[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Brown) wrote on 12.10.00 in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
>
> > I don't think the Secretary should summarize proposals this way -- it's
> > almost impossible to do without bias. Presumably the proponents of
> > the proposals spent a lot of time crafting them to say exactly what
> > they should say, and that's what the voters should be reading.
>
> It might be worth looking at the way in which CFVs are produced for
> the various Usenet heirachies - there's a lot of experience there of
> doing just this sort of thing.
Well, in the hierarchies I know about (such as the Big8), there is a lot
of experience in *not* doing just this thing. The ballot is the text
presented by just one side of the argument (the one that wants to change
the status quo).
MfG Kai
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
