e happy to have some co-maintainers for it.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e XFree86 based X server, he(they) will be
able to continue to work for XFree86 based X server.
>> * If we standardize on just one, which one should it be?
I think fd.o's modualized implemantation is the best solution.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
esn't need this change any more) Should apply unchanged.
>> > Needs a description of what it does and why, though.
>> Hmm. This was added in 4.2.0-0pre1v1. That's a long time ago.
>>
>> * patch #551: new; fix for static server build on sh3/sh4 (ISHIKAW
1:3.3.3ds1-0pre1; generalize
>> xbase-clients's, xdm's, and xutils's dependencies from cpp-3.2 to cpp; and
>> add conflict for each of these packages with versions of cpp-3.3 prior to
>> 1:3.3.3ds1-0pre1.
I believe, we should drop 003a_damn_cpp_3.3_to_hell.diff patch
with this change.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
o it may (or may not) have been rendered
>> irrelevant. ???
Xft1 is updated to use fontconfig(it is not refer XftConfig).
This patch is not needed for XFree86 4.3.0 or later.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Conflicts: gcc-3.3 (<< 1:3.3.2-0pre1)
Package: lbxproxy
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
063_fix_weak_deps.diff
update:
* add define SharedXvReqs in xc/config/cf/lnxLib.tmpl
* add MathLibrary on SharedDPSTKReqs define in
xc/config/cf/lnxLib.tmpl
* add MathLibrary on REQUIREDLIBS in
xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/OSmesa/Imakefile
cleanup:
* replace $(EXTENSIONLIB) $(XONLYLIB) to $(XLIB)
Anyone can test this update? I do not have enough time to
test it before this weekend.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
063_fix_weak_deps.diff
update:
* add define SharedXvReqs in xc/config/cf/lnxLib.tmpl
* add MathLibrary on SharedDPSTKReqs define in
xc/config/cf/lnxLib.tmpl
* add MathLibrary on REQUIREDLIBS in
xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/OSmesa/Imakefile
cleanup:
* replace $(EXTENSIONLIB) $(XONLYLIB) to $(XLIB)
Anyone can test this update? I do not have enough time to
test it before this weekend.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t
>> >
>> > Here is an updated Japanese translation of po-debconf file.
>> > The file should go to debian/po directory of the xfree86 source
>> > package.
>> Hmm, I've already sent new ja.po file for XFree86 4.3.0 to ISHIKAWA
>> Mutsumi-san di
t
>> >
>> > Here is an updated Japanese translation of po-debconf file.
>> > The file should go to debian/po directory of the xfree86 source
>> > package.
>> Hmm, I've already sent new ja.po file for XFree86 4.3.0 to ISHIKAWA
>> Mutsumi-san di
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:11:33PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > How about to use `/var/log/fs' ?
>> I'm nervous ab
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:11:33PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > How about to use `/var/log/fs' ?
>> I'm nervous ab
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 02:31:49AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >> 1) Petition debian-policy for dynamically allocated
G-freely. Sorry for causing the 50 meg hit on those of you interested
in the orig tarball. :(
(snip)
* patch #908: don't attempt to do anything with now-nonexistent
README.DRI{,comp} files (see above)
(snip)
* debian/copyright: update the "dead pool" to add README.DRI{,comp}
(snip)
* debian/xserver-xfree86.docs.*: remove README.DRI{,comp}
--
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 02:31:49AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >> 1) Petition debian-policy for dynamically allocated
G-freely. Sorry for causing the 50 meg hit on those of you interested
in the orig tarball. :(
(snip)
* patch #908: don't attempt to do anything with now-nonexistent
README.DRI{,comp} files (see above)
(snip)
* debian/copyright: update the "dead pool" to add README.DRI
ld apply to xfs, xfstt, and xfs-xtt.
>>
>> 1) Petition debian-policy for dynamically allocated user id under which
>> to run X font servers. Username possibly "xfntserv"?
Where is a good place for home directory of this user ?
Home directory for the user is not important
ld apply to xfs, xfstt, and xfs-xtt.
