On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 03:11:11PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ++# define SharedXcursorRev1.0
>
> I believe this should just be 1:
>
> $ ls -l /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.*
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:37:39AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:20:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 12:13:59AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > Sorry I can't be of much more assistance, I'm no longer a part of the
> > > Debian X Strike Force
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 12:17:33AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Um, you seem to have left out
> + 049_remove_duplicate_XShm_prototype.diff
> Which does indeed need to be forward-ported (although it turns into a
> stolen-from-HEAD patch). (Or maybe it doesn't need to be forward-ported due
>
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 10:15:28PM -0600, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> Package: xterm
> Version: 4.2.1-5jds2
In the future, please don't file bugs with the Debian Bug Tracking
System against packages that the Debian Project does not produce or
distribute.
I have no idea what xterm "4.2.1-5jds2" is. I p
Package: xterm
Version: 4.2.1-5jds2
Severity: wishlist
The default settings for xterm in /usr/lib/menu/xterm have no options
specified by default. The -sb option places a 50 line scroll bar on the
left side of the terminal thus making it far more useful.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 06:27:32PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> +[29 January] XFree86 4.2.1-16 has been accepted into Debian
> unstable. This is a minor,
> +incremental release to resolve an FTBFS (failure-to-build-from-source)
> bug on the SPARC architecture that
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-03 18:44:00 -0500 (Tue, 03 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1004
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
Log:
Update patch status, and add two SMALL items I forgot for 4.3.0-1, courtesy
of Nathanael Nerode.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
===
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:20:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 12:13:59AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Sorry I can't be of much more assistance, I'm no longer a part of the
> > Debian X Strike Force,
>
> You are as long as you continue to participate in the mailing l
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-03 18:37:04 -0500 (Tue, 03 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1003
Modified:
NEWS.xhtml
Log:
Add item describing patch audit completion and where things go from here.
Modified: NEWS.xhtml
===
--- NEWS.xhtml 20
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-03 18:27:31 -0500 (Tue, 03 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1002
Modified:
NEWS.xhtml
Log:
Add item announcing release of 4.2.1-16.
Modified: NEWS.xhtml
===
--- NEWS.xhtml 2004-02-03 23:27:10 UTC (rev 1001)
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-03 18:27:10 -0500 (Tue, 03 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1001
Modified:
NEWS.xhtml
Log:
Add section heading for 2003 news.
Modified: NEWS.xhtml
===
--- NEWS.xhtml 2004-02-01 19:39:32 UTC (rev 1000)
+++ NE
Your message dated Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:10:50 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230243: xbase-clients: startx -- :0 uses too large UI fonts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 03:08:09PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 08:58:25PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 11:37:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > They seem to give some hints. Your trace sh
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 12:13:59AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Sorry I can't be of much more assistance, I'm no longer a part of the
> Debian X Strike Force,
You are as long as you continue to participate in the mailing list. In
fact, you very recently closed a bug against one of the xfree86
pac
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 02:12:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello.
> I have a problem with launching some X applications like :
>
> enkill:# xchat
> xchat: relocation error: /usr/lib/libXft.so.2: undefined symbol:
> XRenderQuerySubpixelOrder
>
> enkill:# evolution
> evolution: relocation
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:51:09PM -0700, Thanasis Kinias wrote:
> I just found the thread on the VT problems with i830. I've a Radeon
> R250 in my laptop and have the same problem. With the generic driver
> and 4.2 from Sarge things were fine. I just get no VT switching with
> the experimental
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:38:16AM +1300, Mike Beattie wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:11:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I have felt consistently under pressure to do 2 things:
> >
> > 1) release xfree86 4.3.0-1 to sid ASAP
> > 2) delegate responsibility ASAP
> >
> > Very few actions
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 06:22:24PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:08:19PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> [...]
> >> I did, however, state that I felt that 4.3.0-1 was by far the superior
> >> base to work from in sid, for a n
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 02:21:31PM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:04:30 -0500
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This upload was done without advance notice to, or consultation with the
> > rest of the X Strike Force (XSF) team
>
> I asked Branden for clarific
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 12:47:12PM -0300, Enzo Alberto Dari wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 12:34, Grzegorz Galazka wrote:
> > On 03 Feb 2004 11:28:33 -0300
> > Enzo Alberto Dari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > - Radeon 9200 SE (chip ID: 5964)
> >
> > It's an AGPx8 device, it won't work prope
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 12:34, Grzegorz Galazka wrote:
> On 03 Feb 2004 11:28:33 -0300
> Enzo Alberto Dari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > - Radeon 9200 SE (chip ID: 5964)
>
> It's an AGPx8 device, it won't work properly on 2.4.x kernels, since
> they dont have AGPv3 support. Try 2.6.x kernel.
> .
On 03 Feb 2004 11:28:33 -0300
Enzo Alberto Dari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Radeon 9200 SE (chip ID: 5964)
It's an AGPx8 device, it won't work properly on 2.4.x kernels, since
they dont have AGPv3 support. Try 2.6.x kernel.
greg
--
Grzegorz Galazka # catch me via Jabber:
RLU #219601 #
Hi all,
I know I'm a bit late in packaging that module but I've been able to
make it work (again) on my hardware only a few weeks ago.
Now comes the problem: linda complains about
E: xfree86-driver-synaptics; Binary
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/input/synaptics_drv.o is not stripped.
The binary shown
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 15:28, Enzo Alberto Dari wrote:
>
> Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
> agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 941M
> agpgart: Detected Via Apollo Pro KT400 chipset
> agpgart: unable to determine aperture size.
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 10:53, Alan Chandler wrote:
> ...
> I am getting the XFree log message saying AGP not available, yet the messages
> in kern.log don't show any problem. I am stuck - where do I look now for
> this problem?
> ...
Just to say that I'm having the same problem, but with:
- Wood
FYI, my PC with the misbehaving s3virge is sitting beside me in pieces,
so I can't easily let you know whether XFree86 4.3 fixes the problem for
good. I'm willing to donate the card to someone who is willing and able
to fix the problem, though.
26 matches
Mail list logo
