Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-18 09:22]:
> > So... are you going to commit your code and I should with mine and see
> > whether it works as expected?
>
> Which my code? It is committed already. If you mean the changes to
> have the in the event page itse
* Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-18 09:22]:
> So... are you going to commit your code and I should with mine and see
> whether it works as expected?
Which my code? It is committed already. If you mean the changes to
have the in the event page itself and have it in the
headers of t
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-17 21:57]:
> > What about this patch and the attached script?
> >
> > @@ -14,3 +15,10 @@
> >
> > %.$(LANGUAGE).html: %.wml $(TEMPLDIR)/event.wml
> > $(WML) $( > +
> > +Makefile.reports:
> > + $(ENGLISHSRCDIR)/events/mak
* Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-17 21:57]:
> What about this patch and the attached script?
>
> @@ -14,3 +15,10 @@
>
> %.$(LANGUAGE).html: %.wml $(TEMPLDIR)/event.wml
> $(WML) $( +
> +Makefile.reports:
> + $(ENGLISHSRCDIR)/events/make_makefile_reports.pl
> $(ENGLISHSRCD
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-16 21:49]:
> > Makefile.local is created by a perlie that first reads all local
> > foo-report.wml files and prints "foo.wml: foo-report.wml" (or was it
> > "foo.$(LANG).html: foo-report.wml"). Then, if LANG is not english, it
>
* Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-16 21:49]:
> Makefile.local is created by a perlie that first reads all local
> foo-report.wml files and prints "foo.wml: foo-report.wml" (or was it
> "foo.$(LANG).html: foo-report.wml"). Then, if LANG is not english, it
> repeats in $ENGLISHDIR, but l
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-14 11:18]:
> > Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >> It includes two ways to see if there is a report for that event:
> >> -) First is to grep through the event page and look for a
> >> link, extract the URL from
> >>there.
> >
>
* Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-14 11:18]:
> Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>> It includes two ways to see if there is a report for that event:
>> -) First is to grep through the event page and look for a
>> link, extract the URL from
>>there.
>
> I'd rather scan the directory for a
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Please find attached the diff I promised for the events pages, to make
> the reports more visible. It will be added to the index pages at the
> end of the line as [Report].
Thanks a lot.
> It includes two ways to see if there is a report for that event:
> -) First is to
* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-13 17:08]:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 03:14:20PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>> +? " []"
>
> Just put Report there.
Uhm, that could make sense, of course >:-) I tried/thought of
different aproaches first and had one which used a short tag
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 03:14:20PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> And it introduced a new gettext string, called "Report" (how convinient
> ;). I had to add it to common_tags.wml for not making the
> recent_list.wml dependent on events_common.wml which would IMHO just
> reduce the throughput on o
Hi!
Please find attached the diff I promised for the events pages, to make
the reports more visible. It will be added to the index pages at the
end of the line as [Report].
It includes two ways to see if there is a report for that event:
-) First is to grep through the event page and l
12 matches
Mail list logo