Re: PPC Port pages: dynamic "supported model list" and poll

On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:52:11PM +0200, Andreas Wüst wrote: > > Aaahh??? Well, there are actually efforts to build an up to date list (c.f. > Chris), but the question is if it would possible to set up a list like the one > I provided within my last post. Something release independent. > > And t

Re: PPC Port pages: dynamic "supported model list" and poll

Hi James > On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 12:10:44AM +0200, Andreas Wüst wrote: >> >> I am heading to this list due to a recent discussion held on >> debian-powerpc, which developed into a debian-www discussion. >> >> To make it (relatively) short: The page (sitting on the debian-powerpc port >> pages)

Re: Where is the mailing list archive?

On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:00:52PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > >>>I can't find it. > >>> > >> http://db.geocrawler.com/lists/3/Debian-Linux and then "win32" > > > >Is there a reason why the archive is here? > I don't known. > Maybe can the people at [EMAIL PROTECTED] tell the historic reason. B

RE: Where is the mailing list archive?

Hello Jimen, At 21:12 +0100 11/8/01, Ching, Jimen wrote: >>At 6:12 +0100 11/8/01, Thomas Uwe Gruettmueller wrote: >>>I can't find it. >>> >> http://db.geocrawler.com/lists/3/Debian-Linux and then "win32" > >Is there a reason why the archive is here? I don't known. Maybe can the people at [EMAIL PR

Re: Build problems?

On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 09:23:17PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote: > Could someone please check why my translation of DWN#29 does not show > up on w.d.o? It's now fourteen hours since I committed it, normally it > should have shown up by now... We skipped one quarterdaily update today (full rebuilds

Build problems?

Hi! Could someone please check why my translation of DWN#29 does not show up on w.d.o? It's now fourteen hours since I committed it, normally it should have shown up by now... -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law: http

Re: Usability review of debian.org?

On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 04:06:17PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > > I think some of this information can be obtained from webalizer reports, > > which are at http://klecker.debian.org/webalizer/www.debian.org/ > h, btw, it seems that our webalizer is suffering of that bug wich > caused w

Re: Usability review of debian.org?

On Wed, 7 Nov 2001 19:23:24 +0100 Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think some of this information can be obtained from webalizer reports, > which are at http://klecker.debian.org/webalizer/www.debian.org/ h, btw, it seems that our webalizer is suffering of that bug wich caused webali

Re: My name's wrong on this page

On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 03:41:22PM +, Wookey wrote: > Hi, > > Just noticed that I seem to be 'Wookey,Thom' on this page > http://www.debian.org/devel/people > for some reason - almost certainly due to the script that generates it not > expecting people to have only one name so I've randomly ac

Re: United Kindom != England

On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 08:13:17AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Hi! > > I from time to time check the template files when I notice updates > there if new things are added, or just in general (mainly to keep the > german language up to date) > > And it's not the first time now that

Bug#117050: What do we do?

* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-11-08 12:31]: > Erk. I just checked it myself, and alfie's favicon.ico is also not a proper > file, but "data", and looks distorted like the one on www.d.o. WTF is > happenning? Aaah, I think I *know* where the problem is. Apache seems to have to be told w

Bug#117050: What do we do?

On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:55:02AM +1100, Craig Small wrote: > > > > So how do we get the favicon.ico back in shape? > > > > > > If you need it in it's original style like it was mentioned on the > > > debian-www list feel free to wget it from > > > > > > > > >

Re: United Kindom != England

On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 08:34:17AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > change everything to UK for GB is not really a country but an island with > no political representation of it's own. Well, like Ionel said, UK basically means Great Britain. :) I think that this duplication exists because of two th

Re: United Kindom != England

* Ionel Mugurel Ciobîc? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-11-08 11:17]: > In Romanian ``Marea Britanie'' means Great Britain, ``Anglia'' means > England and ``Regatul Unit'' would mean United Kingdom. Well, I knew that I did made a mistake somewhere, thanks for finding it :) Yes, it seems to be quite n

Re: United Kindom != England

On 8-11-2001, at 08h 13'17", Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > I'm currently in the english/template/debian/countries.wml file, and if > I interpret the translations correct, it seems that the following > language tags seem to translate it to England: > >'GB' => {'EN' => 'United Kingdom', >

Re: United Kindom != England

Gerfried Fuchs: > With a "TODO" comment above it. Would it do harm to change the 'GB' to > Great Britain instead of letting it be a duplicate of the UK? "GB" is the ISO country code for the country, whereas "UK" is the Internet topdomain. So I guess they need to be duplicated. Regarding the Sw

Re: United Kindom != England

* Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-11-08 08:13]: >'GB' => {'EN' => 'United Kingdom', . I found out that there is also the following line there: >'UK' => {'EN' => 'United Kingdom', With a "TODO" comment above it. Would it do harm to change the 'GB' to Great Britain instead o

United Kindom != England

Hi! I from time to time check the template files when I notice updates there if new things are added, or just in general (mainly to keep the german language up to date) And it's not the first time now that I noticed that the United Kingdom is translated wrong to England - but not on