Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 19:36:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#169019: (startx fails to start x from console). FIX
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:41:31PM -0800, jeff wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-3
> Severity: normal
>
> When I come back and find the machine locked up the display is usually
> blank but a couple of times it has had nerverot from xscreensaver frozen on
> it. This has been going
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 10:09:17PM -0500, Jerry Quinn wrote:
> Chris Halls writes:
> > I read this in Kernel Traffic #192. Could this be your problem?
>
> > Marcelo Tosatti announced 2.4.20-rc1 and included the BitKeeper summary. He
> > said, "Several networking fixes, net drivers fixes, devfs
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 19:25:54 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#167234: Problems XFree86 + NvidiaGeforce 2 MX400 twinwiev
+ Apple Studio Display 15'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 19:32:52 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168313: xserver switches from digital to analog mode with
ATI Radeon VE QY
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Michel, can you review this patch for correctness, or at least
plausibility?
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:56:35PM +0100, Michael Karcher wrote:
> Package: xlibmesa3
> Version: 4.2.1-2
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> There are some minor bugs that cause the mesa library to access bad memory
> w
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 06:53:35PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> +* ensure packages are at least as functional on the architectures in
> + unstable as the 4.2.1 packages are (so that no arch sees a horrendous
> + regression);
> + + Fix XFree86 X server module loader problems on IA-64
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 165758 libxaw6: SEGV in XawTextSourceScan() triggered by xclips
Bug#165758: Old version 6 of libXaw in sid does not work as in woody, segfaults
programs
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 200478 libxaw6: SEGV in XawTextSourceScan() triggered by xcli
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 17:51:55 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line yet again you have destroyed the function of xkb during an
update
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 17:53:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#165591: debconf shenanigans
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 19:36:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#169019: (startx fails to start x from console). FIX
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 17:39:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#164799: xserver-xfree86: dexconf keeps putting 'sv' for my
XkbLayout instead of 'se'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 17:47:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#165061: x windowx don't start
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
tag 162278 + moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 12:41:07PM +1000, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I have just upgraded to Xfree 86 v4.1.0.1 on a PowerMac 7600/200.
> Xfree86 v3 was working fine.
>
> Now, when I move the mouse or click, garbage characters come up in
> whatever window is open as if I w
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:41:31PM -0800, jeff wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-3
> Severity: normal
>
> When I come back and find the machine locked up the display is usually
> blank but a couple of times it has had nerverot from xscreensaver frozen on
> it. This has been going
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 10:09:17PM -0500, Jerry Quinn wrote:
> Chris Halls writes:
> > I read this in Kernel Traffic #192. Could this be your problem?
>
> > Marcelo Tosatti announced 2.4.20-rc1 and included the BitKeeper summary. He
> > said, "Several networking fixes, net drivers fixes, devfs
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 17:22:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xserver-xfree86: [nv] Symbol fbdevHWGetLineLength from module
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 19:25:54 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#167234: Problems XFree86 + NvidiaGeforce 2 MX400 twinwiev + Apple
Studio Display 15'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 162278 + moreinfo
Bug#162278: xserver-xfree86: [mouse] ADB mouse generates spurious events when
gpm used as repeater
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 19:32:52 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168313: xserver switches from digital to analog mode with ATI
Radeon VE QY
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Michel, can you review this patch for correctness, or at least
plausibility?
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:56:35PM +0100, Michael Karcher wrote:
> Package: xlibmesa3
> Version: 4.2.1-2
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> There are some minor bugs that cause the mesa library to access bad memory
> w
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 01:24:38PM +0200, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> As a first step to get a -g compiled xnest binary, I just tried to build
> X11 myself (apt-get source xnest; debuild -us -uc in the directory, have
> plenty of disk space), but unfortunately, the build process terminates
> with:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 06:53:35PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> +* ensure packages are at least as functional on the architectures in
> + unstable as the 4.2.1 packages are (so that no arch sees a horrendous
> + regression);
> + + Fix XFree86 X server module loader problems on IA-64
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 165758 libxaw6: SEGV in XawTextSourceScan() triggered by xclips
Bug#165758: Old version 6 of libXaw in sid does not work as in woody, segfaults
programs
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 200478 libxaw6: SEGV in XawTextSourceScan() triggered by xcli
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 208804 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#208804: xserver-xfree86: [core server] crash when XAA pixmap cache server
has to deal with heavily-fragmented offscreen memory
Changed Bug submitter from Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 17:51:55 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line yet again you have destroyed the function of xkb during an update
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 17:53:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#165591: debconf shenanigans
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 17:39:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#164799: xserver-xfree86: dexconf keeps putting 'sv' for my
XkbLayout instead of 'se'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 17:47:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#165061: x windowx don't start
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
tag 162278 + moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 12:41:07PM +1000, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I have just upgraded to Xfree 86 v4.1.0.1 on a PowerMac 7600/200.
