Hi Guiseppe,
Laura Arjona Reina wrote (Thu, 1 Jul 2021 14:02:21 +0200):
> Hello Giuseppe
>
>
> El 1/7/21 a las 11:55, Giuseppe Sacco escribió:
> > Hello,
> > I am currently receiving all messages sent to the consultants@d.o alias. Who
> > should I contact in order to update my email address in
Hello,
I am currently receiving all messages sent to the consultants@d.o alias. Who
should I contact in order to update my email address in the alias?
Thank you,
Giuseppe
Hello Giuseppe
El 1/7/21 a las 11:55, Giuseppe Sacco escribió:
> Hello,
> I am currently receiving all messages sent to the consultants@d.o alias. Who
> should I contact in order to update my email address in the alias?
>
Here is ok, or if you prefer non-public address, you can send the details
Your message dated Sat, 30 May 2015 10:08:16 +0200
with message-id <20150530100816.7e5ca3003bda84004bd8a...@wansing-online.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#655484: Debian Consultants page maintenance
has caused the Debian Bug report #655484,
regarding www.debian.org: Debian Consultants page appe
Thanks Holger for working on this!
I see you've been updating the consultants data; maybe this bug can be
closed?
In https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Webmaster/ we have a "Get involved >
Medium tasks" section with some other update tasks. My suggestion would
be to create a similar entry for consultan
Hi,
Brian Potkin wrote:
> On Tue 10 Dec 2013 at 19:08:06 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > On Lu, 09 dec 13, 21:59:25, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I would vote for "project": I think project is only a substantive here,
> > > > you could also
On Tue 10 Dec 2013 at 19:08:06 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 09 dec 13, 21:59:25, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > >
> > > I would vote for "project": I think project is only a substantive here,
> > > you could also say "Debian organisation". "Debian project"
Hi,
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 09 dec 13, 21:59:25, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >
> > I would vote for "project": I think project is only a substantive here,
> > you could also say "Debian organisation". "Debian project" is not a
> > strictly defined term. Like the trademark is for "Debian", no
On Lu, 09 dec 13, 21:59:25, Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> I would vote for "project": I think project is only a substantive here,
> you could also say "Debian organisation". "Debian project" is not a
> strictly defined term. Like the trademark is for "Debian", not "Debian
> Project"
> IMHO.
Just s
Hi,
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 08 dec 13, 23:38:12, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >
> > Index: english/consultants/index.wml
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/consultants/index.wml,v
> > retrieving revision 1.24
> > dif
On Du, 08 dec 13, 23:38:12, Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> Index: english/consultants/index.wml
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/consultants/index.wml,v
> retrieving revision 1.24
> diff -r1.24 index.wml
> 21a22,27
> >
> > The
Hi,
Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 26/07/2013 alle 09.24 +0300, Andrei POPESCU ha scritto:
> [...]
> > I think this is a bit too specific. I'd rather have something
> > generalised:
> >
> > The list is provided as is, without any guarantee or endorsement by
> > Debian. Entries
Hi all,
Il giorno ven, 26/07/2013 alle 09.24 +0300, Andrei POPESCU ha scritto:
[...]
> I think this is a bit too specific. I'd rather have something
> generalised:
>
> The list is provided as is, without any guarantee or endorsement by
> Debian. Entries are the sole responsibility of th
Adding -www to CC for a larger audience.
On Lu, 22 iul 13, 18:07:43, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one consultant proposed to add a sort of "disclaimer" to the consultants
> page:
Might be useful.
> --
Hi,
James Bromberger wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> I email consulta...@debian.org asking to be added on December 3 2011, and
> January 4 2012, and have had no response and see no update to the page. As
> a Debian Developer for >10 years, it would
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:20:09PM +, James Bromberger wrote:
> I email consulta...@debian.org asking to be added on December 3
> 2011, and January 4 2012, and have had no response and see no update
> to the page. As a Debian Developer for >10 years, it would be nice
> to be listed here.
I ha
Hi James,
On Mi, 11 ian 12, 16:20:09, James Bromberger wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> I email consulta...@debian.org asking to be added on December 3 2011,
> and January 4 2012, and have had no response and see no update to the
> page. As a Debian D
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I email consulta...@debian.org asking to be added on December 3 2011, and
January 4 2012, and have had no response and see no update to the page. As a
Debian Developer for >10 years, it would be nice to be listed here.
My email from De
Hi all,
yesterday I started checking email addresses and URLs of consultants page.
Many email messages have been sent about problems on the URLs, and many
more will be sent for email checking. Please note that all these
messages have consulta...@d.o in CC, so that this action is completely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 28/05/2010 09:15, markus schnalke a écrit :
> I discovered a wrong link text on http://www.debian.org/consultants/ .
>
> ``Panama'' is listed twice, but the first one links to ``Pakistan''.
Thanks for pointing it, it's corrected, and should be onl
I discovered a wrong link text on http://www.debian.org/consultants/ .
``Panama'' is listed twice, but the first one links to ``Pakistan''.
This is easy to fix.
meillo
P.S.
