-=| Boyuan Yang, 15.01.2023 21:06:33 -0500 |=-
> Hi all,
>
> 在 2023-01-14星期六的 18:35 +0200，Damyan Ivanov写道：
> > -=| Jeff Cutsinger, 14.01.2023 09:41:14 -0600 |=-
> > > On 11 Jan 2023 2:19 PM, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is somehow an interesting case. The use of is semantically
> > > >
Hi all,
在 2023-01-14星期六的 18:35 +0200，Damyan Ivanov写道：
> -=| Jeff Cutsinger, 14.01.2023 09:41:14 -0600 |=-
> > On 11 Jan 2023 2:19 PM, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> >
> > > This is somehow an interesting case. The use of is semantically
> > > correct since these spaces are indeed non-breaking to form a s
-=| Jeff Cutsinger, 14.01.2023 09:41:14 -0600 |=-
> On 11 Jan 2023 2:19 PM, Boyuan Yang wrote:
>
> > This is somehow an interesting case. The use of is semantically
> > correct since these spaces are indeed non-breaking to form a single APT
> > line.
But this is already achieved by wrapping the
On 11 Jan 2023 2:19 PM, Boyuan Yang wrote:
This is somehow an interesting case. The use of is semantically
correct since these spaces are indeed non-breaking to form a single APT
line.
I disagree. The spaces separating the line of text I'm typing are not
non-breaking, but this is still a si
Hi,
在 2023-01-08星期日的 06:54 -0600，Jeff Cutsinger写道：
> Apologies if this is the wrong place to report this.
>
> On the page https://www.debian.org/security/, the APT sources.list code
> is incorrect. Instead of
>
> `deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-
> security main contrib
Apologies if this is the wrong place to report this.
On the page https://www.debian.org/security/, the APT sources.list code
is incorrect. Instead of
`deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main contrib
non-free`
it should be
`deb http://security.debian.org/debian
> If it's the first link, perhaps there is a problem on the page only with
> your langage preference. In this case, what are the langage preferences
> in you browser (in order to fix it)?
it will be 406 not acceptable error in the worst case in the scenario;
but as index.html (symlink to index.en.
On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 18:27 +0100, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
> Hello Nikos,
>
> thank you for your interest in Debian and your report.
>
> Le 29/01/2017 à 15:55, nikos zmpr a écrit :
> > Dear debian website team,
> >
> > I have found that when clickin
Hello Nikos,
thank you for your interest in Debian and your report.
Le 29/01/2017 à 15:55, nikos zmpr a écrit :
> Dear debian website team,
>
> I have found that when clicking to "security page" link, at the
> debian.org homepage ( For older security advisories see the
Dear debian website team,
I have found that when clicking to "security page" link, at the debian.org
homepage ( For older security advisories see the Security
Page<https://www.debian.org/security/>. ), I was presented by a 403 forbidden
error message (You don't have
Your message dated Sun, 29 Apr 2007 09:24:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421433: www.debian.org: Broken link to apt in security page
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 03:35:53AM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> At http://www.debian.org/security/
> http://packages.debian.org/stable/base/apt is broken link.
Hello,
The link has been fixed and replaced by
http://packages.debian.org/stable/admin/apt
The modification will appear on the website
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
At http://www.debian.org/security/
http://packages.debian.org/stable/base/apt is broken link.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 10:56:23AM -0700, Andrew T. Young wrote:
> You can use apt to easily get the latest security updates. This requires a
> line such as
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main contrib non-free
>
> in your /etc/apt/sources.list file.
This is correct.
>
The standard security page at
http://www.debian.org/security/
says:
You can use apt to easily get the latest security updates. This requires a
line such as
deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main contrib non-free
in your /etc/apt/sources.list file.
However, when I
Your message dated Tue, 8 Jul 2003 20:45:46 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#200471: www.debian.org: security page out of date with
respect to alerts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
* Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-08 10:35]:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:54:58AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>> Please reassign to security team if the problem is on their end.
>
> I think there is a manual step involved here that I am not aware of
> and do not have privileges to e
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:54:58AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-08
> Severity: important
>
> I keep forcing a refresh, but:
>
> http://www.debian.org/security/
>
> continues to not display the most recent 4 Debian Security Adv
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:54:58AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I keep forcing a refresh, but:
>
> http://www.debian.org/security/
>
> continues to not display the most recent 4 Debian Security Advisories.
>
> They are:
>
> [DSA-339-1] New semi, wemi packages fix insecure temporary file cre
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-08 08:54]:
> [DSA-339-1] New semi, wemi packages fix insecure temporary file creation
> [DSA-340-1] New x-face-el packages fix insecure temporary file creation]
> [DSA-341-1] New liece packages fix insecure temporary file creation
> [DSA-342-1] New mo
Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-08
Severity: important
I keep forcing a refresh, but:
http://www.debian.org/security/
continues to not display the most recent 4 Debian Security Advisories.