>>
>> 1) Petition debian-policy for dynamically allocated user id under which
>> to run X font servers. Username possibly "xfntserv"?
Where is a good place for home directory of this user ?
Home directory for the user is not important
Hi,
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 01:17:15AM -0400, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > Changes:
>> > xfs-xtt (1:1.4.1.xf430-1) unstable; urg
Hi,
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 01:17:15AM -0400, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > Changes:
>> > xfs-xtt (1:1.4.1.xf430-1) unstable; urg
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:58:33PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > XFree86 4.3.0 does not use xftcache, xftcache is dropped
>
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:58:33PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > XFree86 4.3.0 does not use xftcache, xftcache is dropped
>
debian/xfonts-scalable.postrm.in2003-07-12 21:50:37.0 +0900
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
"$1" = "remove" -o \
"$1" = "disappear" ]; then
FONTDIRS="Speedo Type1"
- UPDATECMDS="update-fonts-scale update-fonts-dir xftcache"
+
debian/xfonts-scalable.postrm.in2003-07-12 21:50:37.0 +0900
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
"$1" = "remove" -o \
"$1" = "disappear" ]; then
FONTDIRS="Speedo Type1"
- UPDATECMDS="update-fonts-scale update-fonts-dir xftcache"
+
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>>>Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> O
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>>>Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> O
cleanup - start shipping README.fonts on all
>> architectures, and stop shipping docs that are irrelevant to that
>> architecture
>> (i.e, the relevant driver isn't even built)
README.fonts is shipped a part of xfree86-common package.
Why is it needed to include xserver-xfree86 ?
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cleanup - start shipping README.fonts on all
>> architectures, and stop shipping docs that are irrelevant to that architecture
>> (i.e, the relevant driver isn't even built)
README.fonts is shipped a part of xfree86-common package.
Why is it needed to include xserver-xfree86 ?
--
erhaps
xc/lib/Xft/Xft.man will overwrite xc/lib/Xft1/Xft.man.
I think better that Xft.man under xc/lib/Xft1 would be renamed to
Xft1.man or so.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
erhaps
xc/lib/Xft/Xft.man will overwrite xc/lib/Xft1/Xft.man.
I think better that Xft.man under xc/lib/Xft1 would be renamed to
Xft1.man or so.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:07:44AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >>>&g
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:07:44AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >>>&g
uild X server for hppa/mips/mipsel but it is just disable dynamic
loading (all driverse are static linked into single XFree86 server
binary). It is of cause works fine, and X server is needed on these
architecture.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
uild X server for hppa/mips/mipsel but it is just disable dynamic
loading (all driverse are static linked into single XFree86 server
binary). It is of cause works fine, and X server is needed on these
architecture.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ou know please teach me :-)
XFree86 dynamic loading is already supported on HPPA architecture?
If the answer is YES, we should enable hppa dynamic loading support
on HPPA architecture.I can not found HPPA dynamic loader code under
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loaders/.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
uild X server for hppa/mips/mipsel but it is just disable dynamic
loading (all driverse are static linked into single XFree86 server
binary). It is of cause works fine, and X server is needed on these
architecture.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uild X server for hppa/mips/mipsel but it is just disable dynamic
loading (all driverse are static linked into single XFree86 server
binary). It is of cause works fine, and X server is needed on these
architecture.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ou know please teach me :-)
XFree86 dynamic loading is already supported on HPPA architecture?
If the answer is YES, we should enable hppa dynamic loading support
on HPPA architecture.I can not found HPPA dynamic loader code under
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loaders/.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMA
terical raisins or whatever. Things aren't looking too bad though.
>> Would you like to join the XSF as a committer? Do any of the other
>> committers have an objection?
Welcome to join the XSF :-)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
terical raisins or whatever. Things aren't looking too bad though.
>> Would you like to join the XSF as a committer? Do any of the other
>> committers have an objection?
Welcome to join the XSF :-)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:35:36AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > 3) Purpose of MANIFESTs (I believe) are checking what kind of files
>> &g
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 04:35, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > 2) Build without BuildGLULibrary is not easy.
