[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Brown) wrote on 12.10.00 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > > > I don't think the Secretary should summarize proposals this way -- it's > > almost impossible to do without bias. Presumably the proponents of > > the proposals spent a lot of time crafting them to say exactly what > > they should say, and that's what the voters should be reading. > > It might be worth looking at the way in which CFVs are produced for > the various Usenet heirachies - there's a lot of experience there of > doing just this sort of thing. Well, in the hierarchies I know about (such as the Big8), there is a lot of experience in *not* doing just this thing. The ballot is the text presented by just one side of the argument (the one that wants to change the status quo). MfG Kai
