On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:24:02PM -0600, doug jensen wrote:
> An email sent to debian-security, asking for comments from Matt and/or
> Javier, received no response.
>
> So, I'm wondering if anyone wants to commit the following three patches?
> Thanks for your consideration.
Thanks for cleaning this up. I have a few questions below.
> # Allows the "fixed in" data to be displayed (for Buzz/Rex).
> # Affects several DSAs in the 1998, 1997, and undated directories.
> # This template isn't being used for current DSAs, last used in 1998.
> --- template/debian/fixes_link.wml.old Fri Nov 1 06:16:30 2002
> +++ template/debian/fixes_link.wml.new Sat Jul 19 17:26:53 2003
> @@ -16,6 +16,12 @@
> <define-tag notapplicable whitespace=delete>
> <gettext>N/A</gettext>
> </define-tag>
> +<define-tag in1_1 whitespace=delete>
> + <gettext>in release 1.1</gettext>
> +</define-tag>
> +<define-tag in1_2 whitespace=delete>
> + <gettext>in release 1.2</gettext>
> +</define-tag>
> <define-tag in1_3 whitespace=delete>
> <gettext>in release 1.3</gettext>
> </define-tag>
> @@ -41,6 +47,14 @@
> if ( $release eq "not" )
> {
> $str = "<notneeded/>";
> + }
> + elsif ( $release eq "buzz" )
> + {
> + $str = "$arch - (<in1_1/>) $version";
> + }
> + elsif ( $release eq "rex" )
> + {
> + $str = "$arch - (<in1_2/>) $version";
> }
> elsif ( $release eq "bo" )
> {
I've applied the changes for buzz, but I couldn't find any uses
for rex. Could you point me to one?
> ## This change allows "Vulnerable" to be "Yes" and "Security database
> ## reference" to be displayed.
> --- security/undated/1ssh.data.old Thu Apr 19 09:52:11 2001
> +++ security/undated/1ssh.data.new Sat Jul 19 17:37:41 2003
> @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
> <define-tag pagetitle>ssh</define-tag>
> <define-tag report_date>undated</define-tag>
> +<define-tag secrefs>CA-1998-03</define-tag>
> <define-tag packages>ssh</define-tag>
> -<define-tag isvulnerable>Yes</define-tag>
> +<define-tag isvulnerable>yes</define-tag>
> <define-tag fixed>Yes</define-tag>
>
> #use wml::debian::security
Why do you change the case of "yes"?
--
Matt
