On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 10:49:30PM +0200, martin f. krafft wrote:
> Sorry, left out the following
Please disregard my previous message. :)
--
G. Branden Robinson| There's nothing an agnostic can't
Debian GNU/Linux | do if he doesn't know whether he
[EMA
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 12:58:12PM +1000, Matt Hope wrote:
> * Package name : gridengine
> Version : 5.2
> Copyright Holder : Sun Microsystems, Inc.
> * URL : http://gridengine.sunsource.net/
> * License : SISSL
> Description : Distributed Resource Mana
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 04:33:59PM +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> * Package name: htun
> Version : 0.9.0
> Upstream Author : Moshe Jacobson & Ola Nordström under Russell Clark
> * URL : http://runslinux.net/projects.html#htun
> * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD,
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:47:35AM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
> * Package name: ogmtools
> Version : 0.901
> Upstream Author : Moritz Bunkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.bunkus.org/videotools/ogmtools/
> * License : GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.
> Desc
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 10:10:47PM -0500, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
> * Package name: axkit-xsp-session
> Version : 0.92
> Upstream Author : Jörg Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.some.org/
> * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
> Descriptio
On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 01:34:32PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> * Package name: python-tarfile
> Version : 0.4.8
> Upstream Author : Lars Gustäbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.gustaebel.de/lars/tarfile/
> * License : OpenSource (see README)
>
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 11:45:02PM +0200, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> * Package name: ltp
> Version : 20020709
> Upstream Author : Various <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://ltp.sourceforge.net>
> * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
> Description :
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 04:00:15PM +0100, Laurent Mazet wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-13
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: libemf
> Version : x.y.z
> Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.some.org/
> * L
retitle 168329 ITA: qtella -- Gnutella client
thanks
Doh, didn't realize this was already orphaned. I'm the Brian who's
supposed to adopt this.
--
People said I was dumb, but I proved them!
pgp6vjV1BoMJG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 168329 ITA: qtella -- Gnutella client
Bug#168329: O: qtella -- Gnutella client
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Hello!
Just to note to all of you interested on a free
flash plugin that David Schleef made a SWF Flash
player which includes a Mozilla plugin and a library.
It's name is swf-player and is now in Debian unstable.
thanks Dave!
--
Robert Millan
"5 years from now everyone will be running
free G
Your message dated Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:50:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168875: fixed in cl-parse-number 1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:40:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168303: fixed in cl-regex 1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:39:46 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168334: fixed in cl-lexer 1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:39:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168330: fixed in cl-awk 1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:23:48 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#157439: fixed in blosxom 0.5i-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:30:47 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#104765: fixed in mysql-connector-java 2.0.14-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:22:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#156580: fixed in libinti1.0 1.0beta2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:03:59 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148988: fixed in nat 1:1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:28:42 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#163377: fixed in pdb2dhl 1.0.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 05:29:57PM +0200, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
PL>> Maybe we should forma a Task Force for this. What do you think to
PL>> post to debian-devel asking for help? It's really trivial to
PL>> package dbi-ruby stuff, the problem is to package every
PL>> dependency.
DB> I think
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:08:24PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Description : Python interface to GnuPG
>
> Ooh, nice, this sounds like just what I needed to be able to implement
> the package signing stuff.
OK, it's uploaded and pending FTP master attention right now.
If I might ask
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 165860 ITP: libpam-pwgen - module to generate passwords
Bug#165860: RFP: libpam-pwgen - module to generate passwords
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-14
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: bopm
Version : 2.31
Upstream Authors: Erik Fears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Andy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
David Leadbeater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I intend to package the GoFish gopher server, written by Sean
MacLennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, and released under the GNU GPL.
Upstream sources are available from http://sf.net/projects/gofish/.
Current version is 0.22.
Description:
GoFish is a simple gopher / web
Note that current URL is:
http://www.gnome.org/projects/devtools/gide.shtml
the other one corresponds to the old project.
--
Robert Millan
"5 years from now everyone will be running
free GNU on their 200 MIPS, 64M SPARCstation-5"
Andrew S. Tanenbaum, 30 Jan 1992
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
Sorry, I've run out of time for this packaging. I was thinking of finishing it
by january (after my life goes back to normal), but if you'd like you can
take over the package right now.
It's not a difficult task, the main problem is to get t
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-11-14
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: lrrd
Version : 0.92
Upstream Author : Linpro AS (http://www.linpro.no)
* URL : http://lrrd.sf.net
* License : GPL
Description : gathers information from your network and gra
No, i have no craving and no special reason why i wan't to adop these
package. The only reason for my decision was that i have it in use and
therefore i know a little about it.
So if you have no further interests handing over this package i will look
for another one.
greetings
Stephan Kaufhold
Your message dated Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:46:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ifenslave request for adoption
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Previously John Goerzen wrote:
> * Package name: python-gnupginterface
> Version : 0.3.2
> Upstream Author : Frank J. Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://py-gnupg.sourceforge.net/
> * License : LGPL
> Description : Python interface to GnuPG
Ooh, nic
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 08:01:20PM +0100, Stephan Kaufhold wrote:
> i'm a new maintainer and intent to adop the ifenslave package
> Is this OK for you? Please let me know.
Is there any reason you want to adopt ifenslave instead of another
package? This is a package with a problem: it needs kernel
32 matches
Mail list logo