>> >
>> > Even if we decide
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:35:36AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > 3) Purpose of MANIFESTs (I believe) are checking what kind of files
>> &g
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 04:35, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > 2) Build without BuildGLULibrary is not easy.
>> >
>> > Even if we decide
nfo compatibility between previous release.
3) Purpose of MANIFESTs (I believe) are checking what kind of files
will be installed under debian/tmp, and *.install files or
something updates are needed.
I think it is not good idea to edit MANIFESTs directly if their
cha
mpatibility between previous release.
3) Purpose of MANIFESTs (I believe) are checking what kind of files
will be installed under debian/tmp, and *.install files or
something updates are needed.
I think it is not good idea to edit MANIFESTs directly if their
changes are not com
(LDPRELIB) $(GLXLIB)
>>
>> #if GlxUseBuiltInDRIDriver
>> #define ExtraSharedGLReqs /**/
No, Please do not drop SharedGLUReqs change even if
Debian will not ship libGLU from xfree86 source.
This is not Debian specific item, this patch will fix
Linux generic problem. It should be merged to upstream.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
LIB) $(GLXLIB)
>>
>> #if GlxUseBuiltInDRIDriver
>> #define ExtraSharedGLReqs /**/
No, Please do not drop SharedGLUReqs change even if
Debian will not ship libGLU from xfree86 source.
This is not Debian specific item, this patch will fix
Linux generic problem. It should be merg
savage_driver.c
In file included from savage_driver.c:26:
savage_driver.h:19:17: vbe.h: No such file or directory
(snip)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 08:44:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > Bug #187365, #187374 are not only happned on Debian GNU/Linux,
>> > I believe
LDPRELIB) $(ICELIB)
+#define SharedXpmReqs$(LDPRELIB) $(XONLYLIB)
+#define SharedXpReqs $(LDPRELIB) $(EXTENSIONLIB) $(XONLYLIB)
+#define SharedXmuuReqs $(LDPRELIB) $(XONLYLIB)
+#define SharedXrandrReqs $(LDPRELIB) $(XRENDERLIB) $(EXTENSIONLIB) $(XONLYLIB)
+#define SharedGLUReqs$(LDPRELIB) $(GLXLIB)
#if GlxUseBuiltInDRIDriver
#define ExtraSharedGLReqs /**/
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
savage_driver.c
In file included from savage_driver.c:26:
savage_driver.h:19:17: vbe.h: No such file or directory
(snip)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 08:44:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > Bug #187365, #187374 are not only happned on Debian GNU/Linux,
>> > I believe
ICELIB)
+#define SharedXpmReqs$(LDPRELIB) $(XONLYLIB)
+#define SharedXpReqs $(LDPRELIB) $(EXTENSIONLIB) $(XONLYLIB)
+#define SharedXmuuReqs $(LDPRELIB) $(XONLYLIB)
+#define SharedXrandrReqs $(LDPRELIB) $(XRENDERLIB) $(EXTENSIONLIB) $(XONLYLIB)
+#define SharedGLUReqs$(LDPRELIB) $(GLXLIB)
#if GlxU
../../config/cf/Library.tmpl:40: unterminated #ifndef
>> ../../config/imake/imake: Exit code 1.
>> Stop.
>> make[4]: *** [Xau/Makefile] Error 1
Already fixed (svn 209)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
../../config/cf/Library.tmpl:40: unterminated #ifndef
>> ../../config/imake/imake: Exit code 1.
>> Stop.
>> make[4]: *** [Xau/Makefile] Error 1
Already fixed (svn 209)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>>>Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> I'v
-fPIC. I fixed that but unfortunately the lib uses libXau which
>> only comes in a static non-pic flavor. Is there any way to get a pic
>> version of libXau in xlibs-pic for the next version?
OK, I'll update xlibs-pic patch for 4.3.0.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>>>Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> I'v
-fPIC. I fixed that but unfortunately the lib uses libXau which
>> only comes in a static non-pic flavor. Is there any way to get a pic
>> version of libXau in xlibs-pic for the next version?
