Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: important
Hi Branden,
I see that reportbug includes my XF86Config-4 and /var/log/XFree86.0.log by
default, saving me the trouble. Impressive. Anyway, this config file used to
work with 4.1, but not with 4.2. I only discovered this today. I'm tra
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:29:18PM -0600, Tim Pope wrote:
> I'm having the same problem on a similar setup with an i810e.
> Removing debian/patches/009_i810_xv_blue_bar_fix.diff and rebuilding
> fixes it for me. This fails to address bug #131602, which the patch
> was the original purpose of the p
I'm having the same problem on a similar setup with an i810e.
Removing debian/patches/009_i810_xv_blue_bar_fix.diff and rebuilding
fixes it for me. This fails to address bug #131602, which the patch
was the original purpose of the patch. A modification of the patch,
however, should be sufficient
dear sir,
Please quote ASAP, Please include
lead time.
Keyboard with Trackball- IBM #
01K1260 - 6 pcs
Regards,
Ronald/manila overseas inc.
fax: 36-2-498-0288 tel: 63-2-400-7685 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 05:18:32PM -0800, David Lawyer wrote:
> Package: xbase-clients
> Version: 4.2.1-3
>
> When I type startx at the console, it creates an X window with an x in
> the center but it only lasts for about 1 second. I then get back to the
> text interface with "waiting for X serve
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 09:59:53PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> It doesn't say 'No such file or directory' but 'No such device', meaning
> the driver isn't available, i.e. the agpgart module isn't loaded or
> isn't available.
Ah, ENODEV, not ENOENT.
Thanks for pointing that out.
--
G. Branden
I'm having the same problem on a similar setup with an i810e.
Removing debian/patches/009_i810_xv_blue_bar_fix.diff and rebuilding
fixes it for me. This fails to address bug #131602, which the patch
was the original purpose of the patch. A modification of the patch,
however, should be sufficient
What does the kde display manager do when you ask it for a console login? The
reason I ask is I would like to know if there is a way short of
/etc/init.d/kdm restart to get the display manager back after going for a
console login.
Warren
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
Group of Linux Users in Memphis
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.2.1-3
When I type startx at the console, it creates an X window with an x in
the center but it only lasts for about 1 second. I then get back to the
text interface with "waiting for X server to shut down". Now if I snoop
with: startx 2&> me
I find that me contai
What does the kde display manager do when you ask it for a console login? The
reason I ask is I would like to know if there is a way short of
/etc/init.d/kdm restart to get the display manager back after going for a
console login.
Warren
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
Group of Linux Users in Memphis
On Mit, 2002-11-13 at 23:30, Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Die, 2002-11-12 at 20:41, Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
> >>How can it be so little while having 32MB of videoRAM?
> >
> > The amount of memory available for textures is the total amount of video
> > RAM minus the amou
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.2.1-3
When I type startx at the console, it creates an X window with an x in
the center but it only lasts for about 1 second. I then get back to the
text interface with "waiting for X server to shut down". Now if I snoop
with: startx 2&> me
I find that me contai
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 04:55:03PM -0300, John Lenton wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:59:42PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 02:28:37PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > >
> > > Even the fact XDM is not started during the installation is a
> > > potentialy dangerous su
On Mit, 2002-11-13 at 23:30, Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Die, 2002-11-12 at 20:41, Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
> >>How can it be so little while having 32MB of videoRAM?
> >
> > The amount of memory available for textures is the total amount of video
> > RAM minus the amou
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 04:55:03PM -0300, John Lenton wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:59:42PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 02:28:37PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > >
> > > Even the fact XDM is not started during the installation is a
> > > potentialy dangerous su
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Die, 2002-11-12 at 20:41, Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
How can it be so little while having 32MB of videoRAM?
The amount of memory available for textures is the total amount of video
RAM minus the amount occupied by the front, back and depth buffers and
the pixmap cache. In
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Die, 2002-11-12 at 20:41, Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
How can it be so little while having 32MB of videoRAM?
The amount of memory available for textures is the total amount of video
RAM minus the amount occupied by the front, back and depth buffers and
the pixmap cache. In
On Mit, 2002-11-13 at 20:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> (EE) Unable to open /dev/agpgart (No such device)
[...]
> On i810 (and i810-style) chipsets you absolutely positively have to have
> the agpgart device available, and have kernel support for it, or X will
> not work.
>
> That is b
On Mit, 2002-11-13 at 20:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> (EE) Unable to open /dev/agpgart (No such device)
[...]
> On i810 (and i810-style) chipsets you absolutely positively have to have
> the agpgart device available, and have kernel support for it, or X will
> not work.
>
> That is b
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:41:20PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> For the record I list few method to disable xdm|gdm|kdm|wdm,... in my
> reference:
You seem to have left out the proper way, the Debian Way(tm)!
