Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-16
Severity: important
(didn't now where to send this to, we should have a virtual 'debian-ddp'
or 'documentation' package to send the DDP stuff to).
Ok. The current DDP policy is way out of date, this has as a consequence
that there are a nu
Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20020311
Severity: wishlist
I usually find myself using packages.debian.org/_name_of_package to search
for packages, however, many times I mistype the name or the package or I
used a word of the package but not the full (exact) name.
In all this cases I receive:
D
Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20011107
Severity: wishlist
The Java policy document (provided in the java-common package and available
at w.d.o/devel) is not included as a DDP document and is not written using
debiandocsgml (but jadetex). IMHO it should be translated to debiandocsgml
(maintainer
Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20011025
Severity: normal
It seems that the latest rebuild of w.d.o has not worked properly
with http://www.debian.org/doc/admin-manuals. If you take a look at the
HTML source it seems that the WML entities have not been translated.
However, a buil
Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20010725
Severity: wishlist
We currently have the same info in the www archive as in the FTP archive
and some packages (doc-debian for example). We should find a way to provide
information common to some packages (doc-debian and doc-debian-es, for example
I just su
Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20001201
Severity: wishlist
(as sent to the debian-www mailing list)
Even though we currently have 'bug' and 'reportbug' as a way to
easily make users send bugs to the BTS, having dinner with other Debian
developers (or wannabes) in the last Hispalinux Con
6 matches
Mail list logo
