Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> A long time agoo, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding the
> pointer hotspot being desynced with viewport on a MGA G400 board. Did
> you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will
> close this bug in the next weeks.
Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Gregory,
>
> About 3 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding some
> fonts not showing up.
> Did you reproduce this problem recently? If not, I will close this bug
> in the next weeks.
I tracked the problem down to some invalid font
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The X server has changed radically in recent years.
>
> Is this bug still present in the X server in a current version of Debian
> (sarge, etch, or sid)? Please reply to the bug trail. (If you don't reply,
> we will eventually assume that the bug i
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 17:11 -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> > Given that the 7.0 ATI drivers are so completely borked and lots of people
> > have reported compiling the driver from the CVS source, surely some people
> > have buil
Given that the 7.0 ATI drivers are so completely borked and lots of people
have reported compiling the driver from the CVS source, surely some people
have built actual debian packages of the ATI driver from CVS source? Is such a
beast available somewhere?
Alternatively, what exactly is the proced
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron M. Ucko) writes:
> You'll run into DRI version skew, and consequently be stuck with
> software rendering, unless you downgrade (and hold back)
> xlib(os)mesa-* in addition to xserver-xorg(-dbg). Apart from that, I
> haven't encountered any problems with mixing and matchin
David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 05:21:50PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> > All I've been doing is "debian/rules build-arch-only":
>
> This target skips the critical patching step. I haven't tested most of the
> target
David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 12:25:00AM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> >
> > This is my first time trying to build local X packages. I seem to be running
> > into various build errors. The current one that's stumping me
This is my first time trying to build local X packages. I seem to be running
into various build errors. The current one that's stumping me seems to be a
missing Imake definition? Is there something obvious I'm missing here?
cd ./config/imake && /usr/bin/make -f Makefile.proto imakeonly
make[3]:
I've pretty much come to the conclusion that I have to downgrade my system to
6.8.2 to overcome a few problems (primarily x.org buzilla id 5443). But now I
can't find xserver-xorg 6.8.2 anywhere.
I seem to recall a server that contained old Debian packages. Or failing that
does anyone have xserve
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 00:46, Gregory Stark wrote:
> > When last we looked at this we were stuck until I could get an unstripped
> > mga_dri.so and I have a hankering to be playing Quake so I wouldn't mind if
> > I
> > could get this going again.
>
> Ha
I think I will post my problems to debian-user or someplace else shortly.
Maybe I'll put it in konqueror's bugzilla since obviously whatever the problem
the net result is that konqueror is failing to display the page. (And
reporting mozilla bugs is futile.)
Incidentally, a number of programs, mos
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Uh, that reasoning leaves a lot to be desired. There's whole pile of
> things Mozilla and Konqueror have in common before they get down to the
> wire protocol. They both use Xft for client-side font rendering, for
> example.
I certainly recognized
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't understand why you think any of the above are X server problems;
> they all sound like client-side issues to me.
Because a) they affect more than one client, konqueror and mozilla to be
specific. and b) I don't think they started when I upda
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It occurs to me that I may not make unstripped versions of the
> chipset-specific DRI modules available, though. Hmmm.
It appears not.
You don't have one lying around in a build tree somewhere do you?
bash-2.05b# dpkg -L xlibmesa3-gl-dbg
/.
/usr
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 05:14:07PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> > I just updated all my X packages (to 4.2.1-12.1) and now I can't play quake!
>
> [Are you subscribed to this list?]
No, but I checked the archives for any si
I just updated all my X packages (to 4.2.1-12.1) and now I can't play quake!
Actually even glxgears fails, both fail with SIGILL:
Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
[Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 20878)]
0x4042a021 in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dr
I just updated all my X packages (to 4.2.1-12.1) and now I can't play quake!
Actually even glxgears fails, both fail with SIGILL:
Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
[Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 20878)]
0x4042a021 in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dr
g list. I poked around
/usr/share/doc/xserver-xfree86 and the xsf web pages and couldn't find any
mention of a separate mailing list. I imagine it's there and I'm just blind.
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 12:20:01AM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROT
g list. I poked around
/usr/share/doc/xserver-xfree86 and the xsf web pages and couldn't find any
mention of a separate mailing list. I imagine it's there and I'm just blind.
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 12:20:01AM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROT
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The libc6 version of Netscape crashes when you close one of its windows or
> try to quit the program since the X libs were compiled using egcs/gcc 2.95.
Unfortunately that's the least of the problems. For many people it crashes
whenever you start Java,
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > That's right. IIRC, doogie said that actually it was some complex
> > interaction with some code in xlib, and it wasn't technically a bug in
> > netscape.
>
> I did some investigation on this subject and I think I have now foun
22 matches
Mail list logo
