This message is being forwarded on the request of Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. It may appear a little unclear but AOL actually means I second this proposal. I feel quite strongly that the logos should be swapped.
----- Forwarded message from Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
>From edward Fri Jun 4 18:25:36 1999
Received: from smack.hairnet [192.168.0.6] (mail)
by portaloo.hairnet with esmtp (Exim 3.01 #1 (Debian))
id 10pxiq-0000cR-00; Fri, 04 Jun 1999 18:25:36 +0100
Received: from punt-11.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.34]
by smack.hairnet with smtp (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 10pxdt-0001OF-00; Fri, 4 Jun 1999 18:20:31 +0100
Received: from punt-1.mail.demon.net by mailstore for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 928508981:10:19939:107; Fri, 04 Jun 99 15:09:41 GMT
Received: from murphy.debian.org ([209.41.108.199]) by punt-1.mail.demon.net
id ab1118681; 4 Jun 99 14:58 GMT
Received: (qmail 21735 invoked by uid 38); 4 Jun 1999 14:51:32 -0000
Resent-Date: 4 Jun 1999 14:51:31 -0000
Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 13:57:52 +0100
From: Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian developers list <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSED] Swap the "open" and "official" versions of the new logo
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: Debian developers list <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from Joseph Carter on Fri, Jun 04, 1999 at
03:27:57AM -0700
Sender: Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-Message-ID: <"vPqnRC.A.-SF.yf-V3"@murphy>
Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/37483
X-Loop: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1072
Lines: 41
On debian-devel, Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't know how controversial this suggestion will be, but I propose that
> > the official version of the new logo be the one with the bottle in it.
>
> If we have to have the bottle, I'd agree with you---we should.
AOL
I think that a swirl on its own would work better for a logo in an icon, maybe
for .deb files in a file manager.
--
I consume, therefore I am
----- End forwarded message -----
--
I consume, therefore I am
pgpPOmj5xvp5a.pgp
Description: PGP signature
