(EXTENSIONLIB) $(XONLYLIB)
+#define SharedGLUReqs$(LDPRELIB) $(GLXLIB)
#if GlxUseBuiltInDRIDriver
#define ExtraSharedGLReqs /**/
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
savage_driver.c
In file included from savage_driver.c:26:
savage_driver.h:19:17: vbe.h: No such file or directory
(snip)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 08:44:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > Bug #187365, #187374 are not only happned on Debian GNU/Linux,
>> > I believe
ICELIB)
+#define SharedXpmReqs$(LDPRELIB) $(XONLYLIB)
+#define SharedXpReqs $(LDPRELIB) $(EXTENSIONLIB) $(XONLYLIB)
+#define SharedXmuuReqs $(LDPRELIB) $(XONLYLIB)
+#define SharedXrandrReqs $(LDPRELIB) $(XRENDERLIB) $(EXTENSIONLIB) $(XONLYLIB)
+#define SharedGLUReqs$(LDPRELIB) $(GLXLIB)
#if GlxU
../../config/cf/Library.tmpl:40: unterminated #ifndef
>> ../../config/imake/imake: Exit code 1.
>> Stop.
>> make[4]: *** [Xau/Makefile] Error 1
Already fixed (svn 209)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
../../config/cf/Library.tmpl:40: unterminated #ifndef
>> ../../config/imake/imake: Exit code 1.
>> Stop.
>> make[4]: *** [Xau/Makefile] Error 1
Already fixed (svn 209)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>>>Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> I'v
-fPIC. I fixed that but unfortunately the lib uses libXau which
>> only comes in a static non-pic flavor. Is there any way to get a pic
>> version of libXau in xlibs-pic for the next version?
OK, I'll update xlibs-pic patch for 4.3.0.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>>>Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> I'v
-fPIC. I fixed that but unfortunately the lib uses libXau which
>> only comes in a static non-pic flavor. Is there any way to get a pic
>> version of libXau in xlibs-pic for the next version?
OK, I'll update xlibs-pic patch for 4.3.0.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
ment,
>> or anything of the sort. If anyone has any comments, please add them.
>> 4.3.0-0pre1:
>> * Get xcursor into sid, check separation is clean (Ishikawa?).
Current status:
xcursor is already installed into sid.
build checks are done on i386/sparc/alpha.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ment,
>> or anything of the sort. If anyone has any comments, please add them.
>> 4.3.0-0pre1:
>> * Get xcursor into sid, check separation is clean (Ishikawa?).
Current status:
xcursor is already installed into sid.
build checks are done on i386/sparc/alpha.
--
ISHIKAWA M
e out. I strongly believed the conclusion had come
out, I do not know why I'm confuse about it, sorry.
[1]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2003/debian-x-200305/msg00201.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2003/debian-x-200305/msg00203.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2003/debian-x-200305/msg00210.html
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
e out. I strongly believed the conclusion had come
out, I do not know why I'm confuse about it, sorry.
[1]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2003/debian-x-200305/msg00201.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2003/debian-x-200305/msg00203.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2003/debian-
I'm currently building the current (svn rev 195)
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian on m68k. So perhaps (if it is not failed)
I can provide MANIFEST.m68k.
My hppa station stop to work since last monday...I can not enough time
to repair it. I'll repair it as soon as possible sorry...
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
rt Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:17:14PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
>> >
>> > And the NetBSD one is *not* GNU-based,
>>
>> Actualy I agree with that.
>> > which is even more reason to split
>> > the
I'm currently building the current (svn rev 195)
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian on m68k. So perhaps (if it is not failed)
I can provide MANIFEST.m68k.
My hppa station stop to work since last monday...I can not enough time
to repair it. I'll repair it as soon as possible sorry...
--
ISHIKAWA
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:17:14PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
>> >
>> > And the NetBSD one is *not* GNU-based,
>>
>> Actualy I agree with that.
>> > which is even more reason to split
>> > the Debian-specific bi
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:27:31AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >>>>&
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:27:31AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >>>>&
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Perhaps, #820 patch is needed to add Xrender,Xft and Xcursor related
>> > defined. They are also need in #800(gnu.cf) and #824 (NetBSD.cf).
>>
header comments in patch #820)
I just wrote same idea into my TODO list
(xfree86/people/ishikaawa/TODO).
I'm planning to work for this hack on this weekend :-)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Perhaps, #820 patch is needed to add Xrender,Xft and Xcursor related
>> > defined. They are also need in #800(gnu.cf) and #824 (NetBSD.cf).
