Re: automatic generation of html's - or not?

2001-04-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:51:07AM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote: > >> I have commited links.tags yesterday, in order to fix some problems with > >> the > >> translation I work on (PT). However, as of today, the site still looks the > >> same. How often are the HTMLs generated? (or are they manually

Debian security FAQ

2001-04-19 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Can we put the text below online somewhere on the security pages? I get those questions a bit too often these days so it would be nice if there was a page I could point people to. Wichert. security FAQ thingies Q: The signature on your advisories does not verify correctly A: This is most likely

adding advertising suggestion to cdimage.d.o/faq

2001-04-19 Thread Matt Kraai
Howdy, Per a recent discussion on debian-release, I'd like to add the following note to the cdimage.d.o faq: diff -u -r1.1 faq.wml --- english/faq.wml 2001/02/28 19:07:58 1.1 +++ english/faq.wml 2001/04/19 14:51:25 @@ -288,6 +288,10 @@ Unofficial Non-free/Non-US +We suggest that

Re: adding advertising suggestion to cdimage.d.o/faq

2001-04-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 07:53:54AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > Per a recent discussion on debian-release, I'd like to add the > following note to the cdimage.d.o faq: > > diff -u -r1.1 faq.wml > --- english/faq.wml 2001/02/28 19:07:58 1.1 > +++ english/faq.wml 2001/04/19 14:51:25 > @@ -288,

Re: adding advertising suggestion to cdimage.d.o/faq

2001-04-19 Thread Matt Kraai
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 05:15:34PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 07:53:54AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > > Per a recent discussion on debian-release, I'd like to add the > > following note to the cdimage.d.o faq: > > > > diff -u -r1.1 faq.wml > > --- english/faq.wml 2001/02/28

message never showing up in debian-user archive

2001-04-19 Thread Robert Brown
My several messages never show up in the debian-user mail archive. I do not subscribe to debian-user. I do know that the message got through, though, because someone responded to it. Am I doing something wrong? Thanks.

Re: Debian security FAQ

2001-04-19 Thread Martin Schulze
I'll do it later, assuming nobody does it before. I'd also like to put our list of duties online which we once discussed and which *cough* has to be somewhere in the archive... Regards, Joey -- Life is too short to run proprietary software. -- Bdale Garbee

Re: Debian security FAQ

2001-04-19 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Martin Schulze wrote: > I'll do it later, assuming nobody does it before. Josip already made the changes. Wichert. -- / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian security FAQ

2001-04-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:01:57PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Can we put the text below online somewhere on the security pages? > I get those questions a bit too often these days so it would be > nice if there was a page I could point people to. Done. We should probably put the debian-secur

Re: Debian security FAQ

2001-04-19 Thread Martin Schulze
Josip Rodin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:01:57PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > Can we put the text below online somewhere on the security pages? > > I get those questions a bit too often these days so it would be > > nice if there was a page I could point people to. > > Done. > > We s

Bug#94528: intro/why_debian updates (koffice, openhardware, misc.)

2001-04-19 Thread Matt Zimmerman
Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2001-04-19 Severity: minor Under "Lack of popular commercial software", KOffice should be mentioned as an office suite, specifically one available in Debian proper. The openhardware.org website does not currently resolve, and the last time I looked a

Re: automatic generation of html's - or not?

2001-04-19 Thread Jaime E . Villate
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:51:07AM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote: > Ok, it has updated today. IIRC, the previous timestamp was Apr 16 16:46, so I > assume there is a crontab that updates the pages every 2 days. Carlos has received a reply already, but I'll answer too, to make sure I understand (I'm

Major updates to the security pages

2001-04-19 Thread James A. Treacy
The security pages have just gone through a major overhaul. All language independent or automatically translated material is in a .data file in the english security directory. Translators only need to translate the .wml files. Existing translations have been semi-automatically updated. In certain

Re: Debian security FAQ

2001-04-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 07:19:32PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > Can we put the text below online somewhere on the security pages? > > > I get those questions a bit too often these days so it would be > > > nice if there was a page I could point people to. > > > > Done. > > > > We should pro

Re: Debian security FAQ

2001-04-19 Thread Martin Schulze
Josip Rodin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 07:19:32PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > > Can we put the text below online somewhere on the security pages? > > > > I get those questions a bit too often these days so it would be > > > > nice if there was a page I could point people to. > > > > >

Re: automatic generation of html's - or not?

2001-04-19 Thread James A. Treacy
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 07:13:28PM +0100, Jaime E . Villate wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:51:07AM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote: > > Ok, it has updated today. IIRC, the previous timestamp was Apr 16 16:46, so > > I > > assume there is a crontab that updates the pages every 2 days. > > Carlos

Re: Debian security FAQ

2001-04-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 08:46:21PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > > > Can we put the text below online somewhere on the security pages? > > > > > I get those questions a bit too often these days so it would be > > > > > nice if there was a page I could point people to. > > > > > > > > Done. >

Web Page - Security Alerts section

2001-04-19 Thread Brian J. Erickson
Hello, I was looking your web page in the section titled 'Security Alerts'. I noticed that the dates don't make sense. The most recently posted security updates are dated March 15-March 19. I assuming they should be April 15-19. Because you an April 9th before March 15th, which doesn't make any s

Re: Web Page - Security Alerts section

2001-04-19 Thread James A. Treacy
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 01:06:44PM -0700, Brian J. Erickson wrote: > > I was looking your web page in the section titled > 'Security Alerts'. > > I noticed that the dates don't make sense. > The most recently posted security updates > are dated March 15-March 19. > I assuming they should be April

Re: Web Page - Security Alerts section

2001-04-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 01:29:26PM -0700, James A. Treacy wrote: > > I was looking your web page in the section titled > > 'Security Alerts'. > > > > I noticed that the dates don't make sense. > > The most recently posted security updates > > are dated March 15-March 19. > > I assuming they should

pt_pt + pt_br

2001-04-19 Thread Carlos Laviola
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 19-Apr-2001 Jaime E . Villate wrote: > By the way, can I give you a hand with the Portuguese translation? I speak > continental Portuguese so together we may come out with translations > acceptable both in Brazil and Portugal, rather than having to

parse-advisory.pl

2001-04-19 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi mstone, others, I've made a script that parses advisory files found in pandora:/org/security.debian.org/advisories/DSA/ and makes WML files out of them. With the latest advisories it worked well, in fact with the last one I didn't have to do one bit of manual editing. I did check the files, of