Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 07:31:38PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> > > most popular open source revision control software.
>> >
>> > And among the most horrible ones.
>> >
>> Agreed. Why anyone would bother to reimplement an alrea
Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG dijo [Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 02:20:45PM -0700]:
>> > For several reasons, one being that the BSD folks use CVS extensively, it's
>> > part of how the ports system (and upgrades) work.
>>
>>
Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to register my objection to this package being installed, even
> in non-free. As a Transgaming subscriber and supporter of their work, I
> don't want to see Transgaming's work be diluted, and I imagine that many
> people feel similarly. I urge the pr
Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I agree. But I also said "I urge the prospective maintainer to
> reconsider." because I recognise that it's totally up to the prospective
> maintainer. I personally don't wish it to be included, but can't do a
> whole lot if the maintainer sees different
Marc Leeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 6. Will it be in debian?
> As things are now, no...
> Distributing it would only be temporary (most likely, it would be
> cut off before it even reaches unstable).
Since Transgaming is essentially lying about the license, would it not
be at least valuable
Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But in the role of a transgaming affiliate, I'd prefer that you
> don't if you want them to have an income; they're not "lying", the
> license do allow you to make packages, but that permission is meant
> to allow "fair use" (you can make packages for yours
Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 3 Jun 2002, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> > If they simply change the license now to reflect their true
> > intentions, then that would be fine.
>
> There was a change in the license preamble in the WineX CVS about
Chris Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree. But I don't think they should be part of the r5rs-doc
> package. And I'm not over-keen to maintain the package, as I already
> maintain a lot of packages.
I was hoping that the r5rs-doc maintainer would be a good person to
maintain the package
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
"WB" is a disk based (sorted) associative-array package with C, SCM,
Java, and C# libraries. These associative arrays consist of variable
length (0.B to 255.B) keys and values. Functions are provided to:
* create, destroy, open and close disk-files and asso
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is an arbitrary distinction that has no clear basis in the law.
> You are also circumventing CSS by playing the DVD in question (viewing
> is also a form of "access"). Remember that CSS is a standard developed
> by a consortium of DVD *player manu
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 09:09:10AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > This is an arbitrary distinction that has no clear basis in the law.
> > > You
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian T. Sniffen) writes:
> DMCA 1201(a)(1)(A): No person shall circumvent a technological
> measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under
> this title. The prohibition contained in the preceding sentence shall
> take effect at the end of the 2-year period
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
This is the old version of the g-wrap library, replaced by the Debian
g-wrap package. There may be programs which still use it, so I'm not
asking for its deletion outright.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This license fails DFSG 3 and I would recommend to the author that he
> use the right tool for the job. If he wants trademark protection in the
> Wpoison logo, he should apply for it. Of course, any party that
> attempts to use laws other than copyr
"Sunnanvind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Re-read. It says "image should be inside the hyperlink", not the other
> way around.
You're right, but it still seems to prohibit any kind of distribution
which is not by hyperlinks that include their logo. That's not
trademark protection, it's rather
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 20011215T235408-0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > (The canonical example here is TeX
> > which has such a restriction.)
>
> TeX is already a special case as it really does not have a clear
> license, but ev
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 20011216T112830-0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Um, no, TeX has a perfectly clear license.
>
> Would you please give a reference to it?
>From tex.web:
% This program is copyright (C) 1982 by D. E. Knuth;
"Sunnanvind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My own interpretation is that it can be distributed in the non-free
> archive. It fails DFSG 3 by not allowing removal of the hyperlink; but as
> long as the hyperlink is there, I don't see any problem for non-free.
The non-free archive contains hyperl
"Sunnanvind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The license require no such thing.
> What it does require is that the image is displayed, hyperlinked (i.e.
> placed within hyperlink tags) to the specific page.
Where are you proposing we place that hyperlink?
I hereby intend to adopt the xpuzzles package.
Hi Ian,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi JAson,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Martin,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi sebastian,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Martin,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Mark,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Bas,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Mark,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Sean,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Ian,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Sean,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Nicolas,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Greg,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Guenter,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Miquel,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Mark,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Mark,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Patrick,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Igor,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Dafydd,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Martin,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Sebastian Schaffert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 01:59:36PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi sebastian,
> >
> > Do you still intend to adopt this package?
> >
> > If yes, please upload a packag
Hi Bao,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Ian,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Ian,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Michael,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Jim,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Ian,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Rich,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Bao,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Adam,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Ian,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Ole,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Jason,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA:.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Make,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O.
Daniel Kobras expressed an interest in maintaining the package also,
so if you decide you don't want to adopt it, you might want to send
him a note. ([EMAIL PROTEC
Hi Jan-Hendrik,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi JAn-Hendrik,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Jacob,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Jan-Hendrik,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA.
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Mark,
Do you still intend to adopt this package?
If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA.
Thanks,
Thomas
Patrick Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I adopted the package and uploaded version 0.0.9-1 some time ago.
> Not sure why the WNPP bug didn't close. I'll close it now via
> email.
Great!
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Thomas-
OK, I will get it uploaded. I have been writing replacements
for the parts of the package that are not free. I assume that
I should not include the non-free programs in the interim
package.
-=greg
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Bushnell
--- Begin Message ---
> Do you still intend to adopt this package?
>
> If yes, please upload a package;
>> If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O.
> Daniel Kobras expressed an interest in maintaining the package also,
> so if you decide you don't want to adopt it, you might want to send
> h
Martin Sjögren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 02:30:40PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Do you still intend to adopt this package?
