Hi,
Here you have the last tutorial of the year: "Debian Package
Information" [0].
Thanks to Enrico Zini for the session and to Francesca for the reviews
of the tutorial!
Mònica
[0] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPackageInformation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sign
Training Session: Debian Package Informations
As part of the Training Sessions initiative organized by the Debian Women
project, Enrico Zini, Debian Developer since 2002, will held on Thursday a
lesson about Debian package informations.
The lesson will focus on some tools useful both for users
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Maria Nelson wrote:
> I'm learning to build gpsim, it's up for adoption anyway. I think the latest
> debian version is 0.22.0-5, but the one I'm able to download from
> sourceforge is 0.22.0, so it seems that debian has a newer version than
> upstream is distribut
rs and try to debug it. Maybe I'm missing something.
Thanks,
Maria
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 03:54:39PM -0800, Maria Nelson wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Before a program can be turned into a Debian package, it should be
&g
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 03:54:39PM -0800, Maria Nelson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Before a program can be turned into a Debian package, it should be build-able
> with just the regular ./configure, make, make install sequence. Is that
> correct?
>
> Also, when you go to build a pa
pe, 2008-12-12 kello 15:54 -0800, Maria Nelson kirjoitti:
> Before a program can be turned into a Debian package, it should be
> build-able with just the regular ./configure, make, make install
> sequence. Is that correct?
It is not actually necessary for the upstream build system to fo
Hi All,
Before a program can be turned into a Debian package, it should be
build-able with just the regular ./configure, make, make install sequence.
Is that correct?
Also, when you go to build a package, and it doesn't build, what are your
options? Do you contact that upstream author? Is
Hi again, I'm not sure this message will get appended to the right thread.
Thanks for all your helpful suggestions. I'm definitely interested in
putting in some effort to learn how to package stuff. I'm looking to pick up
vbpp, which is currently orphaned. If I don't worry about how to Debian-iz
ti, 2008-12-02 kello 12:35 -0800, Maria Nelson kirjoitti:
> Any suggestion on how I can go about picking a package to learn to
> package?
The reason it is often suggested you work on packages that you use
yourself is that this gives you motivation to keep working on the
package. However, it is not
Welcome Maria!
2008/12/2 Meike Reichle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> For starters and for getting some initial packaging experience I'd
> recommend you to join a maintenance team. In Debian there are lots of
> team-maintained packages and many of these teams are really good
> learning grounds. http://ww
> and am hoping that any of you might give me some guidance.
>
> When I go to Debian's site, http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ , I cannot
> find any up-for-adoption or orphaned packages that I am familiar with.
> From various postings (people who currently maintain a Debian package
s postings (people who currently maintain a Debian package), I get the
impression that I am only supposed to package programs that I use on a
regular basis. Since my experience with Debian is pretty limited (I mainly
use Iceweasel, VLC, GIMP and Audacity...), I am having trouble finding a
program th
nesday, March 26, 2008 6:07:21 PM
Subject: Re: Debian Package
Hi!
* Nur Aini Rakhmawati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080326 08:06]:
> I would like to package OSS that is not need to compile.
> For example websvn package
> Is there any tutorial for it ?
In general the new maintainers guide
Hi!
* Nur Aini Rakhmawati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080326 08:06]:
> I would like to package OSS that is not need to compile.
> For example websvn package
> Is there any tutorial for it ?
In general the new maintainers guide [1]. In your special case, you
just need to adapt it a bit: Since you don
Dear all,
I would like to package OSS that is not need to compile.
For example websvn package
Is there any tutorial for it ?
thanks in advance
Aini
---
Nur Aini Rakhmawati
http://nuraini.net/
_
* Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050109 02:25]:
> I've written an article showing how to make a package
> just using dpkg and dpkg-dev.
[..]
> The document is right now in the wiki:
> http://women.alioth.debian.org/wiki/index.php/English/BuildingWithoutHelper
Did you read the lates Debian Weekly
Am Mittwoch, 12.01.05 um 14:18 Uhr schrieb aec:
$ tar xvfz roaddemo-1.0.1.tar.gz
would create a directory roaddemo-1.0.1 not roaddemo_1.0.1
It would create what ever is packed into it, which I do not know in
this case.
cu
Jutta
--
http://www.witch.westfalen.de
http://witch.muensterland.org
--
To
--- Giovanni Ridolfi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Dear Miriam,
>
> I think I found some typos in your nice article.
>
> > if she/he already did.
> I'd suggest you to use "they" instead of "she/he"
> see e.g.:
>
http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2004/08/msg00075.html
>
> and... I'd rather
aec wrote:
It was created by extracting roaddemo-1.0.1.tar.gz, which happened in
the line 'tar xvfz roaddemo-1.0.1.tar.gz'
Not to nitpick but I think Giovanni is correct...
$ tar xvfz roaddemo-1.0.1.tar.gz
would create a directory roaddemo-1.0.1 not roaddemo_1.0.1
Ah, um, yes, you're qu
> Giovanni Ridolfi wrote:
> >> $ cd roaddemo_1.0.1
> >I do not understand when the *directory* roaddemo_1.0.1 (underscore)
> >was created.
> >
>
> Rob Taylor wrote:
> It was created by extracting roaddemo-1.0.1.tar.gz, which happened in
> the line 'tar xvfz roaddemo-1.0.1.tar.gz'
Not to nitpic
Giovanni Ridolfi wrote:
Dear Miriam,
I think I found some typos in your nice article.
> if she/he already did.
I'd suggest you to use "they" instead of "she/he"
see e.g.:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2004/08/msg00075.html
and... I'd rather prefer you use the present perfect
instead of past si
Dear Miriam,
I think I found some typos in your nice article.
> if she/he already did.
I'd suggest you to use "they" instead of "she/he"
see e.g.:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2004/08/msg00075.html
and... I'd rather prefer you use the present perfect
instead of past simple
if she/he alre
Em Dom, 2005-01-09 às 02:25 +0100, Miriam Ruiz escreveu:
> I've written an article showing how to make a package
> just using dpkg and dpkg-dev. It shall not be
> undestood as "here's an easy/good way to maintain your
> packages", but as "here is how the insid
I've written an article showing how to make a package
just using dpkg and dpkg-dev. It shall not be
undestood as "here's an easy/good way to maintain your
packages", but as "here is how the insides of debian
package building works". I don't know if it can be
us
24 matches
Mail list logo
