"Sunnanvind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Re-read. It says "image should be inside the hyperlink", not the other > way around.
You're right, but it still seems to prohibit any kind of distribution which is not by hyperlinks that include their logo. That's not trademark protection, it's rather a kind of forced advertising. Unlike the noxious BSD advertising clause, however, it actually requires the advertising, and as such, is non-free. It seems to me that we cannot even distribute it in the nonfree archive.
