Hi,
On Wed Feb 02, 2011 at 18:06:16 +0100, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> Hi all,
> here the link [1] to the todo list and the timeline for
> the Squeeze release and new design switch.
we moved to a gobby server in the mean time:
use gobby-0.5 (important, not the default gobby one) and c
Hi all,
here the link [1] to the todo list and the timeline for
the Squeeze release and new design switch.
Cheers,
Francesca
[1] http://titanpad.com/Q4HqTiXvG7
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> So long. :)
> Rhonda
Yes, that was the reason for the use of *selected* word.
IMHO website is more useful for persistent and more structured contents.
Something like a todo list is much more practically managed on a wiki, that
could
also be true for other topics. Anyway, I migrated conten
Am Samstag, den 04.10.2008, 09:38 +0200 schrieb Francesco P. Lovergine:
> And talking about the wiki, I also think that some *selected* topics should be
> moved to the wiki and linked by the website. The level of integration among
> the website and the wiki is generally quite low currently, which i
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> And talking about the wiki, I also think that some *selected* topics
> should be moved to the wiki and linked by the website. The level of
> integration among the website and the wiki is generally quite low
> currently, which
on the wiki
> at http://wiki.debian.org/HelpDebian and the whole section removed.
> I think that the wiki is much more appropriate for maintainance of a TODO
> list.
*Anything* is more appropriate for maintenance of a TODO list than that file :)
--
2. That which causes joy or h
/ is dated 2006.
> > I wonder if
> > this type of contents should be reviewed and merged on the wiki
> > at http://wiki.debian.org/HelpDebian and the whole section removed.
> > I think that the wiki is much more appropriate for maintainance of a TODO
> > list.
>
>
on the wiki
> at http://wiki.debian.org/HelpDebian and the whole section removed.
> I think that the wiki is much more appropriate for maintainance of a TODO
> list.
I think this is an excellent idea!
--
Matt http://ftbfs.org/
--
T
more appropriate for maintainance of a TODO list.
Comments?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le mardi 25 avril 2006 à 21:54 +0200, Johan Walles a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> I saw the Debian TODO list at "http://www.debian.org/devel/todo/";, and
> you're the contact person for having things added to it.
I'm sorry, but to avoid dispersion, I have stopped doing WWW
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:36:04AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> I think the todo list on
> http://www.debian.org/devel/todo/
> is not up to date anymore since sarge is released.
> (new installer part)
Thanks for spotting this; I've asked debian-boot to provide us with an
updated
Hi,
I think the todo list on
http://www.debian.org/devel/todo/
is not up to date anymore since sarge is released.
(new installer part)
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
$ route add default
* doug jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-14 12:41]:
> Alfie, thanks for reviewing the CVS logs, it's nice to know that someone
> is watching for mistakes that I might make.
TBH I didn't directly review the CVS logs, it was just that the files
were already translated and I noticed it through upd
Matt, I've finally gotten around to doing a diff on the patches you
committed for the 1999 directory. Thanks for making the spelling
corrections. I'm still having problems with spaces in the content,
around the tags, hopefully next time will be better. Thanks for your
help.
Peter and Alfie, tha
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 03:48:50PM -0600, doug jensen wrote:
> Should I ask, "Please find errors in these patches." instead of "If this
> is ok could someone please commit?"
>
> Fixed patches? Attached.
Applied, thanks.
--
Matt
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 06:10:40AM -0600, doug jensen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:27:49PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > * Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 12:10]:
> > > but it is a lot more work to figure out what word was changed in a
> > > re-justified paragraph.
> >
> >
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:27:49PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 12:10]:
> > but it is a lot more work to figure out what word was changed in a
> > re-justified paragraph.
>
> I don't think that we can't overemphasis on this. Don't do it...
>
So
* Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 12:10]:
> Yes, the result may look prettier
Only in the source, the resulting webpage doesn't look anymore fancier
than without readjusting
> but it is a lot more work to figure out what word was changed in a
> re-justified paragraph.
I don'
doug jensen:
> If this set of patches are ok, could someone please commit them?
Please avoid doing formatting changes to the source when also changing
content, it makes it a lot harder to find the content changes for us
translators. Especially avoid to re-justify paragraphs. Yes, the result
may l
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:22:39AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
>
> I've committed them (modulo a bunch of typo fixes). Thanks.
>
Matt, thanks for making all those corrections and committing the patches
for the undated directory.
This next set of patches are for the webwml/english/security/1999
di
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 12:57:38PM -0600, doug jensen wrote:
> Attached are patches for the 'undated' security advisories. After they
> are applied there will be four _unpatched_ advisories in that directory,
> three for 'xfree' and one for 'mc'. At this time it doesn't appear
> that I will find
Hello,
Attached are patches for the 'undated' security advisories. After they
are applied there will be four _unpatched_ advisories in that directory,
three for 'xfree' and one for 'mc'. At this time it doesn't appear
that I will find any useable information for those four advisories.
If all th
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:38:19AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > ## This change allows "Vulnerable" to be "Yes" and "Security database
> > ## reference" to be displayed.
> > --- security/undated/1ssh.data.old Thu Apr 19 09:52:11 2001
> > +++ security/undated/1ssh.data.new Sat Jul 19 17:37:41 200
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:03:43AM -0600, doug jensen wrote:
> > -Yes
> > +yes
> ...
> > Why do you change the case of "yes"?
