Your message dated Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:46:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ifenslave request for adoption
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2002 18:53:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 20 13:53:39 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 232pc232.sshunet.nl (xar.sliepen.oi) [131.211.232.232] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17hE8I-0004YB-00; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:53:38 -0500
Received: from haplo.sliepen.oi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
[IPv6:fec0::1:2d0:b7ff:fe18:ca14] (may be forged))
by xar.sliepen.oi (8.12.5/8.12.5/Debian-1) with ESMTP id g7KIrZHe018235
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL);
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 20:53:36 +0200
Received: from haplo.sliepen.oi (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by haplo.sliepen.oi (8.12.5/8.12.5/Debian-1) with ESMTP id
g7KIrZLF013527
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL);
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 20:53:35 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by haplo.sliepen.oi (8.12.5/8.12.5/Debian-1) id g7KIrZRq013526;
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 20:53:35 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: ifenslave -- Attach and detach slave interfaces to a bonding
device.
From: "Guus Sliepen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.50
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 20:53:34 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-20
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the ifenslave package.
The package description is:
This is a tool to attach and detach slave network interfaces to a bonding
device. A bonding device will act like a normal Ethernet network device to
the kernel, but will send out the packets via the slave devices using a simple
round-robin scheduler. This allows for simple load-balancing, identical to
"channel bonding" or "trunking" techniques used in switches.
.
The kernel must have support for bonding devices for ifenslave to be useful.
The problem is that ifenslave depends on kernel headers. I'd like
someone more experienced with working with kernel headers to take over
this package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux haplo 2.4.19-ac4 #1 Tue Aug 6 09:51:40 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=nl_NL, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 157433-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2002 11:47:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 14 05:47:04 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 232pc232.sshunet.nl [131.211.232.232]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18CISd-0007I2-00; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 05:47:03 -0600
Received: from xar.sliepen.eu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by xar.sliepen.eu.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-8) with ESMTP id
gAEBkqEn004250
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL);
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:46:54 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by xar.sliepen.eu.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-8) id gAEBkl6D004249;
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:46:47 +0100
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:46:47 +0100
From: Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stephan Kaufhold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joerg Wendland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ifenslave request for adoption
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iQ6IArq7eFCrt6Lv"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-oi: oi
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.7 required=5.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,
QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
--iQ6IArq7eFCrt6Lv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:41:36PM +0100, Stephan Kaufhold wrote:
> No, i have no craving and no special reason why i wan't to adop these
> package. The only reason for my decision was that i have it in use and
> therefore i know a little about it.=20
> So if you have no further interests handing over this package i will look
> for another one.
Ok. Apologies for not closing this RFA in time! Good luck with your next
package :).
--=20
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--iQ6IArq7eFCrt6Lv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9040nAxLow12M2nsRAqSIAJ9WeS+VifEDTNyMXicL3hqNI9c1dQCgschM
5Q5/1rndJdmXdh2aEM07vNQ=
=0ZUx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--iQ6IArq7eFCrt6Lv--