OK, I'll update xlibs-pic patch for 4.3.0.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
ment,
>> or anything of the sort. If anyone has any comments, please add them.
>> 4.3.0-0pre1:
>> * Get xcursor into sid, check separation is clean (Ishikawa?).
Current status:
xcursor is already installed into sid.
build checks are done on i386/sparc/alpha.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ment,
>> or anything of the sort. If anyone has any comments, please add them.
>> 4.3.0-0pre1:
>> * Get xcursor into sid, check separation is clean (Ishikawa?).
Current status:
xcursor is already installed into sid.
build checks are done on i386/sparc/alpha.
--
ISHIKAWA M
e out. I strongly believed the conclusion had come
out, I do not know why I'm confuse about it, sorry.
[1]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2003/debian-x-200305/msg00201.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2003/debian-x-200305/msg00203.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2003/debian-x-200305/msg00210.html
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
e out. I strongly believed the conclusion had come
out, I do not know why I'm confuse about it, sorry.
[1]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2003/debian-x-200305/msg00201.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2003/debian-x-200305/msg00203.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2003/debian-
I'm currently building the current (svn rev 195)
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian on m68k. So perhaps (if it is not failed)
I can provide MANIFEST.m68k.
My hppa station stop to work since last monday...I can not enough time
to repair it. I'll repair it as soon as possible sorry...
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
because most
of them are already well defined and well separated in the Debian
section of linux.cf, gnu.cf, netbsd.cf by Branden, Daniel, me and
others :-)
Layer 2) glibc related common things can separate into 1 common file
(glibc-common.cf), but currently it is not easy for me because it
I'm currently building the current (svn rev 195)
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian on m68k. So perhaps (if it is not failed)
I can provide MANIFEST.m68k.
My hppa station stop to work since last monday...I can not enough time
to repair it. I'll repair it as soon as possible sorry...
--
ISHIKAWA
ost
of them are already well defined and well separated in the Debian
section of linux.cf, gnu.cf, netbsd.cf by Branden, Daniel, me and
others :-)
Layer 2) glibc related common things can separate into 1 common file
(glibc-common.cf), but currently it is not easy for me because it is
not well defined
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:27:31AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >>>>&
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:27:31AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >>>>&
>> Thanks, Ishikawa-san. I'll fix this up tonight, if you haven't already.
Good morning, Daniel.
I'm planning a hack `OS core independent entries into Debian common
.cf' on this weekend (just posted on this ML). So, please wait it will
be done :-)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
header comments in patch #820)
I just wrote same idea into my TODO list
(xfree86/people/ishikaawa/TODO).
I'm planning to work for this hack on this weekend :-)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Thanks, Ishikawa-san. I'll fix this up tonight, if you haven't already.
Good morning, Daniel.
I'm planning a hack `OS core independent entries into Debian common
.cf' on this weekend (just posted on this ML). So, please wait it will
be done :-)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
header comments in patch #820)
I just wrote same idea into my TODO list
(xfree86/people/ishikaawa/TODO).
I'm planning to work for this hack on this weekend :-)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
ian xfree86 build hack */
#define RenderLibraryDir $(TOP)/../../debian/local/exports
#define XftLibraryDir $(TOP)/../../debian/local/exports
#define XcursorLibraryDir $(TOP)/../../debian/local/exports
# endif
-
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ree86 build hack */
#define RenderLibraryDir $(TOP)/../../debian/local/exports
#define XftLibraryDir $(TOP)/../../debian/local/exports
#define XcursorLibraryDir $(TOP)/../../debian/local/exports
# endif
-
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:22:00PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> Okay, just to make sure I understand the situation:
>>
>> 1) we want to be
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:22:00PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> Okay, just to make sure I understand the situation:
>>
>> 1) we want to be
FreeType2).
FreeType2 code included in xfree86 source tree and libfreetype6's
one are not same (diffrent version and too difficult to sync..),
so if debug X server linked with external FreeType2 and normal
loader server does not, we can not debug X server internal
FreeType2 related thigs.