>
> I'm guessing that the isvulnerable tag is case sensitive. Changing the
> case causes the "yes" to be displayed on the web page.
It looks like most of the undated advi
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:38:19AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> I've applied the changes for buzz, but I couldn't find any uses
> for rex. Could you point me to one?
You are correct, there is nothing using the rex code at this time. The
code seemed more complete with it included, but it will pro
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:24:02PM -0600, doug jensen wrote:
> An email sent to debian-security, asking for comments from Matt and/or
> Javier, received no response.
>
> So, I'm wondering if anyone wants to commit the following three patches?
> Thanks for your consideration.
Thanks for cleaning t
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:15:14AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * doug jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-20 18:53]:
> > So, I will make those corrections and send the patches back to the list
> > to be commited, or bug reports to www.debian.org, or ...?
>
> Send them to the list, IMHO no need
* doug jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-20 18:53]:
> So, I will make those corrections and send the patches back to the list
> to be commited, or bug reports to www.debian.org, or ...?
Send them to the list, IMHO no need to bloat the BTS with it. If noone
reacts you can still send them to the
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 11:43:49PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> What about the debian-security-announce list archive?
I intend to work on those also.
> Looks okay... but I'd move the note about potential problems below the list,
> and remove the last three items -- visitors don't really care much
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 02:16:19PM -0600, doug jensen wrote:
> Find the "moreinfo" entries for older years that contain mentions
> of lists-archives instead of including text from it or even linking
> to it, and correct it.
>
> There are many advisories in 1997 and early 1998 that lack eve
Hi,
On the Debian Web Pages TODO List, there is the following section:
security
Find the "moreinfo" entries for older years that contain mentions
of lists-archives instead of including text from it or even linking
to it, and correct it.
There are many advisories in 1997 and
anslated items not shown on todo list
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:30:42 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRAS
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-03-13 12:30]:
> Todo-List items for the general todo list (http://www.debian.org/devel/todo/)
> are not displayed on non-english pages when they are not translated. The
> untranslated item should be used as a fallback.
Urks, I thou
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-03-13
Severity: normal
Hi.
Todo-List items for the general todo list (http://www.debian.org/devel/todo/)
are not displayed on non-english pages when they are not translated. The
untranslated item should be used as a fallback.
Actual example
Le ven 11/10/2002 à 11:57, Peter Karlsson a écrit :
> Gerfried Fuchs:
>
> > Well, that doesn't _really_ work properly in the translations.
>
> I know. The problem is that without pointing to the english dir, a
> translation that does *not* have all the entries fails completely to
> show anything
ake into
consideration the translations now that I noticed that some
translations actually have translated the todo entries themselves.
> I dislike the idea of not being able to translate the entries in the
> todo list, especially for there are some that will stay for ever.
--
\\/
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 07:19:46PM +0200, Nils Lohner wrote:
> - figure out who owns and updates http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/ix/pseudopack
> ages.html so that we can add more pseudo packages to submit bugs against
The FTP admins, the master copy is available using anonymous rsync in
ftp-master.d
On 19-Oct-98 Craig Small wrote:
> Urgh, it's one big chunk of text, I assume you don't mean it for it to
> be read as html.
Actually, I had never looked at it as HTML but I had *intended* for it to be
browser readable... oOps :(
> seeS is my nick on irc, I've had a look on some sites but I email
Darren Benham wrote:
> Well people, I added a todo list html. If you want to look at it, it's
> located
> at http://www.debian.org/todo.html (or just check it out from CVS). I did it
> mostly for myself, so that I had a list in common between home and work.
Urgh, it's on
Well people, I added a todo list html. If you want to look at it, it's located
at http://www.debian.org/todo.html (or just check it out from CVS). I did it
mostly for myself, so that I had a list in common between home and
Chad Zimmerman wrote:
> > - get the entire pages indexed for searching. Anyone want
> >to volunteer to work on this? Verisim is currently doing
> >the entire site. Nothing against Verisim. I'd just prefer
> >something under our control. Free would be preferable too.
> >Guy and I ha
On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, James A. Treacy wrote:
> Chad Zimmerman wrote:
> > > - get the entire pages indexed for searching. Anyone want
> > >to volunteer to work on this? Verisim is currently doing
> > >the entire site. Nothing against Verisim. I'd just prefer
> > >something under our con
On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, James A.Treacy wrote:
> > > - fix up the doc section
> >
> > Could you please provide us with a few more details here?
> >
> Nothing to do with you or any of the docs Debian provides. It's
> simply that the current organization of that page isn't very good.
> Put another wa
On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, James A.Treacy wrote:
> Here are the things I'd like to see done on the pages.
> Feel free to add anything you'd like.
>
> - get the entire pages indexed for searching. Anyone want
>to volunteer to work on this? Verisim is currently doing
>the entire site. Nothing ag
> > - fix up the doc section
>
> Could you please provide us with a few more details here?
>
Nothing to do with you or any of the docs Debian provides. It's
simply that the current organization of that page isn't very good.
Put another way, I want to change how the docs are presented on
the web
On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, James A.Treacy wrote:
[snip]
> - fix up the doc section
Could you please provide us with a few more details here?
Thanks,
Chris
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
! ___; [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAI
Here are the things I'd like to see done on the pages.
Feel free to add anything you'd like.
- get the entire pages indexed for searching. Anyone want
to volunteer to work on this? Verisim is currently doing
the entire site. Nothing against Verisim. I'd just prefer
something under our co
47 matches
Mail list logo
