On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:16:58PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xorg-video-vesa
> > Version: 1:1.3.0-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > I am trying to set up a Dell D830 which has an Intel graphics controller and
> &
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 01:32:53AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About 4 yours ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS
> regarding a crash related to screensaver and GL. The issue has been
> discussed until 2004. But now, the only recent followup to this bug
> seems to be
Hi,
if I understood the bug report correctly, all packages using xcursor should
simply be recompiled, and that is why the bug was closed? So why is
libeventdb failing to build on all arches?
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=libeventdb
Please file or reassign whereever this FTBFS belongs to
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 02:26:46PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >
> > Sure; someone just needs to tell me what to grep for in /proc/cpuinfo for
> > the various sub-architectures.
>
> Better use /proc/hardware
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /proc/hardware
> Model: Motorola MVME167
> [..
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:11:19PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >
> > http://www.probo.com/timr/savage40.html
>
> That's the one.
>
> > What are you using in pre1? The reason I'm asking is, that version produces
> > a videomode which is out of sync for my mon, while the previous, offical
> > ver
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 05:54:45PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> There's so many bugfixes that it's easier to pull the entire changeset
> in. If there are no objections (and so far, there haven't been), pre2
> will include SiS and Savage.
In case there are objections, where do you get the source
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:11:19PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >
> > http://www.probo.com/timr/savage40.html
>
> That's the one.
>
> > What are you using in pre1? The reason I'm asking is, that version produces
> > a videomode which is out of sync for my mon, while the previous, offical
> > ver
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 05:54:45PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> There's so many bugfixes that it's easier to pull the entire changeset
> in. If there are no objections (and so far, there haven't been), pre2
> will include SiS and Savage.
In case there are objections, where do you get the source
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:54:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> #ifdef LINUX_INPUT
> if (xf86SetBoolOption(local->options, "USB", (common->wcmOpen ==
> xf86WcmUSBOpen))) {
> local->read_input=xf86WcmReadUSBInput;
> common->wcmOpen=xf86WcmUSBOpen;
> xf86Ms
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:54:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> #ifdef LINUX_INPUT
> if (xf86SetBoolOption(local->options, "USB", (common->wcmOpen ==
> xf86WcmUSBOpen))) {
> local->read_input=xf86WcmReadUSBInput;
> common->wcmOpen=xf86WcmUSBOpen;
> xf86Ms
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac
> > does not.. :/
>
> That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on debian-68k.
But it's true, my Mac does not boot with 2.4.20, and yours proba
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac
> > does not.. :/
>
> That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on debian-68k.
But it's true, my Mac does not boot with 2.4.20, and yours proba
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:13:08PM -0700, Pete Shinners wrote:
> Jouni K Seppänen wrote:
> >Package: xserver-xfree86
> >Version: 4.2.1-6
> >Severity: important
> >File: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/savage_drv.o
> >
> >My computer is a Shuttle XPC SK41G, whose mainboard is the Shuttle
> >FX41. I a
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:13:08PM -0700, Pete Shinners wrote:
> Jouni K Seppänen wrote:
> >Package: xserver-xfree86
> >Version: 4.2.1-6
> >Severity: important
> >File: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/savage_drv.o
> >
> >My computer is a Shuttle XPC SK41G, whose mainboard is the Shuttle
> >FX41. I a
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 08:58:30PM -0400, Martin Stolle wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1
> Severity: important
> Tags: sid
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> When building xserver-xfree86 4.2.1 from source, it fails to mention a
> dependency on g++. (I know I am run
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 02:12:11AM +0400, zmej serow wrote:
> please, help. x wan't start on my amiga a1200/b1240/32mb. it hasn't any
> nifty stuff like mediator pci :-) only default aga chipset, nothing more.
I don't think mediator is supported yet, aga should be, since the kernel has
a framebuff
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 10:24:45PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> What's the real problem? I'm running 2.4.20 (from Linux/m68k CVS) on my Amiga,
> with glibc-2.2.5-3? Or is this version glibc too old to exhibit the problem?
I am trying to build some 2.4.20 packages. The last version I tried
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 10:24:45PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> What's the real problem? I'm running 2.4.20 (from Linux/m68k CVS) on my Amiga,
> with glibc-2.2.5-3? Or is this version glibc too old to exhibit the problem?