>
> The way I recall it, it was decided to remove this package from the
> archive, and it doesn't seem
--- Begin Message ---
Yeah, thanks for the nudge, I'll get on that. The holiday season had be
a bit distracted.
jrw
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 03:07:49PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> Hi Jacob,
>
> Do you still intend to adopt this package?
>
> If yes, please up
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 02:35:38PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Do you still intend to adopt this package?
>
> If yes, please upload a package;
> If no, please change this WNPP bug back to O:.
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
Um y
Nicolas SABOURET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" wrote:
> >
> > Hi Nicolas,
> >
> > Do you still intend to adopt this package?
> >
> > If yes, please upload a package;
> > If no, please change this WNPP bug back
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
This is the old imlib library, which was used by the old gnome-1
system.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
This is the old gnome-1 version of the gtkhtml rendering library.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
This is the old gnome-1 version of the oaf object library.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
This is the old gnome-1 version of the capplet support library.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
This is the old gnome-1 version of the glade loading library.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
This is the old gnome-1 version of gal.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
This is the old gnome-1 version of bonobo.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
This is the old gnome-1 version of the gnome printing architecture.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
This is the old gnome-1 version of the core gnome libraries.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
This is the old gnome-1 version of the oaf object library.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I cannot maintain malaga any longer, and don't use it anymore myself.
It is a nifty program and someone should pick it up. Note that there
is a more recent version at
http://home.arcor.de/bjoern-beutel/malaga/.
Upstream does maintain this package and is responsive
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
These are PostScript Type1 renderings and TFMs of the EC variants
of the standard TeX CMR font family. These fonts include characters
with European accents.
This package is necessary for packaging newer versions of lilypond.
http://lilypond.org/download/fonts.
Are you still planning to take over maintenance of the Debian
"roleplaying" package? On May 25 you said you were planning to start
working on it.
If you no longer intend to adopt the package, please change its status
back to orphaned (I would be happy to do that for you if you like).
If you d
There used to be an established set of procedures for aging stale ITP
and ITA wnpp entries, and setting them back to O.
As I recall, it was something like:
If the ITA or ITP is more than a month old, then:
QA/WNPP sends email asking if they still intend to package or need
help,
If no respons
See bug 228039.
Freehoo should, in my opinion, be dropped from unstable. The last
change in the upstream CVS was seven months ago, and given that yahoo
changes its protocols frequently (and deliberately to frustrate free
clients)--and since gaim is doing a decent job of keeping up--there
doesn
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > for any action; however, if I saw good reason from the history of a
> > > bug report to not do anything, then I didn't write mail at all.
>
> > By RFP you mean ITA?
>
> No, I meant: Request for Packages and Intend to Package.
Oh; I'm thinking spe
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I did take 6 months for an ITP, and one year for a RFP as lower limit
> for any action; however, if I saw good reason from the history of a
> bug report to not do anything, then I didn't write mail at all.
By RFP you mean ITA?
I think six months and a
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040809 22:55]:
> > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Well, there is a list of ITA packages. Of course, you need to take a
> > > look into the bug report i
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, if you prepare text and code for it, I'll put it on the web
> page. But the issue there is IMHO: How can the program dectect when
> the title was changed? So, it needs to permanently track each bug.
Well, I can prepare text. ;) I'm not good at th
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, if you prepare text and code for it, I'll put it on the web
> > page. But the issue there is IMHO: How can the program dectect when
> > the title was c
It looks like you adopted sgrep on August 12, but the wnpp bug marking
the package as orphaned (bug 229961) is still open. You created a bug
(260113) when you did the ITA, and closed it with your new upload, but
the orphaning bug (229961) is still open.
Can you please close 229961, to indicate t
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As it stands now, there hasn't been any upstream work on it in a long
> time, and my impression from the last time I spoke with the author was
> that he wasn't sure when he might be able to work on it heavily again.
That's fair enough. They are, however,
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you're interested in adopting this package, please take contact with
> Thomas Bushnell (which is in copy) since he suggested he might adopt
> the packages.
I do not intend to adopt bonobo-activation. (At present.) It does
not seem to be necessary
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> After some checks with the pkg-gnome maintainers and after the
> confirmation of Takuo KITAME, and following the discussions in
> debian-gtk-gnome and debian-release concerning the status of GNOME 1,
> I'm orphaning a couple of GNOME 1 packages.
>
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
--- Begin Message ---
QOF - Query Object Framework - library to add a query engine to C applications
with generic XML backend. A SQL database is not needed; any collection of
C/C++ objects can act as tables. Used by GnuCash, GnoTime, pilot-QOF,
cashutil and qof
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> gnucash and xfonts-thai-ttf are the only two packages which depend on
> x-ttcidfont-conf, a package that has been orphaned for over 2 years.
> I think I asked you before whether gnucash really needs
> xfonts-thai-ttf but I cannot find anything in my m
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is anyone who maintains a package depending on libglade up to this, or
> could the GNOME team adopt libglade?
>
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/06/msg01199.html
Since I'm the de facto gnome 1 weenie, being the last maintainer of a
big
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Jacal is a symbolic math package written in scm by Aubrey Jaffer. It is
distributed under the GPL. Current upstream version is 1b7, released on
October 22, 2006.
http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~jaffer/JACAL.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 21:20 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> We've got a problem here, since all three packages are in testing,
> provide /usr/bin/aleph, and conflict with each other (or rather, the
> *tex* packages conflict with aleph).
Eek.
>
> The right solution to this would be to package the "n
From Paul's comments, it seems to me that there is no need for the
current Aleph it's been replaced, and it's three years old. I have no
opinion about whether it ought to be dropped from Debian.
Paul also explains that AFNIX replaced Aleph, and should not be thought
of as just a new version with
98 matches
Mail list logo