> Xfree86 v3 was working fine.
>
> Now, when I move the mouse or click, garbage characters come up in
> whatever window is open as if I w
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 17:22:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xserver-xfree86: [nv] Symbol fbdevHWGetLineLength from module
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 162278 + moreinfo
Bug#162278: xserver-xfree86: [mouse] ADB mouse generates spurious events when gpm used
as repeater
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 01:24:38PM +0200, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> As a first step to get a -g compiled xnest binary, I just tried to build
> X11 myself (apt-get source xnest; debuild -us -uc in the directory, have
> plenty of disk space), but unfortunately, the build process terminates
> with:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 208804 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#208804: xserver-xfree86: [core server] crash when XAA pixmap cache server has to
deal with heavily-fragmented offscreen memory
Changed Bug submitter from Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:12:57PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 10:43, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > I am in search of woody powerpc backports of either 4.2.1 or 4.3.0
> > packages. Or a way to have a Radeon 9000 recognized and working with
> > 4.1.0, which is feasible on x86 w
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:12:57PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 10:43, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > I am in search of woody powerpc backports of either 4.2.1 or 4.3.0
> > packages. Or a way to have a Radeon 9000 recognized and working with
> > 4.1.0, which is feasible on x86 w
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 15:43, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> > > This is Xnest's stderr, as is clearly seen by starting enlightenment
> > > from a different tty.
> >
> > Clearly? Then I'm probably blind...
>
> Look:
Hey, I bought it already. ;) I just don't agree it's 'clearly seen' in
the original r
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 15:43, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> > > This is Xnest's stderr, as is clearly seen by starting enlightenment
> > > from a different tty.
> >
> > Clearly? Then I'm probably blind...
>
> Look:
Hey, I bought it already. ;) I just don't agree it's 'clearly seen' in
the original r
> > This is Xnest's stderr, as is clearly seen by starting enlightenment
> > from a different tty.
>
> Clearly? Then I'm probably blind...
Look:
=== xterm #1 ===
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -la /proc/self/fd
total 0
dr-x--2 tf tf 0 Sep 5 17:37 .
dr-xr-xr-x3 tf
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 13:24, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> > > > This looks like an enlightenment rather than an Xnest bug to me?
> > >
> > > I do not share this opinion. An X client (be it a window manager or not)
> > > should not be able to crash an X server.
> >
> > Absolutely, but your report did
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 06:45:00 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xlibs needs to be recompiled with libfreetype6 >= 2.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
> > This is Xnest's stderr, as is clearly seen by starting enlightenment
> > from a different tty.
>
> Clearly? Then I'm probably blind...
Look:
=== xterm #1 ===
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -la /proc/self/fd
total 0
dr-x--2 tf tf 0 Sep 5 17:37 .
dr-xr-xr-x3 tf
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 06:31:50 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xlibs: symlink loop created in /etc/X11/app-defaults by
postinst
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
> > > This looks like an enlightenment rather than an Xnest bug to me?
> >
> > I do not share this opinion. An X client (be it a window manager or not)
> > should not be able to crash an X server.
>
> Absolutely, but your report didn't definitely show an Xnest crash. Is
> the X error from Xnest or
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 12:54, Miles Bader wrote:
> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Grrr, I really wish I could just slap a debugger on the kernel and
> > > see _why_ the allocation is failing... hmmm, maybe I can stick some
> > > printks in at least. ACtually that's not a bad idea..
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Grrr, I really wish I could just slap a debugger on the kernel and
> > see _why_ the allocation is failing... hmmm, maybe I can stick some
> > printks in at least. ACtually that's not a bad idea...
>
> Again, it's likely because you're reserving all A
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 13:24, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> > > > This looks like an enlightenment rather than an Xnest bug to me?
> > >
> > > I do not share this opinion. An X client (be it a window manager or not)
> > > should not be able to crash an X server.
> >
> > Absolutely, but your report did
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 00:31, Miles Bader wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 07:06:29PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > >(WW) I810(0): xf86AllocateGARTMemory: allocation of 1024 pages failed
> > >(Cannot allocate memory)
> > >(II) I810(0): No physical memory available for 4194304 b
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 10:43, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> I am in search of woody powerpc backports of either 4.2.1 or 4.3.0
> packages. Or a way to have a Radeon 9000 recognized and working with
> 4.1.0, which is feasible on x86 with ati's proprietary closed sources
> drivers, but saddly not for powerp
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 06:45:00 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xlibs needs to be recompiled with libfreetype6 >= 2.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 06:31:50 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xlibs: symlink loop created in /etc/X11/app-defaults by postinst
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 09:37, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > This looks like an enlightenment rather than an Xnest bug to me?
