Re: Constitutional amendment: reduce the length of DPL election process

2007-08-06 Thread Milan Zamazal
elections is the most complicated voting with many options (candidates) and many documents to study (platforms, rebuttals + discussion). Perhaps I'm not the only one who would prefer to retain the extra week to get better opportunity to participate in DPL voting? Regards, Milan Zamazal

Re: Nuance Regarding RMS

2021-04-01 Thread Milan Zamazal
> "JS" == Jonas Smedegaard writes: JS> Question is, this being a process to compose a ballot for a JS> vote: How to transform those observations into a text for the JS> ballot? Or if that is absurd, how else to proceed (other than JS> shrug and let the boting process continue

Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 5

2021-04-03 Thread Milan Zamazal
> "DS" == Dmitry Smirnov writes: DS> So many man-hours were lost on this GR already in the midst of DS> the pre-release freeze, just to name one problem... DS> We are on a slippery slope of turning Debian into political DS> project. One good thing about this GR is that it wi

Re: Willingness to share a position statement?

2021-04-03 Thread Milan Zamazal
> "SM" == Steve McIntyre writes: SM> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:26:56PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: >> On Friday, 2 April 2021 11:09:42 PM AEDT Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: >>> Thanks for arguing for my point: Communism was a beautiful >>> theoretical >>> idea which was i

Re: New option for the RMS/FSF GR: reaffirm the values of the majority

2021-04-04 Thread Milan Zamazal
> "MK" == Matthias Klumpp writes: MK> I did actually read this as satire and was quite amused by it I’m not amused by it. I liked the 1st April joke, but this is not fun anymore and the fact that someone as respectful as Enrico does that makes me thinking about some ballot options in a

Re: Analysis of the ballot options

2004-06-20 Thread Milan Zamazal
esponse to this insane GR is --1 (without actually performing Further Discussion after the voting ends). And I won't repeat my mistake of ignoring the votings I don't consider significant enough. Milan Zamazal -- I think any law that restricts independent use

Re: Analysis of the ballot options

2004-06-20 Thread Milan Zamazal
>>>>> "RM" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RM> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 08:47:56PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> My analysis is that this GR is simply insane. RM> You think it's out of touch with reality? Yes, I feel i

Re: Analysis of the ballot options

2004-06-20 Thread Milan Zamazal
>>>>> "ES" == Eike \"zyro\" Sauer writes: ES> Milan Zamazal schrieb: >> so Debian shouldn't make to look itself even more foolish by >> making and reverting changes without really good reasons. ES> Adult people should no

Re: Analysis of the ballot options

2004-06-21 Thread Milan Zamazal
>>>>> "RM" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RM> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 08:41:55AM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> be abused by focusing on the exact wording of the SC. Taking the >> wording literally and "solving&quo