~# dpkg --purge xdm gdm kdm wdm
It's silly to install daemons if you're not going to us
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:41:20PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> For the record I list few method to disable xdm|gdm|kdm|wdm,... in my
> reference:
You seem to have left out the proper way, the Debian Way(tm)!
~# dpkg --purge xdm gdm kdm wdm
It's silly to install daemons if you're not going to us
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:59:42PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 02:28:37PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> >
> > Even the fact XDM is not started during the installation is a
> > potentialy dangerous surprise.
>
> What's "dangerous" about it?
>
> Having a sudden VT switc
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:59:42PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 02:28:37PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> >
> > Even the fact XDM is not started during the installation is a
> > potentialy dangerous surprise.
>
> What's "dangerous" about it?
>
> Having a sudden VT switc
Your message dated Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:01:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168947: Unable to open /dev/agpgart
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:29:47PM +, Matthew Wakeling wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-3
>
> I am using an ATI Radeon 7500 QW graphics card, with an Iiyama 1600x1200
> LCD display, connected to the digital port of the graphics card, with a
> resolution of 1600x1200. The 1280
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 02:28:37PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > I don't see why this is preferable to two other mechanisms that Debian
> > uses for the disabling of daemons:
> >
> > 1) editing /etc/init.d/* scripts to exit 0 near the top
> > 2) removing the package
>
> Are both not mechanisms b
Your message dated Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:01:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168947: Unable to open /dev/agpgart
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:59:49PM -0800, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> The dependency in x-window-system for xfonts-ase is only >>4.0.0. Is
> this still correct?
Yes.
> Did some part of the font locations or font configuration change
> between 4.2.0 and 4.2.1?
No.
> I realize that we don't have
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:29:47PM +, Matthew Wakeling wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-3
>
> I am using an ATI Radeon 7500 QW graphics card, with an Iiyama 1600x1200
> LCD display, connected to the digital port of the graphics card, with a
> resolution of 1600x1200. The 1280
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 02:28:37PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > I don't see why this is preferable to two other mechanisms that Debian
> > uses for the disabling of daemons:
> >
> > 1) editing /etc/init.d/* scripts to exit 0 near the top
> > 2) removing the package
>
> Are both not mechanisms b
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:59:49PM -0800, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> The dependency in x-window-system for xfonts-ase is only >>4.0.0. Is
> this still correct?
Yes.
> Did some part of the font locations or font configuration change
> between 4.2.0 and 4.2.1?
No.
> I realize that we don't have
Your message dated Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:41:48 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168861:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Package: Xfree86
Version: 4.1.0.1
Hi.
I install Debian woody with kernel 2.2.20-idepci in a laptop Dell Inspiron
2500 with a chipset i815. When I start x server I get a fatal server error.
This is the log /var/log/XFree86.0.log:
This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in
On Mit, 2002-11-13 at 01:00, Takashi Endo wrote:
> (**) NV(0): Option "UseFBDev" "true"
> (==) NV(0): Using HW cursor
> (**) NV(0): Using framebuffer device
> (II) Loading sub module "fbdevhw"
> (II) LoadModule: "fbdevhw"
> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libfbdevhw.a
> (II) Module fbdev
Your message dated Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:41:48 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168861:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Package: Xfree86
Version: 4.1.0.1
Hi.
I install Debian woody with kernel 2.2.20-idepci in a laptop Dell Inspiron
2500 with a chipset i815. When I start x server I get a fatal server error.
This is the log /var/log/XFree86.0.log:
This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in a
#include
* Branden Robinson [Tue, Nov 12 2002, 04:52:46AM]:
> > The content of /etc/X11/default-display-manager can be "null" or
> > any bogus word like "disabled" if this option is chosen.
>
> I don't see why this is preferable to two other mechanisms that Debian
> uses for the disabling of dae
On Mit, 2002-11-13 at 01:00, Takashi Endo wrote:
> (**) NV(0): Option "UseFBDev" "true"
> (==) NV(0): Using HW cursor
> (**) NV(0): Using framebuffer device
> (II) Loading sub module "fbdevhw"
> (II) LoadModule: "fbdevhw"
> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libfbdevhw.a
> (II) Module fbdev
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-3
I am using an ATI Radeon 7500 QW graphics card, with an Iiyama 1600x1200
LCD display, connected to the digital port of the graphics card, with a
resolution of 1600x1200. The 1280th pixel column on the display is
missing. That is the 1279th pixel column is
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-3
I am using an ATI Radeon 7500 QW graphics card, with an Iiyama 1600x1200
LCD display, connected to the digital port of the graphics card, with a
resolution of 1600x1200. The 1280th pixel column on the display is
missing. That is the 1279th pixel column is
Thanks.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 04:52:46AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 02:44:13PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Request: refine install script for newbie
> >
> > When display manager are installed, script rightfully asks which display
> > manager to install using insta
41 matches
Mail list logo