I am trying to build some 2.4.20 packages. The last version I tried
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 10:58:46AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:40:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:03:46AM +, Markus Laker wrote:
> > > Package: xserver-xfree86
> > > Version: 4.2.1-5
> > > Severity: important
> > >
> > > X serve
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 10:58:46AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:40:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:03:46AM +, Markus Laker wrote:
> > > Package: xserver-xfree86
> > > Version: 4.2.1-5
> > > Severity: important
> > >
> > > X serve
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:23:51PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 05:54:32PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > I believe that en_GB.ISO8859-15, not [EMAIL PROTECTED], is what you want.
> > The creation of an [EMAIL PROTECTED] locale before the UK commits to joining
> >
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 12:35:51AM +0200, Nicolas Boos wrote:
>
> > > [all] Error 2 make[4]: Leaving directory
> > > `/tmp/buildd/xfree86-4.2.1/build-tree/xc/doc' make[3]: *** [all]
> > > Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory
> > > `/tmp/buildd/xfree86-4.2.1/build-tree/xc' make[2]: *** [World] Error
On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 04:53:18PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> hi folks, just upgraded to XF4.2.0 on my testing system from branden's
> people.debian.org archive (the netherlands mirror actually).
>
> now i can get to start with startx and it works perfectly (and sooo
> fast thanks to the 4.2
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:21:57PM -0400, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > gdm ignores it, too.
> >
> > I went to all this trouble to make session management nice for the
> > various and sundry desktops in Debian, and then all the other display
> > managers force people into the
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 12:00:05AM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:17:13PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >* debian/xserver-xfree86.config:
> > [...]
> > - handle case where mdetect returns no output at all; also, break out
> > of
> >autod
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 06:14:33PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Christian T. Steigies" writes:
> >On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:11:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> Can you run it under gdb and see where i
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:11:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Can you run it under gdb and see where it crashes? It would be
> interesting to see the output of "objdump -r" on libbitmap.a and
> libpcidata.a, too.
Sure, logfiles at:
http://people.debian.org/~cts/x4.1/
Note, this version
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:20:38PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Christian T. Steigies" writes:
> >Do you know if these patches could help makeing the m68k elfloader work?
>
> What's the problem with the m68k elfloader, exa
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 04:04:51PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> So, could someone else please take my patches and build and upload X for
> us? They're at:
>
> > http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/debs/311_arm_compiler_h.diff
> > http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/debs/312_arm_elfloader.diff
> > http://ly
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 02:25:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 04:27:42AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> > I know this has been reported before ([1], [2], [3]), but is there any
> > progress on that issue (I just got my shiny new graphics card...)?
Just use the old xserv
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 02:25:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 04:27:42AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> > I know this has been reported before ([1], [2], [3]), but is there any
> > progress on that issue (I just got my shiny new graphics card...)?
Just use the old xser
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 10:15:43PM -0500, Larry Moore wrote:
> At 17:47 -0500 7/18/01, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 04:25:21PM -0500, Larry Moore wrote:
> >> At 23:02 -0500 7/14/01, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >> >The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 10:15:43PM -0500, Larry Moore wrote:
> At 17:47 -0500 7/18/01, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 04:25:21PM -0500, Larry Moore wrote:
> >> At 23:02 -0500 7/14/01, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >> >The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:52:12PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 11:02:47PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
> > Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).
> Doesn't
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:52:12PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 11:02:47PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
> > Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).
> Doesn't
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 11:02:47PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
> Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).
Doesn't build on m68k due to a stupid... idunno, is it a bug? Or just
unlucky coincidence?
gcc -c -O2 -ansi -pedant
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 11:02:47PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
> Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).
Doesn't build on m68k due to a stupid... idunno, is it a bug? Or just
unlucky coincidence?
gcc -c -O2 -ansi -pedan
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 03:48:58PM +0100, Mantas Kriauciunas wrote:
> Again hi again :)
>
> I send to you second message about incorrect locale.alias, but got
> strange answer:
You failed to read between the lines. Imagine you are the maintainer of a
package which 10 million people are using. Ima
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 03:48:58PM +0100, Mantas Kriauciunas wrote:
> Again hi again :)
>
> I send to you second message about incorrect locale.alias, but got
> strange answer:
You failed to read between the lines. Imagine you are the maintainer of a
package which 10 million people are using. Im
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 12:36:22AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> cp debian/MANIFEST.m68k.new debian/MANIFEST.m68k
> fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch
Thanks!
> > So for the
> > build has run fine, didn't need any patches. Do we have hope that
> > somebody fixed the module loader for m68k?
>
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 12:36:22AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> cp debian/MANIFEST.m68k.new debian/MANIFEST.m68k
> fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch
Thanks!
> > So for the
> > build has run fine, didn't need any patches. Do we have hope that
> > somebody fixed the module loader for m68k?