>>
header comments in patch #820)
I just wrote same idea into my TODO list
(xfree86/people/ishikaawa/TODO).
I'm planning to work for this hack on this weekend :-)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
ian xfree86 build hack */
#define RenderLibraryDir $(TOP)/../../debian/local/exports
#define XftLibraryDir $(TOP)/../../debian/local/exports
#define XcursorLibraryDir $(TOP)/../../debian/local/exports
# endif
-
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ree86 build hack */
#define RenderLibraryDir $(TOP)/../../debian/local/exports
#define XftLibraryDir $(TOP)/../../debian/local/exports
#define XcursorLibraryDir $(TOP)/../../debian/local/exports
# endif
-
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:22:00PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> Okay, just to make sure I understand the situation:
>>
>> 1) we want to be
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:22:00PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> Okay, just to make sure I understand the situation:
>>
>> 1) we want to be
atiblity between
>> + normal XFree86 server and XFree86-dbg server.
>> + We should drop this change, when we can build the Loader Server
>> + liked against external FreeType2 [ISHIKAWA
>> Mutsimi]
>> +
>>
>> The offend
atiblity between
>> + normal XFree86 server and XFree86-dbg server.
>> + We should drop this change, when we can build the Loader Server
>> + liked against external FreeType2 [ISHIKAWA Mutsimi]
>> +
>>
>> The offending cvs change
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:30PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > > I
> > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
>> > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
>> > > + #define HasLinuxInput YES
>> > > @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@
>> >
>> > This seems out-of-date?
>>
>> Hmm, yes, but only recently so.
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:30PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > > I
> > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
>> > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
>> > > + #define HasLinuxInput YES
>> > > @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@
>> >
>> > This seems out-of-date?
>>
>> Hmm, yes, but only recently so.
ould
>> Branden be credited? How much contribution gets a credit? That sort of
>> thing. :)
Ah, I agree this point of view. OK, I'll write only these thning
to debian/changelog, more details will be written to commitlog.
Thanks :-)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ould
>> Branden be credited? How much contribution gets a credit? That sort of
>> thing. :)
Ah, I agree this point of view. OK, I'll write only these thning
to debian/changelog, more details will be written to commitlog.
Thanks :-)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 171)
>> > +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-10 11:44:45 UTC (rev
>> > 172)
>> > @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@
>> > keyboard away from me.
>> >
>> >* #057_X11.tmpl_warning_fix.diff: Imake warning fix patch [ISHIKAWA
nfo->underline_thickness);
>>
>> I don't really have time to chase this down right at the moment, due to
>> exams, but if no-one figures out in the next few days, I'll have a bash
>> when they're finished.
This problem is already discussed on debian-x ML
> > +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-10 11:44:45 UTC (rev 172)
>> > @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@
>> > keyboard away from me.
>> >
>> >* #057_X11.tmpl_warning_fix.diff: Imake warning fix patch [ISHIKAWA Mutsumi]
>> > -
>>
>>
>> I don't really have time to chase this down right at the moment, due to
>> exams, but if no-one figures out in the next few days, I'll have a bash
>> when they're finished.
This problem is already discussed on debian-x ML ;-)
(A memo about this is upd
02:56:06.0 +0900
@@ -3145,7 +3145,7 @@
$(RM) index.raw file.nPS file.PS file.txt
#endif
-#ifndef MakeSimpleDoc(file,srcs)
+#ifndef MakeSimpleDoc
#define MakeSimpleDoc(file,srcs) MakeDepSimpleDoc(file,srcs,srcs)
#endif
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[E
02:56:06.0 +0900
@@ -3145,7 +3145,7 @@
$(RM) index.raw file.nPS file.PS file.txt
#endif
-#ifndef MakeSimpleDoc(file,srcs)
+#ifndef MakeSimpleDoc
#define MakeSimpleDoc(file,srcs) MakeDepSimpleDoc(file,srcs,srcs)
#endif
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[E
g about changes between libfreetype6_2.1.4-2 and -3.
I am sorry to make it get confused.
I've not checked libfreetype6_2.1.4-4 yet.
>> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 07:36:13PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 11:20:01PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >> I got a report in private mail (grrr) from a person who ran into the
>&
g about changes between libfreetype6_2.1.4-2 and -3.
I am sorry to make it get confused.
I've not checked libfreetype6_2.1.4-4 yet.
>> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 07:36:13PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 11:20:01PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >> I got a report in private mail (grrr) from a person who ran into the
>&
1 - 100 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