>
> I do not share this opinion. An X client (be it a window manager or not)
> should not be able to crash an X server.
Absolu
> > > This looks like an enlightenment rather than an Xnest bug to me?
> >
> > I do not share this opinion. An X client (be it a window manager or not)
> > should not be able to crash an X server.
>
> Absolutely, but your report didn't definitely show an Xnest crash. Is
> the X error from Xnest or
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 12:54, Miles Bader wrote:
> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Grrr, I really wish I could just slap a debugger on the kernel and
> > > see _why_ the allocation is failing... hmmm, maybe I can stick some
> > > printks in at least. ACtually that's not a bad idea..
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Grrr, I really wish I could just slap a debugger on the kernel and
> > see _why_ the allocation is failing... hmmm, maybe I can stick some
> > printks in at least. ACtually that's not a bad idea...
>
> Again, it's likely because you're reserving all A
Hello,
I am in search of woody powerpc backports of either 4.2.1 or 4.3.0
packages. Or a way to have a Radeon 9000 recognized and working with
4.1.0, which is feasible on x86 with ati's proprietary closed sources
drivers, but saddly not for powerpc.
Does someone know if such packages are already
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-11
Severity: important
Tags: upstream, patch
Note to self: after this gets a bug number, set the submitter to Mr.
Winischhofer.
- Forwarded message from Thomas Winischhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Thomas Winischhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: deb
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:59:57AM +, Brian Stults wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 04:44:53PM -0500, Brian Stults wrote:
> >>(WW) xf86ReadBIOS: Failed to open /dev/mem (Operation not permitted)
> >>
> >>Fatal server error:
> >>xf86OpenConsole: Server must be suid root
>
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 11:17:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Well, all the existing .po files wrap at 79 columns except for de.po,
> which wraps at 80.
...which was my fault, and which has since been fixed. :)
--
G. Branden Robinson|I had thought very carefully about
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 00:31, Miles Bader wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 07:06:29PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > >(WW) I810(0): xf86AllocateGARTMemory: allocation of 1024 pages failed
> > >(Cannot allocate memory)
> > >(II) I810(0): No physical memory available for 4194304 b
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:17:25PM +0200, Malte Cornils wrote:
> when choosing a window manager like twm with kdm or wdm (maybe also others,
> but not xdm), this window manager is executed without taking into account the
> user .xsession.
>
> The user .xsession is only taken into account when u
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 10:43, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> I am in search of woody powerpc backports of either 4.2.1 or 4.3.0
> packages. Or a way to have a Radeon 9000 recognized and working with
> 4.1.0, which is feasible on x86 with ati's proprietary closed sources
> drivers, but saddly not for powerp
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:25:23PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 04:40:56AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 10:01:17PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > There is an evdev driver in 4.3.0-0pre1v1, which has just hit experimental
> > > today, and that
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 09:37, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > This looks like an enlightenment rather than an Xnest bug to me?
>
> I do not share this opinion. An X client (be it a window manager or not)
> should not be able to crash an X server.
Absolu
Hello,
I am in search of woody powerpc backports of either 4.2.1 or 4.3.0
packages. Or a way to have a Radeon 9000 recognized and working with
4.1.0, which is feasible on x86 with ati's proprietary closed sources
drivers, but saddly not for powerpc.
Does someone know if such packages are already
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-11
Severity: important
Tags: upstream, patch
Note to self: after this gets a bug number, set the submitter to Mr.
Winischhofer.
- Forwarded message from Thomas Winischhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Thomas Winischhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EM
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:59:57AM +, Brian Stults wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 04:44:53PM -0500, Brian Stults wrote:
> >>(WW) xf86ReadBIOS: Failed to open /dev/mem (Operation not permitted)
> >>
> >>Fatal server error:
> >>xf86OpenConsole: Server must be suid root
>
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 11:17:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Well, all the existing .po files wrap at 79 columns except for de.po,
> which wraps at 80.
...which was my fault, and which has since been fixed. :)
--
G. Branden Robinson|I had thought very carefully about
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:17:25PM +0200, Malte Cornils wrote:
> when choosing a window manager like twm with kdm or wdm (maybe also others,
> but not xdm), this window manager is executed without taking into account the
> user .xsession.
>
> The user .xsession is only taken into account when u
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:25:23PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 04:40:56AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 10:01:17PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > There is an evdev driver in 4.3.0-0pre1v1, which has just hit experimental
> > > today, and that
70 matches
Mail list logo
