> > This is Xnest's stderr, as is clearly seen by starting enlightenment > > from a different tty. > > Clearly? Then I'm probably blind...
Look: === xterm #1 === [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -la /proc/self/fd total 0 dr-x------ 2 tf tf 0 Sep 5 17:37 . dr-xr-xr-x 3 tf tf 0 Sep 5 17:37 .. lrwx------ 1 tf tf 64 Sep 5 17:37 0 -> /dev/pts/2 lrwx------ 1 tf tf 64 Sep 5 17:37 1 -> /dev/pts/2 lrwx------ 1 tf tf 64 Sep 5 17:37 2 -> /dev/pts/2 lr-x------ 1 tf tf 64 Sep 5 17:37 3 -> /proc/4056/fd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Xnest :1 & [1] 10833 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/, removing from list! X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) Major opcode of failed request: 73 (X_GetImage) Serial number of failed request: 88180 Current serial number in output stream: 88180 === xterm #2 === [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -la /proc/self/fd total 0 dr-x------ 2 tf tf 0 Sep 5 17:38 . dr-xr-xr-x 3 tf tf 0 Sep 5 17:38 .. lrwx------ 1 tf tf 64 Sep 5 17:38 0 -> /dev/pts/5 lrwx------ 1 tf tf 64 Sep 5 17:38 1 -> /dev/pts/5 lrwx------ 1 tf tf 64 Sep 5 17:38 2 -> /dev/pts/5 lr-x------ 1 tf tf 64 Sep 5 17:38 3 -> /proc/23241/fd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ DISPLAY=:1.0 enlightenment Xlib: extension "MIT-SHM" missing on display ":1.0". Xlib: extension "MIT-SHM" missing on display ":1.0". Xlib: extension "MIT-SHM" missing on display ":1.0". (...)
