Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-16 Severity: important
(didn't now where to send this to, we should have a virtual 'debian-ddp' or 'documentation' package to send the DDP stuff to). Ok. The current DDP policy is way out of date, this has as a consequence that there are a number of discrepancies in the published documentation on how to handle, for example, internationalization extensions. Some issues that need to be tackled in policy which are currently not there: - use of CVS in the DDP documentation (this is a must and many documentation does not follow it) - how must packages be prepared: one package per document? one for each translated version? - layout of documentation in ftp.debian.org/debian/doc (we are not currently publishing there since it's done with 'byhand' targets in the packages), we need to remove the byhand targets to properly "control" that section and tell authors how to publish there - formats (other than HTML) that the document must compile to in order for it to be published. - where to send bugs related to documentation (to the package? to the www site?) - procedure of inclusion of documents in the DDP CVS server (what to edit, what to add and what to change) (not really policy but should be added) I have a draft of proposal to remove the current policy and add a new one which should close this bug. Will post more info when it's complete. Regards Javi PS: Most of this information is under 'issues' and 'ideas' in the www.debian.org/ddp pages but it's been a long time and the current policy has not changed for a long time. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux avalon 2.4.18 #1 SMP miƩ abr 3 12:47:49 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]