Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi Luk, > > I wish things were such simple. Here is the root cause etc. > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 06:58:40PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >> Osamu Aoki wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Dear porter, please enlighten me. >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:26:20PM +0000, Martin Guy wrote: >>>> Package: gsynaptics >>>> Version: 0.9.7-3 >>>> Severity: wishlist >>>> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Usertags: eabi >>>> >>>> Please add "armel" to the architecture list in debian/control (or make it >>>> "any") >>>> >>>> (A new ARM port should be going into lenny to replace the old one in >>>> lenny+1; >>>> see wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort) >>> Since S360 build failure caused me to chose explicit arch list, I >>> think I have to add eabi to fix this bug. I wish if we can do >> s/s360/s390/ > > Yes. > >> What build failure do you mean? 0.9.7-1+b1 as well as 0.9.7-1+b2 built >> fine and 0.9.7-2 didn't have s390 listed anymore as a supported >> architecture... > > That is intentional because of Bug #397917. http://bugs.debian.org/397917 > > What I meant by "build failure" was that an uninstallable package was > created, I think.
Ok, though it was still you that chose to go for option 3 which means you have to change the Arch-line every time a new supported arch is known... Changing the synaptics related packages is not going to happen as s390 has no support for it... So you can either still go for option 3 or change to option 4 now by changing it to Arch:any. As the binaries are already removed and it won't be built on s390 anymore anyway, this might be the best thing to do... Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