Yes, 1) problem is gone. But 2) problem is remaing.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
FreeType2 code included in xfree86 source tree and libfreetype6's
one are not same (diffrent version and too difficult to sync..),
so if debug X server linked with external FreeType2 and normal
loader server does not, we can not debug X server internal
FreeType2 related thigs.
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:30PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > > I
:)
>>
>> I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge
>> the change over to branches/4.3.0/sid once I have fixed it on the trunk?
Yes, I can.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:30PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > > I
:)
>>
>> I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge
>> the change over to branches/4.3.0/sid once I have fixed it on the trunk?
Yes, I can.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ould
>> Branden be credited? How much contribution gets a credit? That sort of
>> thing. :)
Ah, I agree this point of view. OK, I'll write only these thning
to debian/changelog, more details will be written to commitlog.
Thanks :-)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ould
>> Branden be credited? How much contribution gets a credit? That sort of
>> thing. :)
Ah, I agree this point of view. OK, I'll write only these thning
to debian/changelog, more details will be written to commitlog.
Thanks :-)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 171)
>> > +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-10 11:44:45 UTC (rev
>> > 172)
>> > @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@
>> > keyboard away from me.
>> >
>> >* #057_X11.tmpl_warning_fix.diff: Imake warning fix patch [ISHIKAWA
;-)
(A memo about this is updated, please refer
people/ishikawa/memo.freetype)
1) This compatibility problem is introduced by freetype2_2.1.4-3.
and revert it after 2.1.4-4. Please upgrade freetype2 to 2.1.4-4
2) I just commited #003 patch update to subversion branches/4.3.0/sid
With this change, FontLibSharedFreeType will be always disable.
Please update #003 patch.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-10 11:44:45 UTC (rev 172)
>> > @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@
>> > keyboard away from me.
>> >
>> >* #057_X11.tmpl_warning_fix.diff: Imake warning fix patch [ISHIKAWA Mutsumi]
>> > -
>>
ated, please refer
people/ishikawa/memo.freetype)
1) This compatibility problem is introduced by freetype2_2.1.4-3.
and revert it after 2.1.4-4. Please upgrade freetype2 to 2.1.4-4
2) I just commited #003 patch update to subversion branches/4.3.0/sid
With this change, FontLibSharedFreeType will be always disable.
Please update #003 patch.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02:56:06.0 +0900
@@ -3145,7 +3145,7 @@
$(RM) index.raw file.nPS file.PS file.txt
#endif
-#ifndef MakeSimpleDoc(file,srcs)
+#ifndef MakeSimpleDoc
#define MakeSimpleDoc(file,srcs) MakeDepSimpleDoc(file,srcs,srcs)
#endif
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[E
02:56:06.0 +0900
@@ -3145,7 +3145,7 @@
$(RM) index.raw file.nPS file.PS file.txt
#endif
-#ifndef MakeSimpleDoc(file,srcs)
+#ifndef MakeSimpleDoc
#define MakeSimpleDoc(file,srcs) MakeDepSimpleDoc(file,srcs,srcs)
#endif
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[E
g about changes between libfreetype6_2.1.4-2 and -3.
I am sorry to make it get confused.
I've not checked libfreetype6_2.1.4-4 yet.
>> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 07:36:13PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 11:20:01PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >> I got a report in private mail (grrr) from a person who ran into the
>&
g about changes between libfreetype6_2.1.4-2 and -3.
I am sorry to make it get confused.
I've not checked libfreetype6_2.1.4-4 yet.
>> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 07:36:13PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 11:20:01PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >> I got a report in private mail (grrr) from a person who ran into the
>&
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 07:24:25PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> >
>> > I've just added a memo under people/ishikawa/ about Fre
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 07:24:25PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> >
>> > I've just added a memo under people/ishikawa/ about Fre
ild problem with FreeType2 should resolve to next XFree86
upstream release. Because current XFree86 upstream CVS tree already
import FreeType 2.1.4 :-)
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri Jun 6 15:40:25 JST 2003
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 01:30:46PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > Why does xutils depends cpp-3.2 instead of cpp ?
>>
1 - 100 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