Hi,
[...]
MANIFEST check failed; please see debian/README
make: *** [debian/stampdir/install] Error 1
**
Build finished at 20010620-2309
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
Hi,
[...]
MANIFEST check failed; please see debian/README
make: *** [debian/stampdir/install] Error 1
**
Build finished at 20010620-2309
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
-
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 12:02:06PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 11:22:14AM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:22:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Here's the first cut of 4.1.0.
> > Is there a way to a
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:22:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Here's the first cut of 4.1.0.
Is there a way to avoid downloading the complete source again? I have 4.0.3,
maybe I can rsync of patch or whatever? I have space and fast access at
work, but only slow access at home (and no more sne
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 12:02:06PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 11:22:14AM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:22:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Here's the first cut of 4.1.0.
> > Is there a
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:22:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Here's the first cut of 4.1.0.
Is there a way to avoid downloading the complete source again? I have 4.0.3,
maybe I can rsync of patch or whatever? I have space and fast access at
work, but only slow access at home (and no more sn
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 05:57:34PM -0600, Jeff Lessem wrote:
> In your message of: 05 May 2001 18:08:15 EDT, you write:
> >I'm having trouble getting dpms working on a Dell Inspiron 4000 with
> >an ATI Rage 128 Mobility LF using Adrian Bunk's xserver-xfree86
>
> The r128 driver supports true DPMS.
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 05:57:34PM -0600, Jeff Lessem wrote:
> In your message of: 05 May 2001 18:08:15 EDT, you write:
> >I'm having trouble getting dpms working on a Dell Inspiron 4000 with
> >an ATI Rage 128 Mobility LF using Adrian Bunk's xserver-xfree86
>
> The r128 driver supports true DPMS
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 11:31:19PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> "Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
>
> > I installed X4.0 on a Sony Vaio, it seems to have an ATI Rage128 Pro card
>
> There is no such mobility chip. What does 'lspci|grep VGA' say?
01:00.0 VGA c
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 11:31:19PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> "Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
>
> > I installed X4.0 on a Sony Vaio, it seems to have an ATI Rage128 Pro card
>
> There is no such mobility chip. What does 'lspci|grep VGA' say?
01:00.0 VGA c
Hi,
I installed X4.0 on a Sony Vaio, it seems to have an ATI Rage128 Pro card
which is not yet supported by the ati driver (and the rage128 fails
miserably to install..). Using the VESA driver works fine, however creating
the config file dows not work automatically.
I am running a 2.2.19 kernel and
Hi,
I installed X4.0 on a Sony Vaio, it seems to have an ATI Rage128 Pro card
which is not yet supported by the ati driver (and the rage128 fails
miserably to install..). Using the VESA driver works fine, however creating
the config file dows not work automatically.
I am running a 2.2.19 kernel an
Hi,
this patch fixes the:
(II) Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is
unresolved!
problem on m68k. Please include it in the next version.
Back to status pre ante X11 4.0 now crashes again while loading libpcidata.
Christian
--- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loade
Hi,
this patch fixes the:
(II) Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is unresolved!
problem on m68k. Please include it in the next version.
Back to status pre ante X11 4.0 now crashes again while loading libpcidata.
Christian
--- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loa
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:56:59AM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Sorry, I should have been clearer. There are regular howtos on how to
> build the 4.0.2 packages, both on potato and on unstable, but I haven't
Are these howtos still needed? I built 4.0.2-4 at home without build
trouble (dpkg-build
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:56:59AM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Sorry, I should have been clearer. There are regular howtos on how to
> build the 4.0.2 packages, both on potato and on unstable, but I haven't
Are these howtos still needed? I built 4.0.2-4 at home without build
trouble (dpkg-buil
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 03:50:48PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> "Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 11:38:45PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >
> > > Can you build a static server (#define DoLoadableServer NO in host.def)
> &g
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 03:50:48PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> "Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 11:38:45PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >
> > > Can you build a static server (#define DoLoadableServer NO in host.def)
&g
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 11:38:45PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> Can you build a static server (#define DoLoadableServer NO in host.def) and
> run it in gdb?
This does not seem to do the trick? Linux-m68k/host.def now looks like this:
#define InstallEmptyHostDef
#define DoLoadableServer NO
#define
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:21:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:11:00AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On my i386 box I run two X servers, one on vt9 (24-bit) and one on vt10
> > (16-bit). From time to time I press the wr
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 11:38:45PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> Can you build a static server (#define DoLoadableServer NO in host.def) and
> run it in gdb?
