On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 05:52:49PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Friday 22 June 2007 16:50, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Not for the benefit of that developer, but for our benefit. I have no fear
> > at all of Matthew Garrett doing an incompetent job of preparing packages;
> > why should we make
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Am I the only one feeling uncomfortable with people who would like to
> upload packages to our pool that don't understand and agree with our
> goals? Am I the only one feeling uncomfortable with creating a status
> for people without a certain level of
Em Sex, 2007-06-22 às 17:52 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst escreveu:
> They are in NM, so have the intention to become a DD soon.
If I did not completely fail to understand the proposal, it is not only
about people in NM willing to become DDs. As previously mentioned, being
a Debian Developer involves ver
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 12:40:43PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> So in the end, I see the DM concept as an opportunity to strenghen the
> training and mentoring aspect of the NM process,
Maybe that's why I differ. NM is not a training staging area.
Sponsoring is supposed to come first, hence pa
On 23/06/07 at 13:43 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> AM delays
> ~
> For the former, well, if it's because of the NM taking too much time,
> the AM usually put their applicant on hold. That works (IMHO) quite
> fine, and is not a problem. OTOH AM being to slow is one, and happens. I
> thi
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 03:16:46PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 23/06/07 at 13:43 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > AM delays
> > ~
> > For the former, well, if it's because of the NM taking too much time,
> > the AM usually put their applicant on hold. That works (IMHO) quite
> > fi
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 01:43:03PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Upload rights
> ~
> With those two previous points in place, I still think that DM has one
> idea right: give upload rights early. [...]
> So I also think that the jetring idea has to be explored and
> implemented fo
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 02:50:59PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> So here's a proposal for the Debian Maintainers idea that's been floating
> around for some time now [0].
Before pushing the DM proposal, I'd like that some more attempts to
fix NM have been done. I mean, for about 2 y
On 23.06.2007 14:43 schrieb Pierre Habouzit:
> DAM delays
> ~~
>
> This part can IMHO be improved a lot as well. I _think_ DAM could
> decide to process applicants at given dates, in a predictable way. I
> mean, DAM could decide to process applicants every 2 or 3 months[0].
> That would
Le Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 02:50:59PM +0100, Anthony Towns:
>
> So here's a proposal for the Debian Maintainers idea that's been floating
> around for some time now [0]. I've drafted it while lying in bed in
> the Budget Backpackers before wandering up to debconf, so it's just my
> take on things, an
Benjamin BAYART wrote:
> Raphael did kindly give me a pointer to your running discussions, which
> is of interest for me, since I'm one of the potential "DM" in a near
> future, and I wanted to give my point of view on that topic, and to give
> a few comments on the text.
Thanks for your mail.
>
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > 15 months, while with DM, it would have been only few days...
>
> No. You won't be able to fix it unless you have become a DM with
> exactly the dvidvi package and thus are allowed to upload a fixed
> version. Otherwise you aren't and need to go throu
12 matches
Mail list logo