Please CC me as I'm off list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 30. April 2009, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> What about "NMMN"? It is already listed without email address. Should we
> delete this entry as well?
NMMN afaik hosts at least one .debian.org machine plus two m68k debian.net
machines, so I assume they'd like to stay listed.
BCC:ing
On Thu,30.Apr.09, 18:52:48, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> We received a request for removal the email field from a consultants
> entry. I am wondering if this is possible at all, since (I believe) we
> should retain the email address in order to get in touch with the
> consultants, or to verify further r
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 30/04/2009 alle 13.09 -0700, Don Armstrong ha scritto:
> [...]
> > There should be a publicly available e-mail address that the
> > consultant can be contacted at (and responds to e-mail sent to it
> > within four weeks). If the consultant
Il giorno gio, 30/04/2009 alle 13.09 -0700, Don Armstrong ha scritto:
[...]
> There should be a publicly available e-mail address that the
> consultant can be contacted at (and responds to e-mail sent to it
> within four weeks). If the consultant doesn't want such an address
> published, then they
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> Should we just remove the field, or ask for a new email address that
> is supposed to replace the old one, or ask for a different email
> address that we might keep as comment in consultants.data and we
> might use for checking further requests?
There s
We received a request for removal the email field from a consultants
entry. I am wondering if this is possible at all, since (I believe) we
should retain the email address in order to get in touch with the
consultants, or to verify further requests about the same entry.
Should we just remove the f
Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> 1. is there any ordering for all consultants in the same country?
I think it might be roughly date-ordered, but it's not consistent.
> 2. I noticed a lot of pages with "additional_info" translated. Should we
> ask the submitter for additional_info translations?
I don't k
[Sorry Andrei, this was meant to be sent to the list]
Hi all,
I started adding three entries to the consultants page, but I have a few
questions:
1. is there any ordering for all consultants in the same country?
2. I noticed a lot of pages with "additional_info" translated. Should
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 03:00:51PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-09 14:30:50 CEST]:
> > It seems to have become a lost and/or not transmitted knowledge that
> > the container has to contain some tag which accomplishes
> > two things: It prints the c
* Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-09 14:30:50 CEST]:
> It seems to have become a lost and/or not transmitted knowledge that
> the container has to contain some tag which accomplishes
> two things: It prints the country name, and it counts the consultant for
> the list at the top.
.
Hi!
Recently I stumbled upon a b0rked commit done by amp to the
consultants.data file which ended up in a build error of the page. On
investigating what was going on I noticed some other entries that
doesn't seem to work with the usual workflow of the file.
It seems to have become a los
om: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: consultants page out of date
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 14:02:33 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I already submitted the following request for inclusion in the
consultants page twice, in December and in February, since i didn't
receive any feedback todate I'm now adding debian-www in the CC, just
in case the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] has gone stale.
We are a you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package www.debian.org
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: www.debian.org
> owner 264637 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#264637: www.debian.org: consultants page out of date
Owner recorded as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> thanks mate
Stopping processing here.
Pleas
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
I'll forward a list of needed changes when I get a bug #.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (101, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:00:43PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 09:56:49PM +0100, Kaare Olsen wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:38:53 -0800
> > Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Currently there are problems with some of the Spanish and Brazilian
> > > > entrie
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 09:56:49PM +0100, Kaare Olsen wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:38:53 -0800
> Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Currently there are problems with some of the Spanish and Brazilian
> > > entries (and there may be more problems).
> >
> > I've fixed the ones that I
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 09:56:49PM +0100, Kaare Olsen wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:38:53 -0800
> Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Currently there are problems with some of the Spanish and Brazilian
> > > entries (and there may be more problems).
> >
> > I've fixed the ones that I
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:38:53 -0800
Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Currently there are problems with some of the Spanish and Brazilian
> > entries (and there may be more problems).
>
> I've fixed the ones that I found, and will check in this evening.
On http://www-master.debian.org/~ba
a
> [...]
>
> Matt, you and the other maintainers of the consultants page have to
> replace all non-ASCII characters with HTML entities, since the entries
> from consultant.data is used with different encodings in the various
> translations. Peter Karlsson pointed this out in a cvs
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 22:21:19 -0700
Debian WWW CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Changes by: kraai 03/02/27 22:21:19
>
> Modified files:
> english/consultants: consultant.data
[...]
Matt, you and the other maintainers of the consultants page have to
replace all non-ASC
David Martinez CSIC RedIRIS wrote:
> Hello. Have you seen http://www.debian.org/consultants/ ? In every
> language
> appear some annoying tags like "<<< consultant.data === >>>
> 1.161". I'm looking consultants.data but didn't find anything conclusive.
> Have you changed somet
Hello. Have you seen http://www.debian.org/consultants/ ? In every
language
appear some annoying tags like "<<< consultant.data === >>>
1.161". I'm looking consultants.data but didn't find anything conclusive.
Have you changed something (scripts, perl...) in klecker?
I submitted changes to the consultants pages a few days ago (added new
consultants, and the new country code changes). Although I notice that
these pages haven't been updated since I checked in the new version?
What's up?
Behan
--
Behan Webster mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
45 matches
Mail list logo
