Shouldn't there be a link to the constitution from the Debian
homepage? How about above or below the link to the Social Contract?
I cannot find the technical committee public mailing list archives
(Debian Constitution, s6.3(3)) on http://lists.debian.org. Where are
they?
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:49:46AM -0700, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> I admit that that ballot was unclear :( I did like Mr. Buck's ballot and I
> received another good suggestion via private email.
Ok, now what, ...
Do you plan to remove the first two ballot and propose a new ballot that is
clear
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 10:48:12AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Without regard to constitutionality, I believe there are technical reasons
> > why non-free should remain a little while longer. Netscape is the biggest
> > of them at the moment since
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think i agree with you in principle, but what do you propose to do with the
> non-free packages ? just remove them from debian disks ?
They are not on the Debian disks now.
> What will happen to them, would they still be able to use the BTS for their
>
Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What will happen to them, would they still be able to use the BTS for their
> > packages ? Or should they make provision for having their own apt-gettable
> > repository for people to download. I think not everyone has t
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 11:30:09PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
>
> Shouldn't there be a link to the constitution from the Debian
> homepage? How about above or below the link to the Social Contract?
The Debian Constitution is about the organizational structure and
governing of debian develo
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please don't make such assumptions when replying to such a valid
> criticism. I maintain some non-free packages because I feel that
> they are needed, and I might not do it if the burden becomes
> excessive (such as having to build an outside home a
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 11:04:53AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > I think i agree with you in principle, but what do you propose to do with
> > the
> > non-free packages ? just remove them from debian disks ?
>
> They are not on the Debian disks now.
Depends on what you think Debian disk
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 12:13:42AM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> I cannot find the technical committee public mailing list archives
> (Debian Constitution, s6.3(3)) on http://lists.debian.org. Where are
> they?
The list is called `debian-ctte'.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Ass
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Brown) wrote on 12.10.00 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
>
> > I don't think the Secretary should summarize proposals this way -- it's
> > almost impossible to do without bias. Presumably the proponents of
> > th
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Depends on what you think Debian disks are :)
I would count the Official Debian disks.
I cannot find the technical committee public mailing list archives
(Debian Constitution, s6.3(3)) on http://lists.debian.org. Where are
they?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:49:46AM -0700, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> I admit that that ballot was unclear :( I did like Mr. Buck's ballot and I
> received another good suggestion via private email.
Ok, now what, ...
Do you plan to remove the first two ballot and propose a new ballot that is
clea
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 10:48:12AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Without regard to constitutionality, I believe there are technical reasons
> > why non-free should remain a little while longer. Netscape is the biggest
> > of them at the moment since
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think i agree with you in principle, but what do you propose to do with the
> non-free packages ? just remove them from debian disks ?
They are not on the Debian disks now.
> What will happen to them, would they still be able to use the BTS for their
Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What will happen to them, would they still be able to use the BTS for their
> > packages ? Or should they make provision for having their own apt-gettable
> > repository for people to download. I think not everyone has
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 11:30:09PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
>
> Shouldn't there be a link to the constitution from the Debian
> homepage? How about above or below the link to the Social Contract?
The Debian Constitution is about the organizational structure and
governing of debian devel
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please don't make such assumptions when replying to such a valid
> criticism. I maintain some non-free packages because I feel that
> they are needed, and I might not do it if the burden becomes
> excessive (such as having to build an outside home
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 11:04:53AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > I think i agree with you in principle, but what do you propose to do with the
> > non-free packages ? just remove them from debian disks ?
>
> They are not on the Debian disks now.
Depends on what you think Debian disks ar
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 12:13:42AM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> I cannot find the technical committee public mailing list archives
> (Debian Constitution, s6.3(3)) on http://lists.debian.org. Where are
> they?
The list is called `debian-ctte'.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for As
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Brown) wrote on 12.10.00 in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
>
> > I don't think the Secretary should summarize proposals this way -- it's
> > almost impossible to do without bias. Presumably the proponents of
> >
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Depends on what you think Debian disks are :)
I would count the Official Debian disks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Josip" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Josip> On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 12:13:42AM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
>> I cannot find the technical committee public mailing list archives
>> (Debian Constitution, s6.3(3)) on http://lists.debian.org. Where are
>> they?
24 matches
Mail list logo