They are:
[DSA-339-1] New semi, wemi packages fix insecure temporary file
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, David Fu wrote:
> in your /etc/apt/sources.list file. Then executing
>
>apt-get update
>
> will fetch and install the security updates on your system. See the
> Securing Debian manual (section 4.8) for more details.
That will just update your packages l
Hello Debian Web Maintainers,
I've been using Debian for a few years now, and only
today after a careful search of the Securing Debian
Manual, have I confirmed what I thought was the case
about security updates in Debian.
The ff is verbatim from the security page:
Keeping your Debian s
)
how to use apt, and it's served me powerfully. However, the bit on the
security page, I felt, was just shy of being complete; imagining myself as a
strapped-for-time entry-level sysadmin who knows how to search the web and use
'apt-get install' and 'apt-get remove' but l
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 05:58:17PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
>
> The apt line is what I'm talking about. The structure of the security
> site has changed for every release, and apt lines have not been
> portable. Maybe we've finally hit upon a formula that we'll keep, but
> I'd prefer to watch t
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Michael Stone wrote:
> There has always been a valid reason for changing it. The last one
> (slink->potato) was to split the single archive directory into
> main,contrib,non-free. There are no further changes planned, but changes
So? That change was made for non-technical rea
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 04:23:32PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Michael Stone wrote:
> > The apt line is what I'm talking about. The structure of the security
> > site has changed for every release, and apt lines have not been
>
> If you want to keep it constant then commit
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Michael Stone wrote:
> The apt line is what I'm talking about. The structure of the security
> site has changed for every release, and apt lines have not been
If you want to keep it constant then commit to not changing it. There
isn't any reason at all that you should have to
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 02:56:38PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 12:50:31PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> > We have never (not even once) had a security url that worked between
> > releases. I don't want to pretend that we do unless there's some
> > historical evidence for
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 12:50:31PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 11:54:32AM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
> > As an aside, would the security people have any problem with me changinge
> > the deb line to
> > deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-fre
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 11:54:32AM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 11:58:23AM +0100, Christoph Fabianek wrote:
> > the line deb http://security.debian.org/ potato/updates main contrib
> > non-free
> > did not work for me, and after a look at the server I saw that it should
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 11:58:23AM +0100, Christoph Fabianek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> on http://www.debian.org/security/ the 5th paragraph says:
> You may find it convenient to use apt to get the latest security updates.
> This requires a line such as
> deb http://security.debian.org/ potato/updates mai
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000 09:21:07 +0200 (CEST), peter karlsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> era eriksson:
>> May I humbly suggest the following changes to the
>> http://www.debian.org/security/index.sv.html
> Say, we could use a little help on the Swedish translation team,
> want to join us?
I'm s
era eriksson:
> May I humbly suggest the following changes to the
> http://www.debian.org/security/index.sv.html
Thank you. I'm incorporating some of your changes, but some deviate too far
from the original text to be called translations, so I'm not including
those. However, I've reworded all the
Package: www.debian.org
Version: 2919
Severity: normal
May I humbly suggest the following changes to the
http://www.debian.org/security/index.sv.html
--- index.sv.html.orig Wed Sep 13 15:02:44 2000
+++ index.sv.html Tue Sep 19 09:51:30 2000
@@ -36,14 +36,14 @@
De flesta säkerhetsprob
On Sat, Feb 13, 1999 at 12:49:03PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
> One solution is not point to an exact version, but the directory it will be
> in and state that the version should be greater than x. For the case above
> that would be:
>
> ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/source/net>
On Sat, Feb 13, 1999 at 11:43:04AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> Tell me if you have any thoughts on how to implement this: what I'd really
> like to see is the ability to say somthing like type=deb package=netstd version=3.07> and have the build process check
> incoming, proposed-updates, and sta
On Sat, Feb 13, 1999 at 01:30:10AM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
> Below is a modified version of 19990104.wml which includes the
> English and Croatian text. Note how the definition of 'Source'
> uses a tag so it gets translated for free from its (future)
> definition in the template file.
>
Jay
and modify the page in the Packages/stable section of
the
website to make note of this. You would then simply point to
http://www.debian.org/Packages/stable//.html
The daily updates of the package section will take care of all the links for you
since these pages contain links to the source and a
Ok. I didn't see this until after I wrote the other message. This is looking
good.
On Sat, Feb 13, 1999 at 01:30:10AM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
> href=ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/source/net/netstd_3.07.orig.tar.gz>ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/source/net/nets
Below is a modified version of 19990104.wml which includes the
English and Croatian text. Note how the definition of 'Source'
uses a tag so it gets translated for free from its (future)
definition in the template file.
Jay Treacy
netstd
4 Jan 1999
netstd
[EN:buffer overflows in bootpd an
Below is a modified version of 19990104.wml which includes the
English and Croatian text. Note how the definition of 'Source'
uses a tag so it gets translated for free from its (future)
definition in the template file.
Jay Treacy
begin 19990104.wml
netstd
42 matches
Mail list logo