This does not seem to do the trick? Linux-m68k/host.def now looks like this:
#define InstallEmptyHostDef
#define DoLoadableServer NO
#defin
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:21:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:11:00AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On my i386 box I run two X servers, one on vt9 (24-bit) and one on vt10
> > (16-bit). From time to time I press the wr
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 05:05:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Do you have xserver-xfree86 installed?
Of course not, that was the idea of this exercise, since the new xserver
does not work yet on m68k.
> This should only be temporarily necessary, until the 4.x server is working
> on m68k.
Yu
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 05:05:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Do you have xserver-xfree86 installed?
Of course not, that was the idea of this exercise, since the new xserver
does not work yet on m68k.
> This should only be temporarily necessary, until the 4.x server is working
> on m68k.
Y
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 01:01:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Actually, hmm. Did you also manage to get xutils to build? The X4 versions
> of the fonts seem to depend on that package.
Yes, I have and it works with the fonts, when I also install xserver-common...
But startx does not work anymore
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 01:20:53PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
>
> > No idea which libraries do not want to load, ldd shows no problems.
>
> did you try 'ldd -r' ?
No, but there is no difference. However that helped finding the problem.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>grep head /usr/sbin/xserver-configur
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 01:01:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Actually, hmm. Did you also manage to get xutils to build? The X4 versions
> of the fonts seem to depend on that package.
Yes, I have and it works with the fonts, when I also install xserver-common...
But startx does not work anymor
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 01:20:53PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
>
> > No idea which libraries do not want to load, ldd shows no problems.
>
> did you try 'ldd -r' ?
No, but there is no difference. However that helped finding the problem.
root@aahz:~>grep head /usr/sbin/xserver-configure
se
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:14:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Let me guess, your debconf priority is set to CRITICAL, because you don't
> want to be informed about things that might affect the above.
No I haven't. I did read that the preferred font size has changed, but I do
not remember tha
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 07:57:34PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> >> (Actually, I'd like to see next week's XTerm in Debian. There are
> >> some pretty sweet patches pending.)
>
> CTS> I have a problem with uploading _next_ weeks xterm _now ;-)
>
> Please file a bug against the packaging sy
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:20:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> At a guess, it's probably worthwhile uploading just the X client side of
> X4 for m68k, which should at least mean that if X4 is added to testing
> (woody), the only thing that'll be broken is the X server, rather than
> a thousand o
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:14:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Let me guess, your debconf priority is set to CRITICAL, because you don't
> want to be informed about things that might affect the above.
No I haven't. I did read that the preferred font size has changed, but I do
not remember th
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 07:57:34PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> >> (Actually, I'd like to see next week's XTerm in Debian. There are
> >> some pretty sweet patches pending.)
>
> CTS> I have a problem with uploading _next_ weeks xterm _now ;-)
>
> Please file a bug against the packaging s
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:20:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> At a guess, it's probably worthwhile uploading just the X client side of
> X4 for m68k, which should at least mean that if X4 is added to testing
> (woody), the only thing that'll be broken is the X server, rather than
> a thousand
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 06:36:54PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Some of us are particularly keen on getting the 4.0.2 client libraries
> (particularly Xlib and Xaw) as well as the most recent version of
> XTerm into a Debian release as soon as possible. There has also been
> a lot of improv
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 02:46:44AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> Well, the X client libraries and the X server are separate. I'm by no
> means an X expert, but at worst I'd imagine it'd be possible to just
> maintain the old m68k xserver-fbdev package as part of xfree86v3.
Well, currently its no
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:20:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> For reference: m68k is the only released architecture that doesn't have
> X4 uploaded yet.
I know that.
> At a guess, it's probably worthwhile uploading just the X client side of
> X4 for m68k, which should at least mean that if X4
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 06:36:54PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Some of us are particularly keen on getting the 4.0.2 client libraries
> (particularly Xlib and Xaw) as well as the most recent version of
> XTerm into a Debian release as soon as possible. There has also been
> a lot of impro
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 02:46:44AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> Well, the X client libraries and the X server are separate. I'm by no
> means an X expert, but at worst I'd imagine it'd be possible to just
> maintain the old m68k xserver-fbdev package as part of xfree86v3.
Well, currently its n
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:20:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> For reference: m68k is the only released architecture that doesn't have
> X4 uploaded yet.
I know that.
> At a guess, it's probably worthwhile uploading just the X client side of
> X4 for m68k, which should at least mean that if X
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 02:06:23PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> "Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
> > Hmm, does PPC load libpcidata? Is there any special handling?
>
> I don't remember, but I can ask someone on the APUS user list to send you a
> log if you want.
