Mapping testing-security to testing-proposed-updates.
Accepted:
xdmx-tools_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12lenny2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx-tools_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12lenny2_i386.deb
xdmx_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12lenny2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12lenny2_i386.deb
xnest_1.3.0.0.dfsg-1
xorg-server_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12lenny2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
xorg-server_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12lenny2.dsc
xorg-server_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12lenny2.diff.gz
xprint-common_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12lenny2_all.deb
xserver-xorg-core_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12lenny2_i386.deb
xserver-xor
On 11267 March 1977, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> libxfont-dev_1.3.1-2_i386.deb: package says section is libdevel, override
>> says x11.
>> libxfont1-dbg_1.3.1-2_i386.deb: package says section is libdevel, override
>> says x11.
>> libxfont1_1.3.1-2_i386.deb: package says section is libs, override sa
I can confirm that 1:6.7.198~git20080117.6bd510a2-1, from experimental,
correctly detects a connected monitor on the LVDS output, which allows
normal operation of the driver to occur. (The previous version detected
no monitors and thus errored out)
Matthew W. S. Bell
signature.asc
Description: T
ChangeLog|
624 ++
Xext/EVI.c |
15
Xext/cup.c |
3
Xext/sampleEVI.c
Thansk all for the comments.
Since this is good info, I made a wiki page
http://wiki.debian.org/PackageArchitectureAlmostAny
based on the discussion here.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 05:35:10PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>
> > 4) wanna-build state dep-wait
> >
> > One option would be to put gs
Brian DeRocher wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
> Version: 1:6.7.197-1
> Severity: important
>
> This bug report is similar to my previous one (#457563). After upgrading kdm
> starts and freezes the system. After removing kdm from /etc/rc2.d, i tried
> to
> start it up manually. This
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.7.197-1
Severity: important
This bug report is similar to my previous one (#457563). After upgrading kdm
starts and freezes the system. After removing kdm from /etc/rc2.d, i tried to
start it up manually. This also fails. I tried startx and that f
Tag 'xorg-server-2_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12lenny2' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> at 2008-01-19 01:53 +
Tagging upload of xorg-server 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12lenny2 to testing-security.
Changes since xorg-server-2_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12lenny1:
Julien Cristau (4):
Security update, fixes multipl
> Now we have several overlapping mechanisms to avoid building packages
> on selected architectures. Worse, we don't have any proper instructions
> explaining which mechaism to use.
>
> 1) Architecture: list in package source
>
> This is what gsynaptics does now. wanna-build will still off
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi Luk,
>
> I wish things were such simple. Here is the root cause etc.
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 06:58:40PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Osamu Aoki wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Dear porter, please enlighten me.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:26:20PM +, Martin Guy wrote:
>
block 461088 by 461551
thanks
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 09:58:08PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > gsynaptics lists s390 as supported (Architecture: any) but
> > xserver-xorg-input-synaptics is not available. This leads to
> > uninstallable binary packages.
> > Bastian
> With serious tag and him bein
Package: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics
Version: 0.14.7~git20070706-2
Severity: wishlist
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: eabi
Hi,
please add armeb and armel to the architecture list.
--
"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hi Luk,
I wish things were such simple. Here is the root cause etc.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 06:58:40PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Dear porter, please enlighten me.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:26:20PM +, Martin Guy wrote:
> >> Package: gsynaptics
> >
Sven Pilz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> will there be new packages for etch?
>
Sure, xorg-server_1.1.1-21etch3 is being processed right now.
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xorg-server_1.1.1-21etch3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xorg-server_1.1.1-21etch3.dsc
xorg-server_1.1.1-21etch3.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-core_1.1.1-21etch3_i386.deb
xserver-xorg-dev_1.1.1-21etch3_i386.deb
xdmx_1.1.1-21etch3_i386.deb
xdmx-tools_1.1.1-2
Hi,
will there be new packages for etch?
Thanks
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xterm
Version: 231-1
After a dist-upgrade this morning (using Debian-testing/Lenny) I noticed
the semantics of how the cursor is displayed has changed for the worse.
Before: When I was _began_ typing in an xterm, the mouse cursor would
disappear and stay that way until I moved the mo
Hi Julien,
* Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-19 13:07]:
> as xorg-server 1.4 isn't ready to migrate, and won't be for some more
> time, I prepared an updated package for testing-security.
Oh thanks, that's really nice.
> It fixes CVE-2007-5760, CVE-2007-5958, CVE-2007-6427, CVE-2007-6
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> reassign 461489 xkb-data
Bug#461489: sense of laptop 'fn' key reversed on gateway MX6453
Bug reassigned from package `xorg' to `xkb-data'.
> found 461489 0.9-4
Bug#461489: sense of
Package: xkbd-data
Version: 0.9-4
I have a Gateway MX6453 laptop, and I'm having a problem with the
keyboard. I believe that this is an xkbd-data 0.9-4 bug.
I am using debian 'etch' or stable, and my system is 'up to date'
according to the update tool.
There's a 'fn' key in the lower left corne
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 461489 xorg
Bug#461489: sense of laptop 'fn' key reversed on gateway MX6453
Warning: Unknown package 'xkbd-data'
Bug reassigned from package `xkbd-data' to `xorg'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
Hi,
as xorg-server 1.4 isn't ready to migrate, and won't be for some more
time, I prepared an updated package for testing-security.
It fixes CVE-2007-5760, CVE-2007-5958, CVE-2007-6427, CVE-2007-6428,
CVE-2007-6429 and CVE-2008-0006, and will be on its way to klecker in a
few minutes.
I'm travelli
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 08:09:07AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Change "Generic Monitor" into "LVDS", it should work. For more detail,
> see http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/HowToRandR12 sections III.1 and
> III.3
Yes it does work, I should have RTFWiki ;) , now I get 85x86.
So
Package: xkb-data
Version: 1.1~cvs.20080104.1-1
Severity: normal
setxkbmap chokes on the olpc-enhanced Afghanistan map. Apparently they
are using unrecognized symbols.
I first noticed this starting up gnome-settings-daemon. On the console,
it complained about the "tilde" symbol on line 220. I ch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> forwarded 451893 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12865
Bug#451893: xserver-xorg-video-intel: shows no fonts
Bug#451791: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Fonts and many other it
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:35:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #256129: xfree86: xlibs reports "Maximum number of clients
reached"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Lawrence Curington wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-core
> Version: 2:1.1.1-21etch2
>
> If you upgrade to this version of xserver-xorg-core in
> Debian Etch, it causes some icons in icewm window
> manager to display in a corrupted manner. The actual
> pixmaps themselves are not corrupted. They're j
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:35:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing very old wontfix
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:35:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing very old wontfix
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:35:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing very old wontfix
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:35:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing very old wontfix
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:35:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing very old wontfix
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> forcemerge 363965 220469
Bug#363965: xserver-xorg: Can't force update of /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Bug#220469: xserver-xfree86: [debconf] should re-create config files if they
don't exist
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:24:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#257703: xfree86: consider separate targets for xc and
xc-xserver-xfree86-dbg builds
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:26:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#258130: xfree86: make all X clients depend on
x-window-system-core
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:08:15 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#461501: xserver-xorg-core: dpi set to 96 inspite of
DisplaySize option
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
37 matches
Mail list logo
