>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 06:26:27AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote: >> Oh. For Xft.3x it's obvious. >> ISHIKAWA-san, can you update your "shut off Xft,Xrender,Xcursor" patch >> to ensure that the manpage doesn't get shipped? That way we can have a >> patch that's clean for upstream. The Xft.3x is installed from xc/lib/Xft1. It is not same from libxft2-dev package... Ah... OK I found a problem. I think it is upstream bug of man page name confliction. Both xc/lib/Xft and xc/lib/Xft1 contain different man page with same file name (Xft.man). When both BuildXft and BuildXft1 are enabled, xc/lib/Xft/Xft.man and xc/lib/Xft1/Xft.man will be instaled on same place with same file name (e.g Xft.3x), perhaps xc/lib/Xft/Xft.man will overwrite xc/lib/Xft1/Xft.man. I think better that Xft.man under xc/lib/Xft1 would be renamed to Xft1.man or so. -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