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 02:06:23PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> "Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
> > Hmm, does PPC load libpcidata? Is there any special handling?
>
> I don't remember, but I can ask someone on the APUS user list to send you a
> log if you want.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 11:38:45PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> As I pointed out earlier, PPC works without any PCI support.
Hmm, does PPC load libpcidata? Is there any special handling?
> > Note that I had to change an Imakefile to build stuff in bus/pci, because
> > otherwise a makefile wou
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 11:38:45PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> As I pointed out earlier, PPC works without any PCI support.
Hmm, does PPC load libpcidata? Is there any special handling?
> > Note that I had to change an Imakefile to build stuff in bus/pci, because
> > otherwise a makefile wo
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:05:58PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Thanks for all the hints, I will rebuild with the new gcc and libc6.
Same results with gcc-2.95.3 and libc6-2.2, so the memcpy patch (and/or not
stripping of libraries) is needed to build x4.0 on m68k with current
packa
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:05:58PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Thanks for all the hints, I will rebuild with the new gcc and libc6.
Same results with gcc-2.95.3 and libc6-2.2, so the memcpy patch (and/or not
stripping of libraries) is needed to build x4.0 on m68k with current
packa
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 06:06:43PM -0800, Tor Slettnes wrote:
>
> > "Michel" == Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michel> There is a SYMFUNC for memcpy which is guarded by
>
> Michel> #if (defined(__powerpc__) && (defined(Lynx) || defined(linux)))
> || defined(__sparc__)
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 06:06:43PM -0800, Tor Slettnes wrote:
>
> > "Michel" == Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michel> There is a SYMFUNC for memcpy which is guarded by
>
> Michel> #if (defined(__powerpc__) && (defined(Lynx) || defined(linux))) ||
>defined(__sparc__)
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:01:00PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> With 4.0.2 installed:
>
> ~> strings /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a|grep memcpy
> xf86memcpy
>
>
> memcpy is #defined to xf86memcpy in
> xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/xf86_libc.h
>
> So something goes very w
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:01:00PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> With 4.0.2 installed:
>
> ~> strings /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a|grep memcpy
> xf86memcpy
>
>
> memcpy is #defined to xf86memcpy in
> xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/xf86_libc.h
>
> So something goes very
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:48:42PM -0500, Zephaniah E Hull wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:11:00AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On my i386 box I run two X servers, one on vt9 (24-bit) and one on vt10
> > (16-bit). From time to time I press the wr
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:48:42PM -0500, Zephaniah E Hull wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:11:00AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On my i386 box I run two X servers, one on vt9 (24-bit) and one on vt10
> > (16-bit). From time to time I press the wr
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:28:03PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Could you try not stripping the modules? I recall alpha having a
> similar problem.
Got a quick patch for that? I found it not very easy to patch X here and
there for testing (yes, I always build it from scratch) without adding
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:28:03PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Could you try not stripping the modules? I recall alpha having a
> similar problem.
Got a quick patch for that? I found it not very easy to patch X here and
there for testing (yes, I always build it from scratch) without adding
Hi,
On my i386 box I run two X servers, one on vt9 (24-bit) and one on vt10
(16-bit). From time to time I press the wrong function key when changeing
servers, like ctrl-alt-F11. ctrl-alt-F11 immediately causes the machine to
completely lockup, clocks stop, can't kill the X server, even the MagicSys
Hi,
On my i386 box I run two X servers, one on vt9 (24-bit) and one on vt10
(16-bit). From time to time I press the wrong function key when changeing
servers, like ctrl-alt-F11. ctrl-alt-F11 immediately causes the machine to
completely lockup, clocks stop, can't kill the X server, even the MagicSy
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:48:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Bah.
Oh maybe youre lucky. Hesaid X4.0 is next on his list, for powrpc though.
> Put xserver-fbdev on hold, and upgrade as much of XFree86 as will upgrade.
I reinstalled xserver-fbdev from 3.3.6 (should be functionally equivalen
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:48:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Bah.
Oh maybe youre lucky. Hesaid X4.0 is next on his list, for powrpc though.
> Put xserver-fbdev on hold, and upgrade as much of XFree86 as will upgrade.
I reinstalled xserver-fbdev from 3.3.6 (should be functionally equivale
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 11:24:18AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> Hrm, well, that kinda sucks. Prod him again. Is there anybody who still
> does bus-level hacking on the m68k anymore? Perhaps we can beg Geert?
Till a few minutes ago he was very busy with linux-2.4.0. I think now his
holiday
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
