On Fri, Jun 04, 1999 at 04:49:09AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I don't know how controversial this suggestion will be, but I propose that
> the official version of the new logo be the one with the bottle in it.
Seconded.
--
Havoc Consulting | unix, linux, perl, mail, www, internet, s
This message is being forwarded on the request of Branden Robinson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. It may appear a little unclear but AOL actually
means I second this proposal. I feel quite strongly that the logos should be
swapped.
- Forwarded message from Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>From e
I already mentioned a while ago that I think that the distinction
between main and contrib & non-free is becoming less clear, both
to users and developers.
The Debian distribution itself consists only of the main-tree. Contrib
and non-free are there mostly as a (popular) service to our users. But
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Since I don't want any excuses that people are not aware of this, I will
> copy this vote-request here as well. Please respect the reply-to and
> discuss this on the debian-vote list.
I'll just send this directly to debian-vote(there was no reply-to)
On Mon, Jun 21, 1999 at 06:22:05PM -0400, R Garth Wood wrote:
> I'll just send this directly to debian-vote(there was no reply-to).
>
> The reason the distinction is not clear now is that ppl want
> that feature(to be easy to install debs of any license).
> If you try to change that they will just
R Garth Wood wrote:
> The reason the distinction is not clear now is that ppl want
> that feature(to be easy to install debs of any license).
> If you try to change that they will just circumvent
> whatever measure is in place and make it just as easy,
> perhaps making the distinction less clear.
>
On Mon, Jun 21, 1999 at 11:30:41PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman - Debian project
leader wrote:
> I already mentioned a while ago that I think that the distinction
> between main and contrib & non-free is becoming less clear, both
> to users and developers.
> The ballot will contain the options:
>
> 1
On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 12:43:26AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> YEAH!!! Wichert, you are my hero! It's so important that we make a decision
> on it, and I hope it will be (1) or (2), but not (3).
I agree :)
> Richard Stallman will be happy, too, and I think it is a good idea to make
> this ste
On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 12:43:26AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> YEAH!!! Wichert, you are my hero!
Oops :)
This should have been sent privately to Wichert. There is nothing
confidential in it, but because it is not actually a useful contribution to
this thread, please ignore it. I apologize
9 matches
Mail list logo
